Cargando…

How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?

Digital morphology (DM) analyzers are widely applied in clinical practice. It is necessary to evaluate performances of DM analyzers by focusing on leukopenic samples. We evaluated the analytical performance, including precision, of a Sysmex DI-60 system (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) on white blood cell (WBC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoon, Sumi, Hur, Mina, Lee, Gun Hyuk, Nam, Minjeong, Kim, Hanah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122173
_version_ 1784620818578276352
author Yoon, Sumi
Hur, Mina
Lee, Gun Hyuk
Nam, Minjeong
Kim, Hanah
author_facet Yoon, Sumi
Hur, Mina
Lee, Gun Hyuk
Nam, Minjeong
Kim, Hanah
author_sort Yoon, Sumi
collection PubMed
description Digital morphology (DM) analyzers are widely applied in clinical practice. It is necessary to evaluate performances of DM analyzers by focusing on leukopenic samples. We evaluated the analytical performance, including precision, of a Sysmex DI-60 system (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) on white blood cell (WBC) differentials in leukopenic samples. In a total of 40 peripheral blood smears divided into four groups according to WBC count (normal, mild, moderate, and severe leukopenia; each group n = 10), we evaluated precision of WBC preclassificaiton by DI-60. %coefficients of variation (%CVs) of precision varied for each sample and for each cell class; the fewer cells per slide, the higher %CV. The overall specificity and efficiency were high for all cell classes except plasma cells (95.9–99.9% and 90.0–99.4%, respectively). The largest absolute value of mean difference between DI-60 and manual count in each group was: 10.77, normal; 10.22, mild leukopenia; 19.09, moderate leukopenia; 47.74, severe leukopenia. This is the first study that evaluated the analytical performance of DI-60 on WBC differentials in leukopenic samples as the main subject. DI-60 showed significantly different performance depending on WBC count. DM analyzers should be evaluated separately in leukopenic samples, even if the overall performance was acceptable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8700691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87006912021-12-24 How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples? Yoon, Sumi Hur, Mina Lee, Gun Hyuk Nam, Minjeong Kim, Hanah Diagnostics (Basel) Article Digital morphology (DM) analyzers are widely applied in clinical practice. It is necessary to evaluate performances of DM analyzers by focusing on leukopenic samples. We evaluated the analytical performance, including precision, of a Sysmex DI-60 system (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) on white blood cell (WBC) differentials in leukopenic samples. In a total of 40 peripheral blood smears divided into four groups according to WBC count (normal, mild, moderate, and severe leukopenia; each group n = 10), we evaluated precision of WBC preclassificaiton by DI-60. %coefficients of variation (%CVs) of precision varied for each sample and for each cell class; the fewer cells per slide, the higher %CV. The overall specificity and efficiency were high for all cell classes except plasma cells (95.9–99.9% and 90.0–99.4%, respectively). The largest absolute value of mean difference between DI-60 and manual count in each group was: 10.77, normal; 10.22, mild leukopenia; 19.09, moderate leukopenia; 47.74, severe leukopenia. This is the first study that evaluated the analytical performance of DI-60 on WBC differentials in leukopenic samples as the main subject. DI-60 showed significantly different performance depending on WBC count. DM analyzers should be evaluated separately in leukopenic samples, even if the overall performance was acceptable. MDPI 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8700691/ /pubmed/34943409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122173 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yoon, Sumi
Hur, Mina
Lee, Gun Hyuk
Nam, Minjeong
Kim, Hanah
How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?
title How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?
title_full How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?
title_fullStr How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?
title_full_unstemmed How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?
title_short How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?
title_sort how reproducible is the data from sysmex di-60 in leukopenic samples?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122173
work_keys_str_mv AT yoonsumi howreproducibleisthedatafromsysmexdi60inleukopenicsamples
AT hurmina howreproducibleisthedatafromsysmexdi60inleukopenicsamples
AT leegunhyuk howreproducibleisthedatafromsysmexdi60inleukopenicsamples
AT namminjeong howreproducibleisthedatafromsysmexdi60inleukopenicsamples
AT kimhanah howreproducibleisthedatafromsysmexdi60inleukopenicsamples