Cargando…

Why Are the Proportions of In-Vitro Fertilisation Interventions for Same Sex Female Couples Increasing?

Same-sex female couples who wish to become pregnant can choose donor insemination or in-vitro fertilization (IVF)—a technique intended for infertile women. In general, women in same-sex female partnerships are no more likely to be infertile than those in opposite sex partnerships. This article inves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meads, Catherine, Thorogood, Laura-Rose, Lindemann, Katy, Bewley, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946383
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121657
_version_ 1784621178180075520
author Meads, Catherine
Thorogood, Laura-Rose
Lindemann, Katy
Bewley, Susan
author_facet Meads, Catherine
Thorogood, Laura-Rose
Lindemann, Katy
Bewley, Susan
author_sort Meads, Catherine
collection PubMed
description Same-sex female couples who wish to become pregnant can choose donor insemination or in-vitro fertilization (IVF)—a technique intended for infertile women. In general, women in same-sex female partnerships are no more likely to be infertile than those in opposite sex partnerships. This article investigates data available from the Government Regulator of UK fertility clinics—the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority, which is the only data available worldwide on same-sex female couples and their fertility choices. IVF is increasing both in absolute numbers and relative proportions year on year in the UK, compared to licensed donor insemination for same-sex female couples. As IVF has greater human and financial costs than donor insemination, policies should not encourage it as the first choice for fertile women requiring sperm. Commercial transactions are taking place where fertile lesbians receive cut price, and arguably unnecessary, IVF intervention in exchange for selling their eggs to be used for other infertile customers. If women are not told about the efficacy of fresh vs. frozen semen, and the risks of egg ‘sharing’ or intra-couple donation, exploitation becomes possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8702152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87021522021-12-24 Why Are the Proportions of In-Vitro Fertilisation Interventions for Same Sex Female Couples Increasing? Meads, Catherine Thorogood, Laura-Rose Lindemann, Katy Bewley, Susan Healthcare (Basel) Article Same-sex female couples who wish to become pregnant can choose donor insemination or in-vitro fertilization (IVF)—a technique intended for infertile women. In general, women in same-sex female partnerships are no more likely to be infertile than those in opposite sex partnerships. This article investigates data available from the Government Regulator of UK fertility clinics—the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority, which is the only data available worldwide on same-sex female couples and their fertility choices. IVF is increasing both in absolute numbers and relative proportions year on year in the UK, compared to licensed donor insemination for same-sex female couples. As IVF has greater human and financial costs than donor insemination, policies should not encourage it as the first choice for fertile women requiring sperm. Commercial transactions are taking place where fertile lesbians receive cut price, and arguably unnecessary, IVF intervention in exchange for selling their eggs to be used for other infertile customers. If women are not told about the efficacy of fresh vs. frozen semen, and the risks of egg ‘sharing’ or intra-couple donation, exploitation becomes possible. MDPI 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8702152/ /pubmed/34946383 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121657 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Meads, Catherine
Thorogood, Laura-Rose
Lindemann, Katy
Bewley, Susan
Why Are the Proportions of In-Vitro Fertilisation Interventions for Same Sex Female Couples Increasing?
title Why Are the Proportions of In-Vitro Fertilisation Interventions for Same Sex Female Couples Increasing?
title_full Why Are the Proportions of In-Vitro Fertilisation Interventions for Same Sex Female Couples Increasing?
title_fullStr Why Are the Proportions of In-Vitro Fertilisation Interventions for Same Sex Female Couples Increasing?
title_full_unstemmed Why Are the Proportions of In-Vitro Fertilisation Interventions for Same Sex Female Couples Increasing?
title_short Why Are the Proportions of In-Vitro Fertilisation Interventions for Same Sex Female Couples Increasing?
title_sort why are the proportions of in-vitro fertilisation interventions for same sex female couples increasing?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946383
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121657
work_keys_str_mv AT meadscatherine whyaretheproportionsofinvitrofertilisationinterventionsforsamesexfemalecouplesincreasing
AT thorogoodlaurarose whyaretheproportionsofinvitrofertilisationinterventionsforsamesexfemalecouplesincreasing
AT lindemannkaty whyaretheproportionsofinvitrofertilisationinterventionsforsamesexfemalecouplesincreasing
AT bewleysusan whyaretheproportionsofinvitrofertilisationinterventionsforsamesexfemalecouplesincreasing