Cargando…

The Role of Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography Scan in Hallux Valgus

CATEGORY: Midfoot/Forefoot; Bunion INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Hyperpronation of the 1st metatarsal in hallux valgus (HV) is poorly understood by conventional weightbearing radiography. We aimed to evaluate this parameter using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and understand its association with o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metikala, Sreenivasulu, Khamis, Karim Mahmoud, Fryhofer, George W., Mehta, Samir, Farber, Daniel C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702746/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00355
_version_ 1784621310226202624
author Metikala, Sreenivasulu
Khamis, Karim Mahmoud
Fryhofer, George W.
Mehta, Samir
Farber, Daniel C.
author_facet Metikala, Sreenivasulu
Khamis, Karim Mahmoud
Fryhofer, George W.
Mehta, Samir
Farber, Daniel C.
author_sort Metikala, Sreenivasulu
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Midfoot/Forefoot; Bunion INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Hyperpronation of the 1st metatarsal in hallux valgus (HV) is poorly understood by conventional weightbearing radiography. We aimed to evaluate this parameter using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and understand its association with other standard measurements. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of WBCT and weightbearing radiographs (WBXR) was performed for 20 patients with hallux valgus (HV) feet and 20 controls with no such deformity. Axial CT images of both groups were compared for 1st metatarsal pronation angle (α angle) and tibial sesamoid subluxation (TSS) grades. The hallux valgus angle (HVA), first-second intermetatarsal angle (IMA), 1st metatarsal-medial cuneiform angle (MMCA), Meary’s angle, and calcaneal pitch (CP) angle of the study and control groups were compared on both WBXR and the corresponding 2D images of WBCT. All the measurements were independently studied by a dedicated musculoskeletal radiology fellow. RESULTS: HV group demonstrated significantly higher values for TSS grade (p < 0.001) but not for α angle (p = 0.19) compared to controls. Pearson’s correlations of the α angle, in the HV group, revealed no significant linear relationship with TSS grades, IMA and MMCA, and only a moderate positive correlation with HVA as per WBXR (r = 0.38, p = 0.014) but not by WBCT (p = 0.084). Also, α angle performed within the range of a chance (AUC 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.66) when measured by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. CONCLUSION: The α angle - a measure of abnormal hyperpronation of the 1st metatarsal - is an independent factor that may co- exist with other parameters in HV, but in isolation has limited diagnostic utility. ‘Abnormal’ α angles may even be observed in individuals without HV deformity. An increase in the HVA, IMA, MMCA or TSS grade is not necessarily associated with a similar increase in the α angle and hence, the severity of HV deformity may not be judged on this parameter alone. The WBCT is a reliable method to assess hyperpronation and guide physicians during surgical management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8702746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87027462022-01-28 The Role of Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography Scan in Hallux Valgus Metikala, Sreenivasulu Khamis, Karim Mahmoud Fryhofer, George W. Mehta, Samir Farber, Daniel C. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Midfoot/Forefoot; Bunion INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Hyperpronation of the 1st metatarsal in hallux valgus (HV) is poorly understood by conventional weightbearing radiography. We aimed to evaluate this parameter using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and understand its association with other standard measurements. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of WBCT and weightbearing radiographs (WBXR) was performed for 20 patients with hallux valgus (HV) feet and 20 controls with no such deformity. Axial CT images of both groups were compared for 1st metatarsal pronation angle (α angle) and tibial sesamoid subluxation (TSS) grades. The hallux valgus angle (HVA), first-second intermetatarsal angle (IMA), 1st metatarsal-medial cuneiform angle (MMCA), Meary’s angle, and calcaneal pitch (CP) angle of the study and control groups were compared on both WBXR and the corresponding 2D images of WBCT. All the measurements were independently studied by a dedicated musculoskeletal radiology fellow. RESULTS: HV group demonstrated significantly higher values for TSS grade (p < 0.001) but not for α angle (p = 0.19) compared to controls. Pearson’s correlations of the α angle, in the HV group, revealed no significant linear relationship with TSS grades, IMA and MMCA, and only a moderate positive correlation with HVA as per WBXR (r = 0.38, p = 0.014) but not by WBCT (p = 0.084). Also, α angle performed within the range of a chance (AUC 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.66) when measured by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. CONCLUSION: The α angle - a measure of abnormal hyperpronation of the 1st metatarsal - is an independent factor that may co- exist with other parameters in HV, but in isolation has limited diagnostic utility. ‘Abnormal’ α angles may even be observed in individuals without HV deformity. An increase in the HVA, IMA, MMCA or TSS grade is not necessarily associated with a similar increase in the α angle and hence, the severity of HV deformity may not be judged on this parameter alone. The WBCT is a reliable method to assess hyperpronation and guide physicians during surgical management. SAGE Publications 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8702746/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00355 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Metikala, Sreenivasulu
Khamis, Karim Mahmoud
Fryhofer, George W.
Mehta, Samir
Farber, Daniel C.
The Role of Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography Scan in Hallux Valgus
title The Role of Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography Scan in Hallux Valgus
title_full The Role of Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography Scan in Hallux Valgus
title_fullStr The Role of Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography Scan in Hallux Valgus
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography Scan in Hallux Valgus
title_short The Role of Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography Scan in Hallux Valgus
title_sort role of weight-bearing computed tomography scan in hallux valgus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702746/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00355
work_keys_str_mv AT metikalasreenivasulu theroleofweightbearingcomputedtomographyscaninhalluxvalgus
AT khamiskarimmahmoud theroleofweightbearingcomputedtomographyscaninhalluxvalgus
AT fryhofergeorgew theroleofweightbearingcomputedtomographyscaninhalluxvalgus
AT mehtasamir theroleofweightbearingcomputedtomographyscaninhalluxvalgus
AT farberdanielc theroleofweightbearingcomputedtomographyscaninhalluxvalgus
AT metikalasreenivasulu roleofweightbearingcomputedtomographyscaninhalluxvalgus
AT khamiskarimmahmoud roleofweightbearingcomputedtomographyscaninhalluxvalgus
AT fryhofergeorgew roleofweightbearingcomputedtomographyscaninhalluxvalgus
AT mehtasamir roleofweightbearingcomputedtomographyscaninhalluxvalgus
AT farberdanielc roleofweightbearingcomputedtomographyscaninhalluxvalgus