Cargando…

Optimal Breast Density Characterization Using a Three-Dimensional Automated Breast Densitometry System

Dense breasts are a risk factor for breast cancer. Assessment of breast density is important and radiologist-dependent. We objectively measured mammographic density using the three-dimensional automatic mammographic density measurement device Volpara™ and examined the criteria for combined use of ul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshida, Reika, Yamauchi, Takenori, Akashi-Tanaka, Sadako, Matsuyanagi, Misaki, Taruno, Kanae, Sawada, Terumasa, Kokaze, Akatsuki, Nakamura, Seigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060448
_version_ 1784620713464823808
author Yoshida, Reika
Yamauchi, Takenori
Akashi-Tanaka, Sadako
Matsuyanagi, Misaki
Taruno, Kanae
Sawada, Terumasa
Kokaze, Akatsuki
Nakamura, Seigo
author_facet Yoshida, Reika
Yamauchi, Takenori
Akashi-Tanaka, Sadako
Matsuyanagi, Misaki
Taruno, Kanae
Sawada, Terumasa
Kokaze, Akatsuki
Nakamura, Seigo
author_sort Yoshida, Reika
collection PubMed
description Dense breasts are a risk factor for breast cancer. Assessment of breast density is important and radiologist-dependent. We objectively measured mammographic density using the three-dimensional automatic mammographic density measurement device Volpara™ and examined the criteria for combined use of ultrasonography (US). Of 1227 patients who underwent primary breast cancer surgery between January 2019 and April 2021 at our hospital, 441 were included. A case series study was conducted based on patient age, diagnostic accuracy, effects of mammography (MMG) combined with US, size of invasion, and calcifications. The mean density of both breasts according to the Volpara Density Grade (VDG) was 0–3.4% in 2 patients, 3.5–7.4% in 55 patients, 7.5–15.4% in 173 patients, and ≥15.5% in 211 patients. Breast density tended to be higher in younger patients. Diagnostic accuracy of MMG tended to decrease with increasing breast density. US detection rates were not associated with VDG on MMG and were favorable at all densities. The risk of a non-detected result was high in patients without malignant suspicious calcifications. Supplementary use of US for patients without suspicious calcifications on MMG and high breast density, particularly ≥25.5%, could improve the breast cancer detection rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8700257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87002572021-12-24 Optimal Breast Density Characterization Using a Three-Dimensional Automated Breast Densitometry System Yoshida, Reika Yamauchi, Takenori Akashi-Tanaka, Sadako Matsuyanagi, Misaki Taruno, Kanae Sawada, Terumasa Kokaze, Akatsuki Nakamura, Seigo Curr Oncol Article Dense breasts are a risk factor for breast cancer. Assessment of breast density is important and radiologist-dependent. We objectively measured mammographic density using the three-dimensional automatic mammographic density measurement device Volpara™ and examined the criteria for combined use of ultrasonography (US). Of 1227 patients who underwent primary breast cancer surgery between January 2019 and April 2021 at our hospital, 441 were included. A case series study was conducted based on patient age, diagnostic accuracy, effects of mammography (MMG) combined with US, size of invasion, and calcifications. The mean density of both breasts according to the Volpara Density Grade (VDG) was 0–3.4% in 2 patients, 3.5–7.4% in 55 patients, 7.5–15.4% in 173 patients, and ≥15.5% in 211 patients. Breast density tended to be higher in younger patients. Diagnostic accuracy of MMG tended to decrease with increasing breast density. US detection rates were not associated with VDG on MMG and were favorable at all densities. The risk of a non-detected result was high in patients without malignant suspicious calcifications. Supplementary use of US for patients without suspicious calcifications on MMG and high breast density, particularly ≥25.5%, could improve the breast cancer detection rate. MDPI 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8700257/ /pubmed/34940087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060448 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yoshida, Reika
Yamauchi, Takenori
Akashi-Tanaka, Sadako
Matsuyanagi, Misaki
Taruno, Kanae
Sawada, Terumasa
Kokaze, Akatsuki
Nakamura, Seigo
Optimal Breast Density Characterization Using a Three-Dimensional Automated Breast Densitometry System
title Optimal Breast Density Characterization Using a Three-Dimensional Automated Breast Densitometry System
title_full Optimal Breast Density Characterization Using a Three-Dimensional Automated Breast Densitometry System
title_fullStr Optimal Breast Density Characterization Using a Three-Dimensional Automated Breast Densitometry System
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Breast Density Characterization Using a Three-Dimensional Automated Breast Densitometry System
title_short Optimal Breast Density Characterization Using a Three-Dimensional Automated Breast Densitometry System
title_sort optimal breast density characterization using a three-dimensional automated breast densitometry system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060448
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshidareika optimalbreastdensitycharacterizationusingathreedimensionalautomatedbreastdensitometrysystem
AT yamauchitakenori optimalbreastdensitycharacterizationusingathreedimensionalautomatedbreastdensitometrysystem
AT akashitanakasadako optimalbreastdensitycharacterizationusingathreedimensionalautomatedbreastdensitometrysystem
AT matsuyanagimisaki optimalbreastdensitycharacterizationusingathreedimensionalautomatedbreastdensitometrysystem
AT tarunokanae optimalbreastdensitycharacterizationusingathreedimensionalautomatedbreastdensitometrysystem
AT sawadaterumasa optimalbreastdensitycharacterizationusingathreedimensionalautomatedbreastdensitometrysystem
AT kokazeakatsuki optimalbreastdensitycharacterizationusingathreedimensionalautomatedbreastdensitometrysystem
AT nakamuraseigo optimalbreastdensitycharacterizationusingathreedimensionalautomatedbreastdensitometrysystem