Cargando…

The Added Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Physicians’ Performance in Detecting Thoracic Pathologies on CT and Chest X-ray: A Systematic Review

Our systematic review investigated the additional effect of artificial intelligence-based devices on human observers when diagnosing and/or detecting thoracic pathologies using different diagnostic imaging modalities, such as chest X-ray and CT. Peer-reviewed, original research articles from EMBASE,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Dana, Pehrson, Lea Marie, Lauridsen, Carsten Ammitzbøl, Tøttrup, Lea, Fraccaro, Marco, Elliott, Desmond, Zając, Hubert Dariusz, Darkner, Sune, Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik, Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943442
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122206
_version_ 1784620751321563136
author Li, Dana
Pehrson, Lea Marie
Lauridsen, Carsten Ammitzbøl
Tøttrup, Lea
Fraccaro, Marco
Elliott, Desmond
Zając, Hubert Dariusz
Darkner, Sune
Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
author_facet Li, Dana
Pehrson, Lea Marie
Lauridsen, Carsten Ammitzbøl
Tøttrup, Lea
Fraccaro, Marco
Elliott, Desmond
Zając, Hubert Dariusz
Darkner, Sune
Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
author_sort Li, Dana
collection PubMed
description Our systematic review investigated the additional effect of artificial intelligence-based devices on human observers when diagnosing and/or detecting thoracic pathologies using different diagnostic imaging modalities, such as chest X-ray and CT. Peer-reviewed, original research articles from EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were retrieved. Included articles were published within the last 20 years and used a device based on artificial intelligence (AI) technology to detect or diagnose pulmonary findings. The AI-based device had to be used in an observer test where the performance of human observers with and without addition of the device was measured as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, or time spent on image reading. A total of 38 studies were included for final assessment. The quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) was used for bias assessment. The average sensitivity increased from 67.8% to 74.6%; specificity from 82.2% to 85.4%; accuracy from 75.4% to 81.7%; and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) from 0.75 to 0.80. Generally, a faster reading time was reported when radiologists were aided by AI-based devices. Our systematic review showed that performance generally improved for the physicians when assisted by AI-based devices compared to unaided interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8700414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87004142021-12-24 The Added Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Physicians’ Performance in Detecting Thoracic Pathologies on CT and Chest X-ray: A Systematic Review Li, Dana Pehrson, Lea Marie Lauridsen, Carsten Ammitzbøl Tøttrup, Lea Fraccaro, Marco Elliott, Desmond Zając, Hubert Dariusz Darkner, Sune Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik Nielsen, Michael Bachmann Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review Our systematic review investigated the additional effect of artificial intelligence-based devices on human observers when diagnosing and/or detecting thoracic pathologies using different diagnostic imaging modalities, such as chest X-ray and CT. Peer-reviewed, original research articles from EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were retrieved. Included articles were published within the last 20 years and used a device based on artificial intelligence (AI) technology to detect or diagnose pulmonary findings. The AI-based device had to be used in an observer test where the performance of human observers with and without addition of the device was measured as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, or time spent on image reading. A total of 38 studies were included for final assessment. The quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) was used for bias assessment. The average sensitivity increased from 67.8% to 74.6%; specificity from 82.2% to 85.4%; accuracy from 75.4% to 81.7%; and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) from 0.75 to 0.80. Generally, a faster reading time was reported when radiologists were aided by AI-based devices. Our systematic review showed that performance generally improved for the physicians when assisted by AI-based devices compared to unaided interpretation. MDPI 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8700414/ /pubmed/34943442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122206 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Li, Dana
Pehrson, Lea Marie
Lauridsen, Carsten Ammitzbøl
Tøttrup, Lea
Fraccaro, Marco
Elliott, Desmond
Zając, Hubert Dariusz
Darkner, Sune
Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
The Added Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Physicians’ Performance in Detecting Thoracic Pathologies on CT and Chest X-ray: A Systematic Review
title The Added Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Physicians’ Performance in Detecting Thoracic Pathologies on CT and Chest X-ray: A Systematic Review
title_full The Added Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Physicians’ Performance in Detecting Thoracic Pathologies on CT and Chest X-ray: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Added Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Physicians’ Performance in Detecting Thoracic Pathologies on CT and Chest X-ray: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Added Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Physicians’ Performance in Detecting Thoracic Pathologies on CT and Chest X-ray: A Systematic Review
title_short The Added Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Physicians’ Performance in Detecting Thoracic Pathologies on CT and Chest X-ray: A Systematic Review
title_sort added effect of artificial intelligence on physicians’ performance in detecting thoracic pathologies on ct and chest x-ray: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943442
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122206
work_keys_str_mv AT lidana theaddedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT pehrsonleamarie theaddedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT lauridsencarstenammitzbøl theaddedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT tøttruplea theaddedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT fraccaromarco theaddedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT elliottdesmond theaddedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT zajachubertdariusz theaddedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT darknersune theaddedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT carlsenjonathanfrederik theaddedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT nielsenmichaelbachmann theaddedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT lidana addedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT pehrsonleamarie addedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT lauridsencarstenammitzbøl addedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT tøttruplea addedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT fraccaromarco addedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT elliottdesmond addedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT zajachubertdariusz addedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT darknersune addedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT carlsenjonathanfrederik addedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview
AT nielsenmichaelbachmann addedeffectofartificialintelligenceonphysiciansperformanceindetectingthoracicpathologiesonctandchestxrayasystematicreview