Cargando…
Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study
BACKGROUND: To evaluate seroma complications, two techniques were carried out in breast reconstruction: conventional latissimus dorsi flap (CLD) and muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap (MSLD) after cancer-related mastectomy. METHODS: A total of 108 postmastectomy procedures were performed with auto...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2021.11.001 |
_version_ | 1784621331920191488 |
---|---|
author | Restrepo, Victor R. Ortiz, Santiago Echeverri, Daniel Guerra, Kennedy A. Gómez, Daniel |
author_facet | Restrepo, Victor R. Ortiz, Santiago Echeverri, Daniel Guerra, Kennedy A. Gómez, Daniel |
author_sort | Restrepo, Victor R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate seroma complications, two techniques were carried out in breast reconstruction: conventional latissimus dorsi flap (CLD) and muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap (MSLD) after cancer-related mastectomy. METHODS: A total of 108 postmastectomy procedures were performed with autologous tissue reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps (LDs) between January 2016 and May 2020. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group was reconstruction with the CLD, and the second group was reconstruction with the MSLD. Forty (40) patients in the first group and 68 patients in the second group were analyzed. Seroma formation was evaluated as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The total number of seromas found in the donor area was 27, of which 45% (n = 18) were found with the CLD and 13.24% (n = 9) with the MSLD, with a difference of 31.76% in favor of the MSLD, with an 95% CI of 14–49 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significantly lower incidence of seroma as a complication in patients who underwent MSLD breast reconstruction compared with those who underwent CLD breast reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8702845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87028452022-01-04 Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study Restrepo, Victor R. Ortiz, Santiago Echeverri, Daniel Guerra, Kennedy A. Gómez, Daniel JPRAS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate seroma complications, two techniques were carried out in breast reconstruction: conventional latissimus dorsi flap (CLD) and muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap (MSLD) after cancer-related mastectomy. METHODS: A total of 108 postmastectomy procedures were performed with autologous tissue reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps (LDs) between January 2016 and May 2020. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group was reconstruction with the CLD, and the second group was reconstruction with the MSLD. Forty (40) patients in the first group and 68 patients in the second group were analyzed. Seroma formation was evaluated as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The total number of seromas found in the donor area was 27, of which 45% (n = 18) were found with the CLD and 13.24% (n = 9) with the MSLD, with a difference of 31.76% in favor of the MSLD, with an 95% CI of 14–49 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significantly lower incidence of seroma as a complication in patients who underwent MSLD breast reconstruction compared with those who underwent CLD breast reconstruction. Elsevier 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8702845/ /pubmed/34988276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2021.11.001 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Restrepo, Victor R. Ortiz, Santiago Echeverri, Daniel Guerra, Kennedy A. Gómez, Daniel Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study |
title | Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study |
title_full | Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study |
title_short | Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study |
title_sort | evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a retrospective observational study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2021.11.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT restrepovictorr evaluationofseromasinpostmastectomybreastreconstructionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT ortizsantiago evaluationofseromasinpostmastectomybreastreconstructionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT echeverridaniel evaluationofseromasinpostmastectomybreastreconstructionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT guerrakennedya evaluationofseromasinpostmastectomybreastreconstructionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT gomezdaniel evaluationofseromasinpostmastectomybreastreconstructionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy |