Cargando…

Interaction Structures in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Adolescents

Despite advances in psychotherapy research showing an evidence-base for psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) in adolescents, developmentally specific treatment characteristics are under-researched. We aimed to identify interaction structures (IS: reciprocal patterns of in-session interactions involving...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Can, Barış, Halfon, Sibel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34948618
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413007
_version_ 1784621096238055424
author Can, Barış
Halfon, Sibel
author_facet Can, Barış
Halfon, Sibel
author_sort Can, Barış
collection PubMed
description Despite advances in psychotherapy research showing an evidence-base for psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) in adolescents, developmentally specific treatment characteristics are under-researched. We aimed to identify interaction structures (IS: reciprocal patterns of in-session interactions involving therapist interventions, patient behaviors, and the therapeutic relationship) and assess associations between IS and outcome. The study cohort comprised 43 adolescents (M(age) = 13.02 years) with nonclinical, internalizing, and comorbid internalizing–externalizing problems in PDT. A total of 123 sessions from different treatment phases were rated based on the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set (APQ). Outcome was assessed with the Brief Problem Monitor-Youth (BPM-Y) administered repeatedly over the treatment course. Principal component analysis of APQ items resulted in five IS, named “Negative Therapeutic Alliance”, “Demanding Patient, Accommodating Therapist”, “Emotionally Distant Resistant Patient”, “Inexpressive Patient, Inviting Therapist”, and “Exploratory Psychodynamic Technique” (EPT). Multilevel modeling analyses with Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimations indicated a two-way interaction effect between EPT and problem levels at baseline such that patients with lower problems at baseline showed good outcome in the context of EPT, whereas an inverse relationship was found for patients with higher problems. Findings provide empirical evidence for characteristic components of PDT for adolescents and preliminary answers about who benefits from psychodynamic techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8701824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87018242021-12-24 Interaction Structures in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Adolescents Can, Barış Halfon, Sibel Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Despite advances in psychotherapy research showing an evidence-base for psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) in adolescents, developmentally specific treatment characteristics are under-researched. We aimed to identify interaction structures (IS: reciprocal patterns of in-session interactions involving therapist interventions, patient behaviors, and the therapeutic relationship) and assess associations between IS and outcome. The study cohort comprised 43 adolescents (M(age) = 13.02 years) with nonclinical, internalizing, and comorbid internalizing–externalizing problems in PDT. A total of 123 sessions from different treatment phases were rated based on the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set (APQ). Outcome was assessed with the Brief Problem Monitor-Youth (BPM-Y) administered repeatedly over the treatment course. Principal component analysis of APQ items resulted in five IS, named “Negative Therapeutic Alliance”, “Demanding Patient, Accommodating Therapist”, “Emotionally Distant Resistant Patient”, “Inexpressive Patient, Inviting Therapist”, and “Exploratory Psychodynamic Technique” (EPT). Multilevel modeling analyses with Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimations indicated a two-way interaction effect between EPT and problem levels at baseline such that patients with lower problems at baseline showed good outcome in the context of EPT, whereas an inverse relationship was found for patients with higher problems. Findings provide empirical evidence for characteristic components of PDT for adolescents and preliminary answers about who benefits from psychodynamic techniques. MDPI 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8701824/ /pubmed/34948618 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413007 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Can, Barış
Halfon, Sibel
Interaction Structures in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Adolescents
title Interaction Structures in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Adolescents
title_full Interaction Structures in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Adolescents
title_fullStr Interaction Structures in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Interaction Structures in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Adolescents
title_short Interaction Structures in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Adolescents
title_sort interaction structures in psychodynamic psychotherapy for adolescents
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34948618
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413007
work_keys_str_mv AT canbarıs interactionstructuresinpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforadolescents
AT halfonsibel interactionstructuresinpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforadolescents