Cargando…
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Monitoring Methods and Live Trapping in Mammals
The conservation and management of wildlife requires the accurate assessment of wildlife population sizes. However, there is a lack of synthesis of research that compares methods used to estimate population size in the wild. Using a meta-analysis approach, we compared the number of detected individu...
Autores principales: | Miranda Paez, Andrea, Sundaram, Mekala, Willoughby, Janna R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34946898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12121949 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Remotely sensed environmental measurements detect decoupled processes driving population dynamics at contrasting scales
por: Harder, Avril M., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Optimising Camera Traps for Monitoring Small Mammals
por: Glen, Alistair S., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Segregating the Effects of Seed Traits and Common Ancestry of Hardwood Trees on Eastern Gray Squirrel Foraging Decisions
por: Sundaram, Mekala, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Habitat and Season Effects on Small Mammal Bycatch in Live Trapping
por: Hotopp, Ines, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Management of avian malaria in populations of high conservation concern
por: Miranda Paez, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2022)