Cargando…

Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) As a Risk for COVI19 Compared to Those without SCD Among Patients Admitted in a Large Urban Center, As Estimated By PCR Sars-v-2 Positive Vs Negative Testing

A diagnosis of SCD is considered to be at risk for COVD19. To further define the association between SCD and infection with COVID-19, we estimated risk, by comparing presence or absence of COVID19 infections in individuals with and without SCD admitted concurrently to a large urban health care facil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adamkiewicz, Tom, Mubasher, Mohamed, Omole, Folashade, Echols, Melvin R., Payne, Jason, Leak-Johnson, Tennille, Morgan-Billingslea, Jan, Pines, Kathy, Sundal, Deborah A., Krebs, Shira, Chang, Eric, Afranie-Sakyi, Jennifer A, Flenaugh, Eric, Volcy, Judith, Garcia, Marlene, Tewolde, Teclemichael, Driss, Adel, Gbinigie, Olusola, Evans, Chad, Harvey, Marques, Alema-Mensah, Ernest, Bryan, Dennis, Majett, Charlye D., Taylor, Herman Alfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701606/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2021-148846
_version_ 1784621042891751424
author Adamkiewicz, Tom
Mubasher, Mohamed
Omole, Folashade
Echols, Melvin R.
Payne, Jason
Leak-Johnson, Tennille
Morgan-Billingslea, Jan
Pines, Kathy
Sundal, Deborah A.
Krebs, Shira
Chang, Eric
Afranie-Sakyi, Jennifer A
Flenaugh, Eric
Volcy, Judith
Garcia, Marlene
Tewolde, Teclemichael
Driss, Adel
Gbinigie, Olusola
Evans, Chad
Harvey, Marques
Alema-Mensah, Ernest
Bryan, Dennis
Majett, Charlye D.
Taylor, Herman Alfred
author_facet Adamkiewicz, Tom
Mubasher, Mohamed
Omole, Folashade
Echols, Melvin R.
Payne, Jason
Leak-Johnson, Tennille
Morgan-Billingslea, Jan
Pines, Kathy
Sundal, Deborah A.
Krebs, Shira
Chang, Eric
Afranie-Sakyi, Jennifer A
Flenaugh, Eric
Volcy, Judith
Garcia, Marlene
Tewolde, Teclemichael
Driss, Adel
Gbinigie, Olusola
Evans, Chad
Harvey, Marques
Alema-Mensah, Ernest
Bryan, Dennis
Majett, Charlye D.
Taylor, Herman Alfred
author_sort Adamkiewicz, Tom
collection PubMed
description A diagnosis of SCD is considered to be at risk for COVD19. To further define the association between SCD and infection with COVID-19, we estimated risk, by comparing presence or absence of COVID19 infections in individuals with and without SCD admitted concurrently to a large urban health care facility (Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA; 960 beds, 5th largest public hospital in the US). Primary outcome was a positive or negative COVID-19 diagnosis as defined bySARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. A patient was considered to be COVID-19 positive if tested positive withSARS-CoV-2 PCR for the first time, anytime during the study period, irrespective of number of tests. A patient was considered to be COVID-19 negative if patient had no positive tests during the study period, and had one or moreSARS-CoV-2 PCR negative tests. For COVID19 positive patients, the admission of theSARS-CoV-2 PCR positive test was included in the analysis. For COVID19 negative patients, the first admission with aSARS-CoV-2 PCR negative test was considered for analysis. For this interim analysis, SCD was defined by ICD10 and registry data. Clinical diagnosis such as obesity and respiratory failure were defined by ICD10 coding. Data was obtained from quarterly centralized Epic EMR data extractions. Analysis of outcome of COVID19 positive vs negatives was stratified in four separate analysis: all admissions, ICU admissions, those with respiratory failure and those who died. Multivariate dichotomous logistic regression analyses modeled binary outcome effect of SCD, adjusted for age (<40 vs. > 40 years), sex at birth (females vs. males) and obesity (SAS version 9.4 was used for statistical analyses and overall significance level was set at 0.05). To ensure population homogeneity analysis was conducted on patient ages 20 to 60 years that were Black/African American and admitted from the Emergency Department for a short stay and/or the medicine service (variable interactions at a p<0.01). The study was approved by the institutional review board and by the hospital research oversight committee. Overall, between 3/23/2020 and 6/30/2020, 23697 patients were admitted once or more to Grady Memorial Hospital with one or more PCR sars-cov-2 test, of these 405 were patients with SCD (1.7%). Of the total, 2566 patients (10.8%) tested positive for COVID-19, and 48 patients with SCD (11.8%) were positive. Of 7041 (29.7%) were part of the study population, 332 (4.7%) where patients with SCD (hemoglobin [hb] SS/Sbeta0 =252, hbSC n=55, hbS beta thalassemia+ or hbS beta thalassemia undetermined n=21). Among patients without SCD, 36.3% were female, (n=2557) and among patients with SCD, 53.6% (n=178). The mean age of patients without SCD was: 51.1 years (standard deviation [std]) +/- 19.5 years), and for those with SCD: 35.0 years (std +/- 12.0 years). Results of univariate and multivariate analysis are presented in the table. In conclusion, in a Black/African American patients admitted from the Emergency Room for observation and/or the internal medicine service, when adjusted for age, gender and obesity, with SCD are at a significant increased risk for admissions with COVID-19 infection in general as well as ICU admission or admission with respiratory failures. Further studies can help articulate the risk associated with SCD as well as its potential interaction with other factors, with attention to confounders. [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8701606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87016062021-12-28 Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) As a Risk for COVI19 Compared to Those without SCD Among Patients Admitted in a Large Urban Center, As Estimated By PCR Sars-v-2 Positive Vs Negative Testing Adamkiewicz, Tom Mubasher, Mohamed Omole, Folashade Echols, Melvin R. Payne, Jason Leak-Johnson, Tennille Morgan-Billingslea, Jan Pines, Kathy Sundal, Deborah A. Krebs, Shira Chang, Eric Afranie-Sakyi, Jennifer A Flenaugh, Eric Volcy, Judith Garcia, Marlene Tewolde, Teclemichael Driss, Adel Gbinigie, Olusola Evans, Chad Harvey, Marques Alema-Mensah, Ernest Bryan, Dennis Majett, Charlye D. Taylor, Herman Alfred Blood 114.Hemoglobinopathies, Excluding Thalassemia: Clinical and Epidemiological A diagnosis of SCD is considered to be at risk for COVD19. To further define the association between SCD and infection with COVID-19, we estimated risk, by comparing presence or absence of COVID19 infections in individuals with and without SCD admitted concurrently to a large urban health care facility (Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA; 960 beds, 5th largest public hospital in the US). Primary outcome was a positive or negative COVID-19 diagnosis as defined bySARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. A patient was considered to be COVID-19 positive if tested positive withSARS-CoV-2 PCR for the first time, anytime during the study period, irrespective of number of tests. A patient was considered to be COVID-19 negative if patient had no positive tests during the study period, and had one or moreSARS-CoV-2 PCR negative tests. For COVID19 positive patients, the admission of theSARS-CoV-2 PCR positive test was included in the analysis. For COVID19 negative patients, the first admission with aSARS-CoV-2 PCR negative test was considered for analysis. For this interim analysis, SCD was defined by ICD10 and registry data. Clinical diagnosis such as obesity and respiratory failure were defined by ICD10 coding. Data was obtained from quarterly centralized Epic EMR data extractions. Analysis of outcome of COVID19 positive vs negatives was stratified in four separate analysis: all admissions, ICU admissions, those with respiratory failure and those who died. Multivariate dichotomous logistic regression analyses modeled binary outcome effect of SCD, adjusted for age (<40 vs. > 40 years), sex at birth (females vs. males) and obesity (SAS version 9.4 was used for statistical analyses and overall significance level was set at 0.05). To ensure population homogeneity analysis was conducted on patient ages 20 to 60 years that were Black/African American and admitted from the Emergency Department for a short stay and/or the medicine service (variable interactions at a p<0.01). The study was approved by the institutional review board and by the hospital research oversight committee. Overall, between 3/23/2020 and 6/30/2020, 23697 patients were admitted once or more to Grady Memorial Hospital with one or more PCR sars-cov-2 test, of these 405 were patients with SCD (1.7%). Of the total, 2566 patients (10.8%) tested positive for COVID-19, and 48 patients with SCD (11.8%) were positive. Of 7041 (29.7%) were part of the study population, 332 (4.7%) where patients with SCD (hemoglobin [hb] SS/Sbeta0 =252, hbSC n=55, hbS beta thalassemia+ or hbS beta thalassemia undetermined n=21). Among patients without SCD, 36.3% were female, (n=2557) and among patients with SCD, 53.6% (n=178). The mean age of patients without SCD was: 51.1 years (standard deviation [std]) +/- 19.5 years), and for those with SCD: 35.0 years (std +/- 12.0 years). Results of univariate and multivariate analysis are presented in the table. In conclusion, in a Black/African American patients admitted from the Emergency Room for observation and/or the internal medicine service, when adjusted for age, gender and obesity, with SCD are at a significant increased risk for admissions with COVID-19 infection in general as well as ICU admission or admission with respiratory failures. Further studies can help articulate the risk associated with SCD as well as its potential interaction with other factors, with attention to confounders. [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-11-23 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8701606/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2021-148846 Text en Copyright © 2021 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle 114.Hemoglobinopathies, Excluding Thalassemia: Clinical and Epidemiological
Adamkiewicz, Tom
Mubasher, Mohamed
Omole, Folashade
Echols, Melvin R.
Payne, Jason
Leak-Johnson, Tennille
Morgan-Billingslea, Jan
Pines, Kathy
Sundal, Deborah A.
Krebs, Shira
Chang, Eric
Afranie-Sakyi, Jennifer A
Flenaugh, Eric
Volcy, Judith
Garcia, Marlene
Tewolde, Teclemichael
Driss, Adel
Gbinigie, Olusola
Evans, Chad
Harvey, Marques
Alema-Mensah, Ernest
Bryan, Dennis
Majett, Charlye D.
Taylor, Herman Alfred
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) As a Risk for COVI19 Compared to Those without SCD Among Patients Admitted in a Large Urban Center, As Estimated By PCR Sars-v-2 Positive Vs Negative Testing
title Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) As a Risk for COVI19 Compared to Those without SCD Among Patients Admitted in a Large Urban Center, As Estimated By PCR Sars-v-2 Positive Vs Negative Testing
title_full Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) As a Risk for COVI19 Compared to Those without SCD Among Patients Admitted in a Large Urban Center, As Estimated By PCR Sars-v-2 Positive Vs Negative Testing
title_fullStr Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) As a Risk for COVI19 Compared to Those without SCD Among Patients Admitted in a Large Urban Center, As Estimated By PCR Sars-v-2 Positive Vs Negative Testing
title_full_unstemmed Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) As a Risk for COVI19 Compared to Those without SCD Among Patients Admitted in a Large Urban Center, As Estimated By PCR Sars-v-2 Positive Vs Negative Testing
title_short Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) As a Risk for COVI19 Compared to Those without SCD Among Patients Admitted in a Large Urban Center, As Estimated By PCR Sars-v-2 Positive Vs Negative Testing
title_sort sickle cell disease (scd) as a risk for covi19 compared to those without scd among patients admitted in a large urban center, as estimated by pcr sars-v-2 positive vs negative testing
topic 114.Hemoglobinopathies, Excluding Thalassemia: Clinical and Epidemiological
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701606/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2021-148846
work_keys_str_mv AT adamkiewicztom sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT mubashermohamed sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT omolefolashade sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT echolsmelvinr sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT paynejason sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT leakjohnsontennille sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT morganbillingsleajan sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT pineskathy sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT sundaldeboraha sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT krebsshira sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT changeric sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT afraniesakyijennifera sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT flenaugheric sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT volcyjudith sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT garciamarlene sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT tewoldeteclemichael sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT drissadel sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT gbinigieolusola sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT evanschad sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT harveymarques sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT alemamensahernest sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT bryandennis sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT majettcharlyed sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting
AT taylorhermanalfred sicklecelldiseasescdasariskforcovi19comparedtothosewithoutscdamongpatientsadmittedinalargeurbancenterasestimatedbypcrsarsv2positivevsnegativetesting