Cargando…
Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae
Knowledge about fasciae has become increasingly relevant in connection to regional anesthesiology, given the growing interest in fascial plane, interfascial, and nerve blocks. Ultrasound (US) imaging, thanks to high definition, provides the possibility to visualize and measure their thickness. The p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122261 |
_version_ | 1784620833442889728 |
---|---|
author | Pirri, Carmelo Guidolin, Diego Fede, Caterina Macchi, Veronica De Caro, Raffaele Stecco, Carla |
author_facet | Pirri, Carmelo Guidolin, Diego Fede, Caterina Macchi, Veronica De Caro, Raffaele Stecco, Carla |
author_sort | Pirri, Carmelo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Knowledge about fasciae has become increasingly relevant in connection to regional anesthesiology, given the growing interest in fascial plane, interfascial, and nerve blocks. Ultrasound (US) imaging, thanks to high definition, provides the possibility to visualize and measure their thickness. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare, by US imaging, the thickness of deep/muscular fasciae in different points of the arm and forearm. An observational study has been performed using US imaging to measure brachial and antebrachial fasciae thickness at anterior and posterior regions, respectively, of the arm and forearm at different levels with a new protocol in a sample of 25 healthy volunteers. Results of fascial thickness revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) in the brachial fascia between the anterior and the posterior regions; in terms of the antebrachial fascia, no statistically significant difference was present (p > 0.05) between the regions/levels. Moreover, regarding the posterior region/levels, the brachial fascia had a greater thickness (mean 0.81 ± 0.20 mm) than the antebrachial fascia (mean 0.71 ± 0.20 mm); regarding the anterior region/levels, the antebrachial fascia was thicker (mean 0.70 ± 0.2 mm) than the brachial fascia (mean 0.61 ± 0.11 mm). In addition, the intra-rater reliability reported good reliability (ICC(2,k): 0.88). US imaging helps to improve grading of fascial dysfunction or disease by revealing subclinical lesions, clinically invisible fascial changes, and one of the US parameters to reliably evaluate is the thickness in the different regions and levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8700752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87007522021-12-24 Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae Pirri, Carmelo Guidolin, Diego Fede, Caterina Macchi, Veronica De Caro, Raffaele Stecco, Carla Diagnostics (Basel) Article Knowledge about fasciae has become increasingly relevant in connection to regional anesthesiology, given the growing interest in fascial plane, interfascial, and nerve blocks. Ultrasound (US) imaging, thanks to high definition, provides the possibility to visualize and measure their thickness. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare, by US imaging, the thickness of deep/muscular fasciae in different points of the arm and forearm. An observational study has been performed using US imaging to measure brachial and antebrachial fasciae thickness at anterior and posterior regions, respectively, of the arm and forearm at different levels with a new protocol in a sample of 25 healthy volunteers. Results of fascial thickness revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) in the brachial fascia between the anterior and the posterior regions; in terms of the antebrachial fascia, no statistically significant difference was present (p > 0.05) between the regions/levels. Moreover, regarding the posterior region/levels, the brachial fascia had a greater thickness (mean 0.81 ± 0.20 mm) than the antebrachial fascia (mean 0.71 ± 0.20 mm); regarding the anterior region/levels, the antebrachial fascia was thicker (mean 0.70 ± 0.2 mm) than the brachial fascia (mean 0.61 ± 0.11 mm). In addition, the intra-rater reliability reported good reliability (ICC(2,k): 0.88). US imaging helps to improve grading of fascial dysfunction or disease by revealing subclinical lesions, clinically invisible fascial changes, and one of the US parameters to reliably evaluate is the thickness in the different regions and levels. MDPI 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8700752/ /pubmed/34943498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122261 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pirri, Carmelo Guidolin, Diego Fede, Caterina Macchi, Veronica De Caro, Raffaele Stecco, Carla Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae |
title | Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae |
title_full | Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae |
title_short | Ultrasound Imaging of Brachial and Antebrachial Fasciae |
title_sort | ultrasound imaging of brachial and antebrachial fasciae |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pirricarmelo ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae AT guidolindiego ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae AT fedecaterina ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae AT macchiveronica ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae AT decaroraffaele ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae AT steccocarla ultrasoundimagingofbrachialandantebrachialfasciae |