Cargando…

Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000–2020

This paper used 1526 works from the literature on disaster risk perception from 2000 to 2020 in the Web of Science core collection database as the research subject. The CiteSpace knowledge graph analysis tool was used to visual analyze the country, author, institution, discipline distribution, keywo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Tianlong, Yang, Hao, Luo, Xiaowei, Jiang, Yifeng, Wu, Xiang, Gao, Jingqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34948613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413003
_version_ 1784620921934315520
author Yu, Tianlong
Yang, Hao
Luo, Xiaowei
Jiang, Yifeng
Wu, Xiang
Gao, Jingqi
author_facet Yu, Tianlong
Yang, Hao
Luo, Xiaowei
Jiang, Yifeng
Wu, Xiang
Gao, Jingqi
author_sort Yu, Tianlong
collection PubMed
description This paper used 1526 works from the literature on disaster risk perception from 2000 to 2020 in the Web of Science core collection database as the research subject. The CiteSpace knowledge graph analysis tool was used to visual analyze the country, author, institution, discipline distribution, keywords, and keyword clustering mapping. The paper drew the following conclusions. Firstly, disaster risk perception research has experienced three stages of steady development, undulating growth, and rapid growth. Secondly, the field of disaster risk perception was mainly concentrated in the disciplines of engineering, natural science, and management science. Thirdly, meteorological disasters, earthquakes, nuclear radiation, and epidemics were the main disasters in the field of disaster risk perception. Residents and adolescents were the main subjects of research in the field of disaster risk perception. Fourthly, research on human risk behavior and risk psychology and research on disaster risk control and emergency management were two major research hotspots in the field of disaster risk perception. Finally, the research field of disaster risk perception is constantly expanding. There is a trend from theory to application and multi-perspective combination, and future research on disaster risk perception will be presented more systematically. The conclusion can provide a reference for disaster risk perception research, as well as directions for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8701115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87011152021-12-24 Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000–2020 Yu, Tianlong Yang, Hao Luo, Xiaowei Jiang, Yifeng Wu, Xiang Gao, Jingqi Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This paper used 1526 works from the literature on disaster risk perception from 2000 to 2020 in the Web of Science core collection database as the research subject. The CiteSpace knowledge graph analysis tool was used to visual analyze the country, author, institution, discipline distribution, keywords, and keyword clustering mapping. The paper drew the following conclusions. Firstly, disaster risk perception research has experienced three stages of steady development, undulating growth, and rapid growth. Secondly, the field of disaster risk perception was mainly concentrated in the disciplines of engineering, natural science, and management science. Thirdly, meteorological disasters, earthquakes, nuclear radiation, and epidemics were the main disasters in the field of disaster risk perception. Residents and adolescents were the main subjects of research in the field of disaster risk perception. Fourthly, research on human risk behavior and risk psychology and research on disaster risk control and emergency management were two major research hotspots in the field of disaster risk perception. Finally, the research field of disaster risk perception is constantly expanding. There is a trend from theory to application and multi-perspective combination, and future research on disaster risk perception will be presented more systematically. The conclusion can provide a reference for disaster risk perception research, as well as directions for future research. MDPI 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8701115/ /pubmed/34948613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413003 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yu, Tianlong
Yang, Hao
Luo, Xiaowei
Jiang, Yifeng
Wu, Xiang
Gao, Jingqi
Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000–2020
title Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000–2020
title_full Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000–2020
title_fullStr Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000–2020
title_full_unstemmed Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000–2020
title_short Scientometric Analysis of Disaster Risk Perception: 2000–2020
title_sort scientometric analysis of disaster risk perception: 2000–2020
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34948613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413003
work_keys_str_mv AT yutianlong scientometricanalysisofdisasterriskperception20002020
AT yanghao scientometricanalysisofdisasterriskperception20002020
AT luoxiaowei scientometricanalysisofdisasterriskperception20002020
AT jiangyifeng scientometricanalysisofdisasterriskperception20002020
AT wuxiang scientometricanalysisofdisasterriskperception20002020
AT gaojingqi scientometricanalysisofdisasterriskperception20002020