Cargando…

Enhanced Drainage Protocol in Large Amoebic Liver Abscess

Background  Amebic liver abscess (ALA) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in patients of the developing world. Even though medical management is the primary modality of treatment, 15% of the cases are refractory and require intervention for drainage. Pigtail catheterization is inef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gandhi, Jignesh A., Shinde, Pravin H., Chaudhari, Sadashiv N., Banker, Amay M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740625
_version_ 1784621232709173248
author Gandhi, Jignesh A.
Shinde, Pravin H.
Chaudhari, Sadashiv N.
Banker, Amay M.
author_facet Gandhi, Jignesh A.
Shinde, Pravin H.
Chaudhari, Sadashiv N.
Banker, Amay M.
author_sort Gandhi, Jignesh A.
collection PubMed
description Background  Amebic liver abscess (ALA) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in patients of the developing world. Even though medical management is the primary modality of treatment, 15% of the cases are refractory and require intervention for drainage. Pigtail catheterization is inefficient and results in a long duration of hospital stay. So, we conducted a prospective observational study to determine the efficacy and safety of drainage of large ALA using a wide bore 24 French (Fr) drain compared with a conventionally used 10 Fr pigtail catheter. Materials and Methods  A single center prospective observational study was conducted over a period of 5 years and data of 122 patients was collected. After starting empirical medical therapy, patients underwent drainage of ALA with either a 10 French pigtail or a 24 Fr drain. The primary outcome variables were resolution of clinical symptoms such as fever and pain in abdomen, length of hospital stay, and resolution of abscess on imaging at day 3. Secondary outcome was complications related to the procedures. Results  Data of 122 patients was collected. Males constituted a vast majority (96%) of the study population and the fifth decade was the most common age group involved. Alcoholics had a higher chance of developing a large ALA. Sixty-eight patients underwent drainage of the ALA using a 24 Fr drain which resulted in faster resolution of symptoms (2.4 vs. 5.1 days, p -value 0.033), a shorter duration of catheter in situ (6.4 vs. 13.2, p -value 0.011), and a faster drainage of ALA (residual volume at day 3; 177 vs. 212 mL, p -value 0.021). Twenty-eight patients had a biliary communication of which 26 required therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Conclusion  In patients with a large ALA, placement of a wide bore 24 Fr catheter hastens recovery of the patients when compared with drainage with a standard 10 Fr pigtail catheter. Placement of a biliary stent serves as a useful adjunct for their management and it may obliviate the need for a major biliary diversion surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8702372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87023722021-12-28 Enhanced Drainage Protocol in Large Amoebic Liver Abscess Gandhi, Jignesh A. Shinde, Pravin H. Chaudhari, Sadashiv N. Banker, Amay M. Surg J (N Y) Background  Amebic liver abscess (ALA) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in patients of the developing world. Even though medical management is the primary modality of treatment, 15% of the cases are refractory and require intervention for drainage. Pigtail catheterization is inefficient and results in a long duration of hospital stay. So, we conducted a prospective observational study to determine the efficacy and safety of drainage of large ALA using a wide bore 24 French (Fr) drain compared with a conventionally used 10 Fr pigtail catheter. Materials and Methods  A single center prospective observational study was conducted over a period of 5 years and data of 122 patients was collected. After starting empirical medical therapy, patients underwent drainage of ALA with either a 10 French pigtail or a 24 Fr drain. The primary outcome variables were resolution of clinical symptoms such as fever and pain in abdomen, length of hospital stay, and resolution of abscess on imaging at day 3. Secondary outcome was complications related to the procedures. Results  Data of 122 patients was collected. Males constituted a vast majority (96%) of the study population and the fifth decade was the most common age group involved. Alcoholics had a higher chance of developing a large ALA. Sixty-eight patients underwent drainage of the ALA using a 24 Fr drain which resulted in faster resolution of symptoms (2.4 vs. 5.1 days, p -value 0.033), a shorter duration of catheter in situ (6.4 vs. 13.2, p -value 0.011), and a faster drainage of ALA (residual volume at day 3; 177 vs. 212 mL, p -value 0.021). Twenty-eight patients had a biliary communication of which 26 required therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Conclusion  In patients with a large ALA, placement of a wide bore 24 Fr catheter hastens recovery of the patients when compared with drainage with a standard 10 Fr pigtail catheter. Placement of a biliary stent serves as a useful adjunct for their management and it may obliviate the need for a major biliary diversion surgery. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8702372/ /pubmed/34966848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740625 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Gandhi, Jignesh A.
Shinde, Pravin H.
Chaudhari, Sadashiv N.
Banker, Amay M.
Enhanced Drainage Protocol in Large Amoebic Liver Abscess
title Enhanced Drainage Protocol in Large Amoebic Liver Abscess
title_full Enhanced Drainage Protocol in Large Amoebic Liver Abscess
title_fullStr Enhanced Drainage Protocol in Large Amoebic Liver Abscess
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced Drainage Protocol in Large Amoebic Liver Abscess
title_short Enhanced Drainage Protocol in Large Amoebic Liver Abscess
title_sort enhanced drainage protocol in large amoebic liver abscess
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740625
work_keys_str_mv AT gandhijignesha enhanceddrainageprotocolinlargeamoebicliverabscess
AT shindepravinh enhanceddrainageprotocolinlargeamoebicliverabscess
AT chaudharisadashivn enhanceddrainageprotocolinlargeamoebicliverabscess
AT bankeramaym enhanceddrainageprotocolinlargeamoebicliverabscess