Cargando…
Pre-operative angle of trunk rotation in prone position estimates postoperative correction results
This study investigated whether postoperative rotational deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients could be predicted by prone-position pre-operative angle of trunk rotation (ATR). Surgical rib hump correction is performed with the patient in a prone position. However, the association be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34941198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028445 |
Sumario: | This study investigated whether postoperative rotational deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients could be predicted by prone-position pre-operative angle of trunk rotation (ATR). Surgical rib hump correction is performed with the patient in a prone position. However, the association between pre-operative ATR in the prone position and postoperative ATR results is unknown. Thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent skip pedicle screw fixation for Lenke type 1 or 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were retrospectively reviewed. All subjects were followed for a minimum of 1 year. ATR measurements were taken for the standing-flexion position with a scoliometer before surgery and at 1 year afterward. Pre-operative measurements were also taken for the prone position. Correlations between pre- and postoperative ATR were calculated by means of Pearson correlation coefficient. Associations between the correction angle from the standing-flexion position to prone position and postoperative standing-flexion correction angle were determined by linear regression analysis. Pre- and postoperative ATR for the standing-flexion position showed a moderate association (r = 0.64, P < .01). A similar correlation was seen for pre-operative prone-position ATR and postoperative standing-flexion ATR (r = 0.56, P < .01). In linear regression analysis, there was significant proportional error between the correction angle from the standing-flexion position to prone position and postoperative standing-flexion correction angle (β = 0.40, P < .01). In conclusion, pre-operative ATR in either standing-flexion or prone position and postoperative standing-flexion ATR displayed moderate associations. Linear regression analysis revealed that ATR correction angle could be estimated by calculating the correction gains of 0.4° per 1° of correction angle in the prone position. |
---|