Cargando…

Audience of Academic Otolaryngology on Twitter: Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Despite the ubiquity of social media, the utilization and audience reach of this communication method by otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) residency programs has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the content posted to a popular social m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Deborah X, Boss, Emily F, Stewart, C Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34889748
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25654
_version_ 1784621068969836544
author Xie, Deborah X
Boss, Emily F
Stewart, C Matthew
author_facet Xie, Deborah X
Boss, Emily F
Stewart, C Matthew
author_sort Xie, Deborah X
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the ubiquity of social media, the utilization and audience reach of this communication method by otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) residency programs has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the content posted to a popular social media platform (Twitter) by OHNS residency programs. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we identified Twitter accounts for accredited academic OHNS residency programs. Tweets published over a 6-month period (March to August 2019) were extracted. Tweets were categorized and analyzed for source (original versus retweet) and target audience (medical versus layman). A random sample of 100 tweets was used to identify patterns of content, which were then used to categorize additional tweets. We quantified the total number of likes or retweets by health care professionals. RESULTS: Of the 121 accredited programs, 35 (28.9%) had Twitter accounts. Of the 2526 tweets in the 6-month period, 1695 (67.10%) were original-content tweets. The majority of tweets (1283/1695, 75.69%) were targeted toward health care workers, most of which did not directly contain medical information (954/1283, 74.36%). These tweets contained information about the department’s trainees and education (349/954, 36.6%), participation at conferences (263/954, 27.6%), and research publications (112/954, 11.7%). Two-thirds of all tweets did not contain medical information. Medical professionals accounted for 1249/1362 (91.70%) of retweets and 5616/6372 (88.14%) of likes on original-content tweets. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Twitter usage by OHNS residency programs is for intra and interprofessional communication, and only a minority of tweets contain information geared toward the public. Communication and information sharing with patients is not the focus of OHNS departments on Twitter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8701711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87017112022-01-10 Audience of Academic Otolaryngology on Twitter: Cross-sectional Study Xie, Deborah X Boss, Emily F Stewart, C Matthew JMIR Med Educ Original Paper BACKGROUND: Despite the ubiquity of social media, the utilization and audience reach of this communication method by otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) residency programs has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the content posted to a popular social media platform (Twitter) by OHNS residency programs. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we identified Twitter accounts for accredited academic OHNS residency programs. Tweets published over a 6-month period (March to August 2019) were extracted. Tweets were categorized and analyzed for source (original versus retweet) and target audience (medical versus layman). A random sample of 100 tweets was used to identify patterns of content, which were then used to categorize additional tweets. We quantified the total number of likes or retweets by health care professionals. RESULTS: Of the 121 accredited programs, 35 (28.9%) had Twitter accounts. Of the 2526 tweets in the 6-month period, 1695 (67.10%) were original-content tweets. The majority of tweets (1283/1695, 75.69%) were targeted toward health care workers, most of which did not directly contain medical information (954/1283, 74.36%). These tweets contained information about the department’s trainees and education (349/954, 36.6%), participation at conferences (263/954, 27.6%), and research publications (112/954, 11.7%). Two-thirds of all tweets did not contain medical information. Medical professionals accounted for 1249/1362 (91.70%) of retweets and 5616/6372 (88.14%) of likes on original-content tweets. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Twitter usage by OHNS residency programs is for intra and interprofessional communication, and only a minority of tweets contain information geared toward the public. Communication and information sharing with patients is not the focus of OHNS departments on Twitter. JMIR Publications 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8701711/ /pubmed/34889748 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25654 Text en ©Deborah X Xie, Emily F Boss, C Matthew Stewart. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 08.12.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Xie, Deborah X
Boss, Emily F
Stewart, C Matthew
Audience of Academic Otolaryngology on Twitter: Cross-sectional Study
title Audience of Academic Otolaryngology on Twitter: Cross-sectional Study
title_full Audience of Academic Otolaryngology on Twitter: Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Audience of Academic Otolaryngology on Twitter: Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Audience of Academic Otolaryngology on Twitter: Cross-sectional Study
title_short Audience of Academic Otolaryngology on Twitter: Cross-sectional Study
title_sort audience of academic otolaryngology on twitter: cross-sectional study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34889748
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25654
work_keys_str_mv AT xiedeborahx audienceofacademicotolaryngologyontwittercrosssectionalstudy
AT bossemilyf audienceofacademicotolaryngologyontwittercrosssectionalstudy
AT stewartcmatthew audienceofacademicotolaryngologyontwittercrosssectionalstudy