Cargando…

Non-contrast mDixon MR angiography of the neck: Comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography in normal subjects

We investigated the feasibility of non-contrast three-dimensional modified Dixon (mDixon) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate the carotid artery. We studied 30 normal patients who underwent non-contrast mDixon and conventional time-of-flight (TOF) MRA of the neck with a clinical 3T MR s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mizoshiri, Tomohiro, Yoshida, Morikatsu, Oda, Seitaro, Tsumagari, Shota, Nakaura, Takeshi, Harada, Kazunori, Ikeda, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34941146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028351
Descripción
Sumario:We investigated the feasibility of non-contrast three-dimensional modified Dixon (mDixon) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate the carotid artery. We studied 30 normal patients who underwent non-contrast mDixon and conventional time-of-flight (TOF) MRA of the neck with a clinical 3T MR scanner. Carotid artery signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared between mDixon-MRA and TOF-MRA. Two readers independently evaluated vessel sharpness, image contrast, and overall image quality using a 4-point scale. SNR was significantly higher on mDixon-MRA than TOF-MRA (P < .01). There was no significant difference in contrast-to-noise ratio. The visual score for vessel sharpness was significantly higher on mDixon-MRA than TOF-MRA (P < .01), whereas the score for contrast was significantly higher on TOF-MRA (P < .01). Although non-contrast three-dimensional mDixon-MRA showed lower visual contrast than conventional TOF-MRA, it provided images with significantly higher SNR and better vessel sharpness than TOF-MRA.