Cargando…

Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: To evaluate seroma complications, two techniques were carried out in breast reconstruction: conventional latissimus dorsi flap (CLD) and muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap (MSLD) after cancer-related mastectomy. METHODS: A total of 108 postmastectomy procedures were performed with auto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Restrepo, Victor R., Ortiz, Santiago, Echeverri, Daniel, Guerra, Kennedy A., Gómez, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2021.11.001
_version_ 1784621331920191488
author Restrepo, Victor R.
Ortiz, Santiago
Echeverri, Daniel
Guerra, Kennedy A.
Gómez, Daniel
author_facet Restrepo, Victor R.
Ortiz, Santiago
Echeverri, Daniel
Guerra, Kennedy A.
Gómez, Daniel
author_sort Restrepo, Victor R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate seroma complications, two techniques were carried out in breast reconstruction: conventional latissimus dorsi flap (CLD) and muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap (MSLD) after cancer-related mastectomy. METHODS: A total of 108 postmastectomy procedures were performed with autologous tissue reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps (LDs) between January 2016 and May 2020. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group was reconstruction with the CLD, and the second group was reconstruction with the MSLD. Forty (40) patients in the first group and 68 patients in the second group were analyzed. Seroma formation was evaluated as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The total number of seromas found in the donor area was 27, of which 45% (n = 18) were found with the CLD and 13.24% (n = 9) with the MSLD, with a difference of 31.76% in favor of the MSLD, with an 95% CI of 14–49 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significantly lower incidence of seroma as a complication in patients who underwent MSLD breast reconstruction compared with those who underwent CLD breast reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8702845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87028452022-01-04 Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study Restrepo, Victor R. Ortiz, Santiago Echeverri, Daniel Guerra, Kennedy A. Gómez, Daniel JPRAS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate seroma complications, two techniques were carried out in breast reconstruction: conventional latissimus dorsi flap (CLD) and muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap (MSLD) after cancer-related mastectomy. METHODS: A total of 108 postmastectomy procedures were performed with autologous tissue reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flaps (LDs) between January 2016 and May 2020. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group was reconstruction with the CLD, and the second group was reconstruction with the MSLD. Forty (40) patients in the first group and 68 patients in the second group were analyzed. Seroma formation was evaluated as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The total number of seromas found in the donor area was 27, of which 45% (n = 18) were found with the CLD and 13.24% (n = 9) with the MSLD, with a difference of 31.76% in favor of the MSLD, with an 95% CI of 14–49 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significantly lower incidence of seroma as a complication in patients who underwent MSLD breast reconstruction compared with those who underwent CLD breast reconstruction. Elsevier 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8702845/ /pubmed/34988276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2021.11.001 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Restrepo, Victor R.
Ortiz, Santiago
Echeverri, Daniel
Guerra, Kennedy A.
Gómez, Daniel
Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study
title Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study
title_full Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study
title_short Evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective observational study
title_sort evaluation of seromas in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a retrospective observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2021.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT restrepovictorr evaluationofseromasinpostmastectomybreastreconstructionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ortizsantiago evaluationofseromasinpostmastectomybreastreconstructionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT echeverridaniel evaluationofseromasinpostmastectomybreastreconstructionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT guerrakennedya evaluationofseromasinpostmastectomybreastreconstructionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT gomezdaniel evaluationofseromasinpostmastectomybreastreconstructionaretrospectiveobservationalstudy