Cargando…

Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques

Shear bond strength (SBS) testing is a commonly used method for evaluating different dental adhesive systems. Failure mode analysis provides valuable information for better interpretation of bond strength results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of specimen dimension and loading...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ismail, Ahmed M., Bourauel, Christoph, ElBanna, Ahmed, Salah Eldin, Tarek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj9120140
_version_ 1784620743590412288
author Ismail, Ahmed M.
Bourauel, Christoph
ElBanna, Ahmed
Salah Eldin, Tarek
author_facet Ismail, Ahmed M.
Bourauel, Christoph
ElBanna, Ahmed
Salah Eldin, Tarek
author_sort Ismail, Ahmed M.
collection PubMed
description Shear bond strength (SBS) testing is a commonly used method for evaluating different dental adhesive systems. Failure mode analysis provides valuable information for better interpretation of bond strength results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of specimen dimension and loading technique on shear bond strength and failure mode results. Eighty macro and micro flowable composite cylindrical specimens of 1.8 and 0.8 mm diameter, respectively, and 1.5 mm length were bonded to dentinal substrate. Four study groups were created (n = 20): Macroshear wireloop, Gp1; Microshear wireloop, Gp2; Macroshear chisel, Gp3; and Microshear chisel, Gp4. They were tested for SBS using chisel and wireloop loading devices followed by failure mode analysis using digital microscopy and SEM. Two- and one-way ANOVA were used to compare stress at failure values of different groups while the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare between failure modes of the tested groups. Gp4 recorded the highest mean stress at failure 54.1 ± 14.1 MPa, and the highest percentage of adhesive failure in relation to the other groups. Specimen dimension and loading technique are important parameters influencing the results of shear bond strength. Micro-sized specimens and chisel loading are recommended for shear testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8700382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87003822021-12-24 Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques Ismail, Ahmed M. Bourauel, Christoph ElBanna, Ahmed Salah Eldin, Tarek Dent J (Basel) Article Shear bond strength (SBS) testing is a commonly used method for evaluating different dental adhesive systems. Failure mode analysis provides valuable information for better interpretation of bond strength results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of specimen dimension and loading technique on shear bond strength and failure mode results. Eighty macro and micro flowable composite cylindrical specimens of 1.8 and 0.8 mm diameter, respectively, and 1.5 mm length were bonded to dentinal substrate. Four study groups were created (n = 20): Macroshear wireloop, Gp1; Microshear wireloop, Gp2; Macroshear chisel, Gp3; and Microshear chisel, Gp4. They were tested for SBS using chisel and wireloop loading devices followed by failure mode analysis using digital microscopy and SEM. Two- and one-way ANOVA were used to compare stress at failure values of different groups while the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare between failure modes of the tested groups. Gp4 recorded the highest mean stress at failure 54.1 ± 14.1 MPa, and the highest percentage of adhesive failure in relation to the other groups. Specimen dimension and loading technique are important parameters influencing the results of shear bond strength. Micro-sized specimens and chisel loading are recommended for shear testing. MDPI 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8700382/ /pubmed/34940037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj9120140 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ismail, Ahmed M.
Bourauel, Christoph
ElBanna, Ahmed
Salah Eldin, Tarek
Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques
title Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques
title_full Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques
title_fullStr Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques
title_short Micro versus Macro Shear Bond Strength Testing of Dentin-Composite Interface Using Chisel and Wireloop Loading Techniques
title_sort micro versus macro shear bond strength testing of dentin-composite interface using chisel and wireloop loading techniques
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj9120140
work_keys_str_mv AT ismailahmedm microversusmacroshearbondstrengthtestingofdentincompositeinterfaceusingchiselandwirelooploadingtechniques
AT bourauelchristoph microversusmacroshearbondstrengthtestingofdentincompositeinterfaceusingchiselandwirelooploadingtechniques
AT elbannaahmed microversusmacroshearbondstrengthtestingofdentincompositeinterfaceusingchiselandwirelooploadingtechniques
AT salaheldintarek microversusmacroshearbondstrengthtestingofdentincompositeinterfaceusingchiselandwirelooploadingtechniques