Cargando…

Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review

Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to the ability to perceive, express, understand, and manage emotions. Current research indicates that it may protect against the emotional burden experienced in certain professions. This article aims to provide an updated systematic review of existing instruments t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bru-Luna, Lluna María, Martí-Vilar, Manuel, Merino-Soto, César, Cervera-Santiago, José L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946422
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121696
_version_ 1784621112489934848
author Bru-Luna, Lluna María
Martí-Vilar, Manuel
Merino-Soto, César
Cervera-Santiago, José L.
author_facet Bru-Luna, Lluna María
Martí-Vilar, Manuel
Merino-Soto, César
Cervera-Santiago, José L.
author_sort Bru-Luna, Lluna María
collection PubMed
description Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to the ability to perceive, express, understand, and manage emotions. Current research indicates that it may protect against the emotional burden experienced in certain professions. This article aims to provide an updated systematic review of existing instruments to assess EI in professionals, focusing on the description of their characteristics as well as their psychometric properties (reliability and validity). A literature search was conducted in Web of Science (WoS). A total of 2761 items met the eligibility criteria, from which a total of 40 different instruments were extracted and analysed. Most were based on three main models (i.e., skill-based, trait-based, and mixed), which differ in the way they conceptualize and measure EI. All have been shown to have advantages and disadvantages inherent to the type of tool. The instruments reported in the largest number of studies are Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i), Schutte Self Report-Inventory (SSRI), Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test 2.0 (MSCEIT 2.0), Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS), Wong and Law’s Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), and Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). The main measure of the estimated reliability has been internal consistency, and the construction of EI measures was predominantly based on linear modelling or classical test theory. The study has limitations: we only searched a single database, the impossibility of estimating inter-rater reliability, and non-compliance with some items required by PRISMA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8701889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87018892021-12-24 Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review Bru-Luna, Lluna María Martí-Vilar, Manuel Merino-Soto, César Cervera-Santiago, José L. Healthcare (Basel) Systematic Review Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to the ability to perceive, express, understand, and manage emotions. Current research indicates that it may protect against the emotional burden experienced in certain professions. This article aims to provide an updated systematic review of existing instruments to assess EI in professionals, focusing on the description of their characteristics as well as their psychometric properties (reliability and validity). A literature search was conducted in Web of Science (WoS). A total of 2761 items met the eligibility criteria, from which a total of 40 different instruments were extracted and analysed. Most were based on three main models (i.e., skill-based, trait-based, and mixed), which differ in the way they conceptualize and measure EI. All have been shown to have advantages and disadvantages inherent to the type of tool. The instruments reported in the largest number of studies are Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i), Schutte Self Report-Inventory (SSRI), Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test 2.0 (MSCEIT 2.0), Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS), Wong and Law’s Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), and Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). The main measure of the estimated reliability has been internal consistency, and the construction of EI measures was predominantly based on linear modelling or classical test theory. The study has limitations: we only searched a single database, the impossibility of estimating inter-rater reliability, and non-compliance with some items required by PRISMA. MDPI 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8701889/ /pubmed/34946422 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121696 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Bru-Luna, Lluna María
Martí-Vilar, Manuel
Merino-Soto, César
Cervera-Santiago, José L.
Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review
title Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review
title_full Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review
title_short Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review
title_sort emotional intelligence measures: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946422
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121696
work_keys_str_mv AT brulunallunamaria emotionalintelligencemeasuresasystematicreview
AT martivilarmanuel emotionalintelligencemeasuresasystematicreview
AT merinosotocesar emotionalintelligencemeasuresasystematicreview
AT cerverasantiagojosel emotionalintelligencemeasuresasystematicreview