Cargando…

Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies

To evaluate repeatability and agreement between various biometric parameters using 6 biometers based on different optical technologies. SETTING: University of Valencia, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. METHODS: 150 eyes were measured using the Aladdin, AL-Scan, Argos, IOLMaster70...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Montés-Micó, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34091551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000690
_version_ 1784620725258158080
author Montés-Micó, Robert
author_facet Montés-Micó, Robert
author_sort Montés-Micó, Robert
collection PubMed
description To evaluate repeatability and agreement between various biometric parameters using 6 biometers based on different optical technologies. SETTING: University of Valencia, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. METHODS: 150 eyes were measured using the Aladdin, AL-Scan, Argos, IOLMaster700, Lenstar LS900, and OA-2000 biometers. Keratometry (K1 and K2), J(0) and J(45), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), white to white (WTW), and pupil size (PS) were measured 5 times with each device. Intrasubject SD, coefficient of variability (CoV), coefficient of repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland -Altman graphs were analyzed. RESULTS: CoV values were <0.30% for K1, K2, and AL and up to 1.61% for CCT, ACD, LT, and WTW. PS values were higher (from 4.2% to 7.68%). There was statistically significant differences between biometers for all parameters evaluated (P < .001), and these differences varied as a function of the parameter analyzed. The limit of agreement (LoA) width of some comparisons for K1 and the majority for K2 were >0.50 diopter. A similar pattern was found for J(0)/J(45). For CCT, many comparisons showed LoA width values of >25 μm. The LoA width for ACD ranged from 0.366 mm to 0.175 mm and for LT was about 0.2 mm. AL showed a highest LoA width of 0.225 mm. The LoA width for WTW was, in most cases, about ≥0.50 mm. The LoA width for PS ranged from 1.578 mm to 3.541 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The 6 biometers provided repeatable measurements for the different parameters analyzed. The LoA obtained for each comparison should be analyzed carefully to consider the interchangeability of these devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8700306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87003062022-01-03 Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies Montés-Micó, Robert J Cataract Refract Surg Articles To evaluate repeatability and agreement between various biometric parameters using 6 biometers based on different optical technologies. SETTING: University of Valencia, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. METHODS: 150 eyes were measured using the Aladdin, AL-Scan, Argos, IOLMaster700, Lenstar LS900, and OA-2000 biometers. Keratometry (K1 and K2), J(0) and J(45), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), white to white (WTW), and pupil size (PS) were measured 5 times with each device. Intrasubject SD, coefficient of variability (CoV), coefficient of repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland -Altman graphs were analyzed. RESULTS: CoV values were <0.30% for K1, K2, and AL and up to 1.61% for CCT, ACD, LT, and WTW. PS values were higher (from 4.2% to 7.68%). There was statistically significant differences between biometers for all parameters evaluated (P < .001), and these differences varied as a function of the parameter analyzed. The limit of agreement (LoA) width of some comparisons for K1 and the majority for K2 were >0.50 diopter. A similar pattern was found for J(0)/J(45). For CCT, many comparisons showed LoA width values of >25 μm. The LoA width for ACD ranged from 0.366 mm to 0.175 mm and for LT was about 0.2 mm. AL showed a highest LoA width of 0.225 mm. The LoA width for WTW was, in most cases, about ≥0.50 mm. The LoA width for PS ranged from 1.578 mm to 3.541 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The 6 biometers provided repeatable measurements for the different parameters analyzed. The LoA obtained for each comparison should be analyzed carefully to consider the interchangeability of these devices. Wolters Kluwer 2022-01 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8700306/ /pubmed/34091551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000690 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Articles
Montés-Micó, Robert
Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies
title Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies
title_full Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies
title_fullStr Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies
title_short Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies
title_sort evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34091551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000690
work_keys_str_mv AT montesmicorobert evaluationof6biometersbasedondifferentopticaltechnologies