Cargando…

Multicenter Evaluation of Rapid BACpro(®) II for the Accurate Identification of Microorganisms Directly from Blood Cultures Using MALDI-TOF MS

The identification of microorganisms directly from blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS has been shown to be the most impacting application of this methodology. In this study, a novel commercial method was evaluated in four clinical microbiology laboratories. Positive blood culture samples (n = 801) we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oviaño, Marina, Ingebretsen, André, Steffensen, Anne K., Croxatto, Antony, Prod’hom, Guy, Quiroga, Lidia, Bou, Germán, Greub, Gilbert, Rodríguez-Temporal, David, Rodríguez-Sánchez, Belén
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943488
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122251
Descripción
Sumario:The identification of microorganisms directly from blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS has been shown to be the most impacting application of this methodology. In this study, a novel commercial method was evaluated in four clinical microbiology laboratories. Positive blood culture samples (n = 801) were processed using a rapid BACpro(®) II kit and then compared with the routine gold standard. A subset of monomicrobial BCs (n = 560) were analyzed in parallel with a Sepsityper(®) Kit (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and compared with the rapid BACpro(®) II kit. In addition, this kit was also compared with two different in-house methods. Overall, 80.0% of the monomicrobial isolates (609/761; 95% CI 71.5–88.5) were correctly identified by the rapid BACpro(®) II kit at the species level (92.3% of the Gram negative and 72.4% of the Gram positive bacteria). The comparison with the Sepsityper(®) Kit showed that the rapid BACpro(®) II kit generated higher rates of correct species-level identification for all categories (p > 0.0001), except for yeasts identified with score values > 1.7. It also proved superior to the ammonium chloride method (p > 0.0001), but the differential centrifugation method allowed for higher rates of correct identification for Gram negative bacteria (p > 0.1). The percentage of accurate species-level identification of Gram positive bacteria was particularly noteworthy in comparison with other commercial and in-house methods.