Cargando…

Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive and Simple Interrupted Nylon Sutures for Wound Closure in Forefoot Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Trial

CATEGORY: Bunion INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: There are many options for wound closure in forefoot surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare topical skin adhesive (2-Octyl-cyanoacrylate) to standard simple interrupted nylon sutures with attention to the quality of wound healing and the acceptabilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ray, Robbie, Goff, Thomas A., Dearden, Paul M., Robinson, Peter W., Lam, Peter, Wines, Andrew P., Lewis, Thomas L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702980/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00396
_version_ 1784621362070945792
author Ray, Robbie
Goff, Thomas A.
Dearden, Paul M.
Robinson, Peter W.
Lam, Peter
Wines, Andrew P.
Lewis, Thomas L.
author_facet Ray, Robbie
Goff, Thomas A.
Dearden, Paul M.
Robinson, Peter W.
Lam, Peter
Wines, Andrew P.
Lewis, Thomas L.
author_sort Ray, Robbie
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Bunion INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: There are many options for wound closure in forefoot surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare topical skin adhesive (2-Octyl-cyanoacrylate) to standard simple interrupted nylon sutures with attention to the quality of wound healing and the acceptability to the patient. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective 1st ray forefoot surgery utilising a medial incision, either Hallux Valgus correction or 1st Metotarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis, were recruited to this study. Patients were randomly allocated during surgery to final layer wound closure with either the intervention topical skin adhesive (TSA) or the control interrupted nylon sutures (INS). Practicality was assessed by time taken for wound closure and subsequent time to perform wound care at 2 weeks postoperatively, wound care pain (VAS) and quality of wound healing was assessed at this point with a dedicated scoring tool, patient satisfaction and acceptability was assessed at 6 weeks postoperative. RESULTS: 70 patients (18 bilateral) were recruited, resulting 42 feet in each study group (after 4 exclusions for incomplete data set). Mean age 61 (29-83). There were no statistical differences in the demographics or surgery performed between groups. Wound closure time was significantly slower for TSA (272 secs (SD 72.2) vs 229 secs (SD 58.8), p=0.0038). At 2 weeks postoperative wound care time was significantly faster for TSA (71 secs (SD 50.8) vs 120 Secs (SD 47.8), p<0.0001), and patient reported pain was significantly less with TSA (VAS 0 vs 2, p=0.025). Significantly more inflammation and wound edge separation was recorded with TSA (17 vs 5 cases, p=0.006) and (12 vs 3 cases, p=0.02) respectively. High satisfaction was reported in both groups with no signifcant difference. CONCLUSION: Topical skin adhesive and interrupted nylon sutures are both acceptable closure methods for forefoot surgery with high satisfaction rates, low pain scores and low complications. However, the observation of significantly more inflammation and areas of wound separation at the early post-operative period with topical skin adhesive is sufficient to recommend routine use of sutures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8702980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87029802022-01-28 Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive and Simple Interrupted Nylon Sutures for Wound Closure in Forefoot Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Trial Ray, Robbie Goff, Thomas A. Dearden, Paul M. Robinson, Peter W. Lam, Peter Wines, Andrew P. Lewis, Thomas L. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Bunion INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: There are many options for wound closure in forefoot surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare topical skin adhesive (2-Octyl-cyanoacrylate) to standard simple interrupted nylon sutures with attention to the quality of wound healing and the acceptability to the patient. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective 1st ray forefoot surgery utilising a medial incision, either Hallux Valgus correction or 1st Metotarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis, were recruited to this study. Patients were randomly allocated during surgery to final layer wound closure with either the intervention topical skin adhesive (TSA) or the control interrupted nylon sutures (INS). Practicality was assessed by time taken for wound closure and subsequent time to perform wound care at 2 weeks postoperatively, wound care pain (VAS) and quality of wound healing was assessed at this point with a dedicated scoring tool, patient satisfaction and acceptability was assessed at 6 weeks postoperative. RESULTS: 70 patients (18 bilateral) were recruited, resulting 42 feet in each study group (after 4 exclusions for incomplete data set). Mean age 61 (29-83). There were no statistical differences in the demographics or surgery performed between groups. Wound closure time was significantly slower for TSA (272 secs (SD 72.2) vs 229 secs (SD 58.8), p=0.0038). At 2 weeks postoperative wound care time was significantly faster for TSA (71 secs (SD 50.8) vs 120 Secs (SD 47.8), p<0.0001), and patient reported pain was significantly less with TSA (VAS 0 vs 2, p=0.025). Significantly more inflammation and wound edge separation was recorded with TSA (17 vs 5 cases, p=0.006) and (12 vs 3 cases, p=0.02) respectively. High satisfaction was reported in both groups with no signifcant difference. CONCLUSION: Topical skin adhesive and interrupted nylon sutures are both acceptable closure methods for forefoot surgery with high satisfaction rates, low pain scores and low complications. However, the observation of significantly more inflammation and areas of wound separation at the early post-operative period with topical skin adhesive is sufficient to recommend routine use of sutures. SAGE Publications 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8702980/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00396 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Ray, Robbie
Goff, Thomas A.
Dearden, Paul M.
Robinson, Peter W.
Lam, Peter
Wines, Andrew P.
Lewis, Thomas L.
Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive and Simple Interrupted Nylon Sutures for Wound Closure in Forefoot Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive and Simple Interrupted Nylon Sutures for Wound Closure in Forefoot Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title_full Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive and Simple Interrupted Nylon Sutures for Wound Closure in Forefoot Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive and Simple Interrupted Nylon Sutures for Wound Closure in Forefoot Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive and Simple Interrupted Nylon Sutures for Wound Closure in Forefoot Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title_short Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive and Simple Interrupted Nylon Sutures for Wound Closure in Forefoot Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title_sort comparison of topical skin adhesive and simple interrupted nylon sutures for wound closure in forefoot surgery: a prospective randomised trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702980/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00396
work_keys_str_mv AT rayrobbie comparisonoftopicalskinadhesiveandsimpleinterruptednylonsuturesforwoundclosureinforefootsurgeryaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT goffthomasa comparisonoftopicalskinadhesiveandsimpleinterruptednylonsuturesforwoundclosureinforefootsurgeryaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT deardenpaulm comparisonoftopicalskinadhesiveandsimpleinterruptednylonsuturesforwoundclosureinforefootsurgeryaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT robinsonpeterw comparisonoftopicalskinadhesiveandsimpleinterruptednylonsuturesforwoundclosureinforefootsurgeryaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT lampeter comparisonoftopicalskinadhesiveandsimpleinterruptednylonsuturesforwoundclosureinforefootsurgeryaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT winesandrewp comparisonoftopicalskinadhesiveandsimpleinterruptednylonsuturesforwoundclosureinforefootsurgeryaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT lewisthomasl comparisonoftopicalskinadhesiveandsimpleinterruptednylonsuturesforwoundclosureinforefootsurgeryaprospectiverandomisedtrial