Cargando…

No Progression of Radiological Adjacent Joint Arthritis Noted in Patients with Type II DM undergoing Total Ankle Replacement: A 5 Year Follow Up Study

CATEGORY: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Diabetes INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Total Ankle Arthroplasty [TAR] is a recognized treatment for end stage osteoarthritis. Many of these patients also have Type 2 Diabetes. There is a lack of literature of patients undergoing TAR surgery who belong to this cohort and any...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahid, Zuhaib, Hutt, Nicholas, Allport, Jack, Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas, Refiae, Ramsay, Siddique, Malik S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702975/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00435
_version_ 1784621360858791936
author Shahid, Zuhaib
Hutt, Nicholas
Allport, Jack
Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas
Refiae, Ramsay
Siddique, Malik S.
author_facet Shahid, Zuhaib
Hutt, Nicholas
Allport, Jack
Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas
Refiae, Ramsay
Siddique, Malik S.
author_sort Shahid, Zuhaib
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Diabetes INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Total Ankle Arthroplasty [TAR] is a recognized treatment for end stage osteoarthritis. Many of these patients also have Type 2 Diabetes. There is a lack of literature of patients undergoing TAR surgery who belong to this cohort and any available literature has shown negative outcomes in such surgery. We aim to study whether the radiological outcomes of such patients undergoing TAR is different to their non diabetic counterparts performed at our Tertiary center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients undergoing Total Ankle Replacements between 2006 and 2014. Both patients with Type 2 Diabetes and non-diabetic patients were included. Type 1 Diabetics were excluded. Pre-operative screening of patients included thorough clinical assessment including swelling, warmth, erythema and neurovascular assessment including proprioception, vibration and neuro-filament testing. True AP, lateral X-Ray weight bearing views were obtained. MRI or CT scan was carried out on all patients pre-operatively. Patients were reviewed with X-Ray at 3, 6, and 12 month post operatively. Any radiolucency was defined as gap >2mm between the implant and the bone which was not seen at 3 month post op x-ray. Painful ankle replacement implants were investigated by SPECT CT scan. RESULTS: 9(3.9%) of the 230 patients were diabetic. Pre-operative radiographs revealed disease confined to OA, MRI and CT scans showed no evidence of bone debris, fragmentation of articular surfaces, translation of Talus or symptomatic OA in the Subtalar or Talo-navicular joint requiring treatment. Radiological analysis at 5 years demonstrated no evidence of loosening, implant subsidence, migration or periprosthetic cysts. No x-ray progression of arthritis was noted in the Subtalar, Talo-navicular or midfoot joints in Diabetic patient group. At the latest follow up, no radiological features of Charcot arthropathy was noted in the peri-prosthetic area. CONCLUSION: Our radiological outcome study has demonstrated that at minimum of 5 years, patients with diabetes who underwent TAR did not show any progression of arthritis in adjacent joints. Our study highlights that in the absence of diabetic neuropathy, it is safe to offer TAR in patients with Type II DM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8702975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87029752022-01-28 No Progression of Radiological Adjacent Joint Arthritis Noted in Patients with Type II DM undergoing Total Ankle Replacement: A 5 Year Follow Up Study Shahid, Zuhaib Hutt, Nicholas Allport, Jack Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas Refiae, Ramsay Siddique, Malik S. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Diabetes INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Total Ankle Arthroplasty [TAR] is a recognized treatment for end stage osteoarthritis. Many of these patients also have Type 2 Diabetes. There is a lack of literature of patients undergoing TAR surgery who belong to this cohort and any available literature has shown negative outcomes in such surgery. We aim to study whether the radiological outcomes of such patients undergoing TAR is different to their non diabetic counterparts performed at our Tertiary center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients undergoing Total Ankle Replacements between 2006 and 2014. Both patients with Type 2 Diabetes and non-diabetic patients were included. Type 1 Diabetics were excluded. Pre-operative screening of patients included thorough clinical assessment including swelling, warmth, erythema and neurovascular assessment including proprioception, vibration and neuro-filament testing. True AP, lateral X-Ray weight bearing views were obtained. MRI or CT scan was carried out on all patients pre-operatively. Patients were reviewed with X-Ray at 3, 6, and 12 month post operatively. Any radiolucency was defined as gap >2mm between the implant and the bone which was not seen at 3 month post op x-ray. Painful ankle replacement implants were investigated by SPECT CT scan. RESULTS: 9(3.9%) of the 230 patients were diabetic. Pre-operative radiographs revealed disease confined to OA, MRI and CT scans showed no evidence of bone debris, fragmentation of articular surfaces, translation of Talus or symptomatic OA in the Subtalar or Talo-navicular joint requiring treatment. Radiological analysis at 5 years demonstrated no evidence of loosening, implant subsidence, migration or periprosthetic cysts. No x-ray progression of arthritis was noted in the Subtalar, Talo-navicular or midfoot joints in Diabetic patient group. At the latest follow up, no radiological features of Charcot arthropathy was noted in the peri-prosthetic area. CONCLUSION: Our radiological outcome study has demonstrated that at minimum of 5 years, patients with diabetes who underwent TAR did not show any progression of arthritis in adjacent joints. Our study highlights that in the absence of diabetic neuropathy, it is safe to offer TAR in patients with Type II DM. SAGE Publications 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8702975/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00435 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Shahid, Zuhaib
Hutt, Nicholas
Allport, Jack
Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas
Refiae, Ramsay
Siddique, Malik S.
No Progression of Radiological Adjacent Joint Arthritis Noted in Patients with Type II DM undergoing Total Ankle Replacement: A 5 Year Follow Up Study
title No Progression of Radiological Adjacent Joint Arthritis Noted in Patients with Type II DM undergoing Total Ankle Replacement: A 5 Year Follow Up Study
title_full No Progression of Radiological Adjacent Joint Arthritis Noted in Patients with Type II DM undergoing Total Ankle Replacement: A 5 Year Follow Up Study
title_fullStr No Progression of Radiological Adjacent Joint Arthritis Noted in Patients with Type II DM undergoing Total Ankle Replacement: A 5 Year Follow Up Study
title_full_unstemmed No Progression of Radiological Adjacent Joint Arthritis Noted in Patients with Type II DM undergoing Total Ankle Replacement: A 5 Year Follow Up Study
title_short No Progression of Radiological Adjacent Joint Arthritis Noted in Patients with Type II DM undergoing Total Ankle Replacement: A 5 Year Follow Up Study
title_sort no progression of radiological adjacent joint arthritis noted in patients with type ii dm undergoing total ankle replacement: a 5 year follow up study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702975/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00435
work_keys_str_mv AT shahidzuhaib noprogressionofradiologicaladjacentjointarthritisnotedinpatientswithtypeiidmundergoingtotalanklereplacementa5yearfollowupstudy
AT huttnicholas noprogressionofradiologicaladjacentjointarthritisnotedinpatientswithtypeiidmundergoingtotalanklereplacementa5yearfollowupstudy
AT allportjack noprogressionofradiologicaladjacentjointarthritisnotedinpatientswithtypeiidmundergoingtotalanklereplacementa5yearfollowupstudy
AT ramaskandhanjayasreeramas noprogressionofradiologicaladjacentjointarthritisnotedinpatientswithtypeiidmundergoingtotalanklereplacementa5yearfollowupstudy
AT refiaeramsay noprogressionofradiologicaladjacentjointarthritisnotedinpatientswithtypeiidmundergoingtotalanklereplacementa5yearfollowupstudy
AT siddiquemaliks noprogressionofradiologicaladjacentjointarthritisnotedinpatientswithtypeiidmundergoingtotalanklereplacementa5yearfollowupstudy