Cargando…
How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?
Digital morphology (DM) analyzers are widely applied in clinical practice. It is necessary to evaluate performances of DM analyzers by focusing on leukopenic samples. We evaluated the analytical performance, including precision, of a Sysmex DI-60 system (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) on white blood cell (WBC...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122173 |
_version_ | 1784620818578276352 |
---|---|
author | Yoon, Sumi Hur, Mina Lee, Gun Hyuk Nam, Minjeong Kim, Hanah |
author_facet | Yoon, Sumi Hur, Mina Lee, Gun Hyuk Nam, Minjeong Kim, Hanah |
author_sort | Yoon, Sumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Digital morphology (DM) analyzers are widely applied in clinical practice. It is necessary to evaluate performances of DM analyzers by focusing on leukopenic samples. We evaluated the analytical performance, including precision, of a Sysmex DI-60 system (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) on white blood cell (WBC) differentials in leukopenic samples. In a total of 40 peripheral blood smears divided into four groups according to WBC count (normal, mild, moderate, and severe leukopenia; each group n = 10), we evaluated precision of WBC preclassificaiton by DI-60. %coefficients of variation (%CVs) of precision varied for each sample and for each cell class; the fewer cells per slide, the higher %CV. The overall specificity and efficiency were high for all cell classes except plasma cells (95.9–99.9% and 90.0–99.4%, respectively). The largest absolute value of mean difference between DI-60 and manual count in each group was: 10.77, normal; 10.22, mild leukopenia; 19.09, moderate leukopenia; 47.74, severe leukopenia. This is the first study that evaluated the analytical performance of DI-60 on WBC differentials in leukopenic samples as the main subject. DI-60 showed significantly different performance depending on WBC count. DM analyzers should be evaluated separately in leukopenic samples, even if the overall performance was acceptable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8700691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87006912021-12-24 How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples? Yoon, Sumi Hur, Mina Lee, Gun Hyuk Nam, Minjeong Kim, Hanah Diagnostics (Basel) Article Digital morphology (DM) analyzers are widely applied in clinical practice. It is necessary to evaluate performances of DM analyzers by focusing on leukopenic samples. We evaluated the analytical performance, including precision, of a Sysmex DI-60 system (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) on white blood cell (WBC) differentials in leukopenic samples. In a total of 40 peripheral blood smears divided into four groups according to WBC count (normal, mild, moderate, and severe leukopenia; each group n = 10), we evaluated precision of WBC preclassificaiton by DI-60. %coefficients of variation (%CVs) of precision varied for each sample and for each cell class; the fewer cells per slide, the higher %CV. The overall specificity and efficiency were high for all cell classes except plasma cells (95.9–99.9% and 90.0–99.4%, respectively). The largest absolute value of mean difference between DI-60 and manual count in each group was: 10.77, normal; 10.22, mild leukopenia; 19.09, moderate leukopenia; 47.74, severe leukopenia. This is the first study that evaluated the analytical performance of DI-60 on WBC differentials in leukopenic samples as the main subject. DI-60 showed significantly different performance depending on WBC count. DM analyzers should be evaluated separately in leukopenic samples, even if the overall performance was acceptable. MDPI 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8700691/ /pubmed/34943409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122173 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yoon, Sumi Hur, Mina Lee, Gun Hyuk Nam, Minjeong Kim, Hanah How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples? |
title | How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples? |
title_full | How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples? |
title_fullStr | How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples? |
title_full_unstemmed | How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples? |
title_short | How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples? |
title_sort | how reproducible is the data from sysmex di-60 in leukopenic samples? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoonsumi howreproducibleisthedatafromsysmexdi60inleukopenicsamples AT hurmina howreproducibleisthedatafromsysmexdi60inleukopenicsamples AT leegunhyuk howreproducibleisthedatafromsysmexdi60inleukopenicsamples AT namminjeong howreproducibleisthedatafromsysmexdi60inleukopenicsamples AT kimhanah howreproducibleisthedatafromsysmexdi60inleukopenicsamples |