Cargando…
Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review
Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to the ability to perceive, express, understand, and manage emotions. Current research indicates that it may protect against the emotional burden experienced in certain professions. This article aims to provide an updated systematic review of existing instruments t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946422 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121696 |
_version_ | 1784621112489934848 |
---|---|
author | Bru-Luna, Lluna María Martí-Vilar, Manuel Merino-Soto, César Cervera-Santiago, José L. |
author_facet | Bru-Luna, Lluna María Martí-Vilar, Manuel Merino-Soto, César Cervera-Santiago, José L. |
author_sort | Bru-Luna, Lluna María |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to the ability to perceive, express, understand, and manage emotions. Current research indicates that it may protect against the emotional burden experienced in certain professions. This article aims to provide an updated systematic review of existing instruments to assess EI in professionals, focusing on the description of their characteristics as well as their psychometric properties (reliability and validity). A literature search was conducted in Web of Science (WoS). A total of 2761 items met the eligibility criteria, from which a total of 40 different instruments were extracted and analysed. Most were based on three main models (i.e., skill-based, trait-based, and mixed), which differ in the way they conceptualize and measure EI. All have been shown to have advantages and disadvantages inherent to the type of tool. The instruments reported in the largest number of studies are Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i), Schutte Self Report-Inventory (SSRI), Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test 2.0 (MSCEIT 2.0), Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS), Wong and Law’s Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), and Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). The main measure of the estimated reliability has been internal consistency, and the construction of EI measures was predominantly based on linear modelling or classical test theory. The study has limitations: we only searched a single database, the impossibility of estimating inter-rater reliability, and non-compliance with some items required by PRISMA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8701889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87018892021-12-24 Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review Bru-Luna, Lluna María Martí-Vilar, Manuel Merino-Soto, César Cervera-Santiago, José L. Healthcare (Basel) Systematic Review Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to the ability to perceive, express, understand, and manage emotions. Current research indicates that it may protect against the emotional burden experienced in certain professions. This article aims to provide an updated systematic review of existing instruments to assess EI in professionals, focusing on the description of their characteristics as well as their psychometric properties (reliability and validity). A literature search was conducted in Web of Science (WoS). A total of 2761 items met the eligibility criteria, from which a total of 40 different instruments were extracted and analysed. Most were based on three main models (i.e., skill-based, trait-based, and mixed), which differ in the way they conceptualize and measure EI. All have been shown to have advantages and disadvantages inherent to the type of tool. The instruments reported in the largest number of studies are Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i), Schutte Self Report-Inventory (SSRI), Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test 2.0 (MSCEIT 2.0), Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS), Wong and Law’s Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), and Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue). The main measure of the estimated reliability has been internal consistency, and the construction of EI measures was predominantly based on linear modelling or classical test theory. The study has limitations: we only searched a single database, the impossibility of estimating inter-rater reliability, and non-compliance with some items required by PRISMA. MDPI 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8701889/ /pubmed/34946422 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121696 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Bru-Luna, Lluna María Martí-Vilar, Manuel Merino-Soto, César Cervera-Santiago, José L. Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review |
title | Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Emotional Intelligence Measures: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | emotional intelligence measures: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946422 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brulunallunamaria emotionalintelligencemeasuresasystematicreview AT martivilarmanuel emotionalintelligencemeasuresasystematicreview AT merinosotocesar emotionalintelligencemeasuresasystematicreview AT cerverasantiagojosel emotionalintelligencemeasuresasystematicreview |