Cargando…

Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae

Knowledge about fasciae has become increasingly relevant in connection to regional anesthesiology, given the growing interest in fascial plane, interfascial, and nerve blocks. Ultrasound (US) imaging, thanks to high definition, provides the possibility to visualize and measure their thickness. The p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pirri, Carmelo, Guidolin, Diego, Fede, Caterina, Macchi, Veronica, De Caro, Raffaele, Stecco, Carla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122261
_version_ 1784620833442889728
author Pirri, Carmelo
Guidolin, Diego
Fede, Caterina
Macchi, Veronica
De Caro, Raffaele
Stecco, Carla
author_facet Pirri, Carmelo
Guidolin, Diego
Fede, Caterina
Macchi, Veronica
De Caro, Raffaele
Stecco, Carla
author_sort Pirri, Carmelo
collection PubMed
description Knowledge about fasciae has become increasingly relevant in connection to regional anesthesiology, given the growing interest in fascial plane, interfascial, and nerve blocks. Ultrasound (US) imaging, thanks to high definition, provides the possibility to visualize and measure their thickness. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare, by US imaging, the thickness of deep/muscular fasciae in different points of the arm and forearm. An observational study has been performed using US imaging to measure brachial and antebrachial fasciae thickness at anterior and posterior regions, respectively, of the arm and forearm at different levels with a new protocol in a sample of 25 healthy volunteers. Results of fascial thickness revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) in the brachial fascia between the anterior and the posterior regions; in terms of the antebrachial fascia, no statistically significant difference was present (p > 0.05) between the regions/levels. Moreover, regarding the posterior region/levels, the brachial fascia had a greater thickness (mean 0.81 ± 0.20 mm) than the antebrachial fascia (mean 0.71 ± 0.20 mm); regarding the anterior region/levels, the antebrachial fascia was thicker (mean 0.70 ± 0.2 mm) than the brachial fascia (mean 0.61 ± 0.11 mm). In addition, the intra-rater reliability reported good reliability (ICC(2,k): 0.88). US imaging helps to improve grading of fascial dysfunction or disease by revealing subclinical lesions, clinically invisible fascial changes, and one of the US parameters to reliably evaluate is the thickness in the different regions and levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8700752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87007522021-12-24 Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae Pirri, Carmelo Guidolin, Diego Fede, Caterina Macchi, Veronica De Caro, Raffaele Stecco, Carla Diagnostics (Basel) Article Knowledge about fasciae has become increasingly relevant in connection to regional anesthesiology, given the growing interest in fascial plane, interfascial, and nerve blocks. Ultrasound (US) imaging, thanks to high definition, provides the possibility to visualize and measure their thickness. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare, by US imaging, the thickness of deep/muscular fasciae in different points of the arm and forearm. An observational study has been performed using US imaging to measure brachial and antebrachial fasciae thickness at anterior and posterior regions, respectively, of the arm and forearm at different levels with a new protocol in a sample of 25 healthy volunteers. Results of fascial thickness revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) in the brachial fascia between the anterior and the posterior regions; in terms of the antebrachial fascia, no statistically significant difference was present (p > 0.05) between the regions/levels. Moreover, regarding the posterior region/levels, the brachial fascia had a greater thickness (mean 0.81 ± 0.20 mm) than the antebrachial fascia (mean 0.71 ± 0.20 mm); regarding the anterior region/levels, the antebrachial fascia was thicker (mean 0.70 ± 0.2 mm) than the brachial fascia (mean 0.61 ± 0.11 mm). In addition, the intra-rater reliability reported good reliability (ICC(2,k): 0.88). US imaging helps to improve grading of fascial dysfunction or disease by revealing subclinical lesions, clinically invisible fascial changes, and one of the US parameters to reliably evaluate is the thickness in the different regions and levels. MDPI 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8700752/ /pubmed/34943498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122261 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pirri, Carmelo
Guidolin, Diego
Fede, Caterina
Macchi, Veronica
De Caro, Raffaele
Stecco, Carla
Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae
title Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae
title_full Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae
title_fullStr Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae
title_short Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae
title_sort ultrasound imaging of brachial and antebrachial fasciae
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122261
work_keys_str_mv AT pirricarmelo ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae
AT guidolindiego ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae
AT fedecaterina ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae
AT macchiveronica ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae
AT decaroraffaele ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae
AT steccocarla ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae