Cargando…
Growth trends analysis of unilateral condylar hyperplasia followed up with planar scintigraphy: Retrospective overview of 249 cases
The current research aimed to retrospectively investigate the trends of the growth of condylar hyperplasia with serial planar scintigraphs. Patients of unilateral condylar hyperplasia with at least one follow-up planar scintigraph were retrospectively included in the study. Patients’ age, gender at...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34941087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028226 |
Sumario: | The current research aimed to retrospectively investigate the trends of the growth of condylar hyperplasia with serial planar scintigraphs. Patients of unilateral condylar hyperplasia with at least one follow-up planar scintigraph were retrospectively included in the study. Patients’ age, gender at the initial scan, durations of following scans, and ratios between condylar activities were recorded. The study retrospectively included 111 patients of unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Patients were divided into 3 groups (progressive, relatively stable, regressive) according to ratio variation between initial and last scans. There were 23 (21%) patients fell into the progressive group, 40 (36%) patients into the relatively stable group, and 48 (43%) patients into the regressive group. More female patients were in the progressive group than those in the other groups (P < .01). There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in terms of age or durations of follow-up (P > .05). There were no strong relations between ratio differences and ages. However, a weak relation seems to exist in the regressive group with r = −0.240, (P = .10). Our investigation showed that more than a half of patients with condylar hyperplasia remain constantly or progressively active growth in patients in the follow-up scans. Roughly less than a half of patients showed regressive trends toward normal growth. Patients’ age seemly does not play a role in the growth trend pattern, although there are no optimum follow-up periods, regularly follow-up scans are needed to determine the growth status of condylar hyperplasia. |
---|