Cargando…
COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Introduction: Emerging data suggests that seroresponse (SR) in patients with hematologic malignancy following COVID-19 vaccination is likely lower than in patients without blood cancer. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on SR in patients with hematologi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2021-149652 |
_version_ | 1784621083507294208 |
---|---|
author | Gong, Inna Vijenthira, Abi Betschel, Stephen Hicks, Lisa K. Cheung, Matthew |
author_facet | Gong, Inna Vijenthira, Abi Betschel, Stephen Hicks, Lisa K. Cheung, Matthew |
author_sort | Gong, Inna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Emerging data suggests that seroresponse (SR) in patients with hematologic malignancy following COVID-19 vaccination is likely lower than in patients without blood cancer. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on SR in patients with hematologic malignancy who received COVID-19 vaccination (submitted to PROSPERO for registration). Methods: We searched PubMed and EMBASE from December 1, 2020, to July 22, 2021, to identify studies of SR following COVID-19 vaccine in adult patients with hematologic malignancy (including studies in which patients with hematologic malignancy represented a subset of a broader population). Patients with positive serologic response at baseline (prior to vaccination) or known COVID-19 infection were excluded. The primary outcomes were pooled SR estimates following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with hematologic malignancy, and pooled SR estimates of subgroups based on hematologic malignancy type. Secondary outcomes were pooled relative risk ratio (RR; compared to non-cancer controls) based on dichotomous-effect SR in all patients, and subgroups based on hematologic malignancy type, treatment status, and use of anti-CD20 therapy. Pooled estimates and RR with its associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using MetaXL (EpiGear), and Reference Manager (Cochrane) using random effects model. Results A total of 17 studies comprising 2834 patients with hematologic malignancy from Europe, United Kingdom and North America were included (Figure 1). The pooled estimate for SR was 58% (95% CI 48-67%, I (2) 95%), with a RR of 0.53 (95% 0.42-0.66, I (2) 94%) when compared to controls (10 studies with comparison group, 1092 hematologic malignancy patients, 830 controls; Figure 2). The pooled estimate for SR varied by type of hematologic malignancy: lymphomas SR 52% (95% CI 36-68%, 7 studies, 832 patients, I (2) 94%); chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) SR 42% (95% CI 25-60%, 6 studies, 921 patients, I (2) 93%); plasma cell dyscrasias SR 66% (95% CI 47-83%, 8 studies, 611 patients, I (2) 95%); myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs, including chronic myelogenous leukemia) SR 83% (95% CI 68-95%, 6 studies, 227 patients, I (2) 58%); acute leukemia SR 86% (95% CI 77-94%, 2 studies, 67 patients, 46 acute myelogenous leukemia [AML] and 15 acute lymphocytic leukemia], I (2) 0%). The RR for SR also varied by type of hematologic malignancy: lymphomas (excluding CLL) RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.68, 4 studies, 337 patients, I (2) 89%); CLL RR 0.37 (95% CI 0.25-0.53, 3 studies, 194 patients, I (2) 54%); plasma cell dyscrasias RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.62-0.86, 5 studies, 323 patients, I (2) 70%); RR MPN 0.78 (95% CI 0.62-0.99, 3 studies, 199 patients, I (2) 90%). The pooled estimate for SR in those receiving treatment was 42% (95% CI 26-58%, 9 studies, 683 patients, I (2) 94%). The pooled estimates for SR for those receiving anti-CD20, bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), or venetoclax were 13% (95% CI 1-32%, 6 studies, 367 patients, I (2) 88%), 42% (95% CI 17-71%, 3 studies, 319 patients, I (2) 75%), and 20% (95% CI 0-54%, 3 studies, 39 patients, I (2) 66%), respectively. The RR for those receiving treatment for their hematologic malignancy compared to those who were not receiving treatment was 0.51 (95% CI 0.37-0.71, 8 studies, 579 patients, I (2) 89%; Figure 3). . The RR of patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy compared to non-cancer controls was 0.13 (95% CI 0.02-0.93, 102 patients, I (2) 73%). For patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy, the RR of those receiving vaccination within 9-12 months compared to beyond 9-12 months was 0.12 (95% CI 0.06-0.25, 2 studies, 74 patients, I (2) 0%; Figure 4). Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that patients with hematologic malignancy have a lower SR rate following vaccination compared to controls. Furthermore, SR is variable across different types of hematologic malignancy, with very good response rates seen in patients with myeloid diseases (MPN and AML) and poor response rates seen in lymphoma and CLL. Active treatment, particularly anti-CD20 therapy within 12 months of vaccination, is associated with a particularly low SR following vaccination. Additional studies are needed to understand non-humoral responses to vaccination, and to guide decisions regarding how to optimize vaccine response in patients with blood cancer. We plan to update the systematic review and meta-analysis as more data become available. [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8701771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87017712021-12-28 COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Gong, Inna Vijenthira, Abi Betschel, Stephen Hicks, Lisa K. Cheung, Matthew Blood 905.Outcomes Research-Lymphoid Malignancies Introduction: Emerging data suggests that seroresponse (SR) in patients with hematologic malignancy following COVID-19 vaccination is likely lower than in patients without blood cancer. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on SR in patients with hematologic malignancy who received COVID-19 vaccination (submitted to PROSPERO for registration). Methods: We searched PubMed and EMBASE from December 1, 2020, to July 22, 2021, to identify studies of SR following COVID-19 vaccine in adult patients with hematologic malignancy (including studies in which patients with hematologic malignancy represented a subset of a broader population). Patients with positive serologic response at baseline (prior to vaccination) or known COVID-19 infection were excluded. The primary outcomes were pooled SR estimates following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with hematologic malignancy, and pooled SR estimates of subgroups based on hematologic malignancy type. Secondary outcomes were pooled relative risk ratio (RR; compared to non-cancer controls) based on dichotomous-effect SR in all patients, and subgroups based on hematologic malignancy type, treatment status, and use of anti-CD20 therapy. Pooled estimates and RR with its associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using MetaXL (EpiGear), and Reference Manager (Cochrane) using random effects model. Results A total of 17 studies comprising 2834 patients with hematologic malignancy from Europe, United Kingdom and North America were included (Figure 1). The pooled estimate for SR was 58% (95% CI 48-67%, I (2) 95%), with a RR of 0.53 (95% 0.42-0.66, I (2) 94%) when compared to controls (10 studies with comparison group, 1092 hematologic malignancy patients, 830 controls; Figure 2). The pooled estimate for SR varied by type of hematologic malignancy: lymphomas SR 52% (95% CI 36-68%, 7 studies, 832 patients, I (2) 94%); chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) SR 42% (95% CI 25-60%, 6 studies, 921 patients, I (2) 93%); plasma cell dyscrasias SR 66% (95% CI 47-83%, 8 studies, 611 patients, I (2) 95%); myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs, including chronic myelogenous leukemia) SR 83% (95% CI 68-95%, 6 studies, 227 patients, I (2) 58%); acute leukemia SR 86% (95% CI 77-94%, 2 studies, 67 patients, 46 acute myelogenous leukemia [AML] and 15 acute lymphocytic leukemia], I (2) 0%). The RR for SR also varied by type of hematologic malignancy: lymphomas (excluding CLL) RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.68, 4 studies, 337 patients, I (2) 89%); CLL RR 0.37 (95% CI 0.25-0.53, 3 studies, 194 patients, I (2) 54%); plasma cell dyscrasias RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.62-0.86, 5 studies, 323 patients, I (2) 70%); RR MPN 0.78 (95% CI 0.62-0.99, 3 studies, 199 patients, I (2) 90%). The pooled estimate for SR in those receiving treatment was 42% (95% CI 26-58%, 9 studies, 683 patients, I (2) 94%). The pooled estimates for SR for those receiving anti-CD20, bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), or venetoclax were 13% (95% CI 1-32%, 6 studies, 367 patients, I (2) 88%), 42% (95% CI 17-71%, 3 studies, 319 patients, I (2) 75%), and 20% (95% CI 0-54%, 3 studies, 39 patients, I (2) 66%), respectively. The RR for those receiving treatment for their hematologic malignancy compared to those who were not receiving treatment was 0.51 (95% CI 0.37-0.71, 8 studies, 579 patients, I (2) 89%; Figure 3). . The RR of patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy compared to non-cancer controls was 0.13 (95% CI 0.02-0.93, 102 patients, I (2) 73%). For patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy, the RR of those receiving vaccination within 9-12 months compared to beyond 9-12 months was 0.12 (95% CI 0.06-0.25, 2 studies, 74 patients, I (2) 0%; Figure 4). Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that patients with hematologic malignancy have a lower SR rate following vaccination compared to controls. Furthermore, SR is variable across different types of hematologic malignancy, with very good response rates seen in patients with myeloid diseases (MPN and AML) and poor response rates seen in lymphoma and CLL. Active treatment, particularly anti-CD20 therapy within 12 months of vaccination, is associated with a particularly low SR following vaccination. Additional studies are needed to understand non-humoral responses to vaccination, and to guide decisions regarding how to optimize vaccine response in patients with blood cancer. We plan to update the systematic review and meta-analysis as more data become available. [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-11-23 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8701771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2021-149652 Text en Copyright © 2021 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | 905.Outcomes Research-Lymphoid Malignancies Gong, Inna Vijenthira, Abi Betschel, Stephen Hicks, Lisa K. Cheung, Matthew COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Patients with Hematologic Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | covid-19 vaccine response in patients with hematologic malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 905.Outcomes Research-Lymphoid Malignancies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701771/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2021-149652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gonginna covid19vaccineresponseinpatientswithhematologicmalignancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vijenthiraabi covid19vaccineresponseinpatientswithhematologicmalignancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT betschelstephen covid19vaccineresponseinpatientswithhematologicmalignancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hickslisak covid19vaccineresponseinpatientswithhematologicmalignancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cheungmatthew covid19vaccineresponseinpatientswithhematologicmalignancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |