Cargando…

Evaluation of protection by COVID-19 vaccines after deployment in low and lower-middle income countries

The availability and use of vaccines for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in low and middle-income countries (L/MICs) lags far behind more affluent countries, and vaccines currently used in L/MICs are predominantly of lower efficacy. As vaccines continue to be rolled out in L/MICs, successful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clemens, John, Aziz, Asma Binte, Tadesse, Birkneh Tilahun, Kang, Sophie, Marks, Florian, Kim, Jerome
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101253
_version_ 1784621379302195200
author Clemens, John
Aziz, Asma Binte
Tadesse, Birkneh Tilahun
Kang, Sophie
Marks, Florian
Kim, Jerome
author_facet Clemens, John
Aziz, Asma Binte
Tadesse, Birkneh Tilahun
Kang, Sophie
Marks, Florian
Kim, Jerome
author_sort Clemens, John
collection PubMed
description The availability and use of vaccines for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in low and middle-income countries (L/MICs) lags far behind more affluent countries, and vaccines currently used in L/MICs are predominantly of lower efficacy. As vaccines continue to be rolled out in L/MICs, successful control of COVID-19 by vaccines requires monitoring both of vaccine protection of vaccinees (effectiveness) and of the entire targeted populations, including vaccine herd protection of non-vaccinees (impact). To be of greatest relevance to L/MICs, there is the need to address the distinctive medical and demographic features of populations, health systems, and demography that may greatly affect vaccine performance in these settings. We identified 58 published studies that included 85 evaluations of the effectiveness of different COVID-19 vaccines globally. Only three were done in L/MICs, and no impact studies were identified in these settings. Post-deployment studies of the protection by COVID-19 vaccines rolled out in L/MICs constitute an important but currently neglected global priority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8703050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87030502021-12-28 Evaluation of protection by COVID-19 vaccines after deployment in low and lower-middle income countries Clemens, John Aziz, Asma Binte Tadesse, Birkneh Tilahun Kang, Sophie Marks, Florian Kim, Jerome EClinicalMedicine Review The availability and use of vaccines for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in low and middle-income countries (L/MICs) lags far behind more affluent countries, and vaccines currently used in L/MICs are predominantly of lower efficacy. As vaccines continue to be rolled out in L/MICs, successful control of COVID-19 by vaccines requires monitoring both of vaccine protection of vaccinees (effectiveness) and of the entire targeted populations, including vaccine herd protection of non-vaccinees (impact). To be of greatest relevance to L/MICs, there is the need to address the distinctive medical and demographic features of populations, health systems, and demography that may greatly affect vaccine performance in these settings. We identified 58 published studies that included 85 evaluations of the effectiveness of different COVID-19 vaccines globally. Only three were done in L/MICs, and no impact studies were identified in these settings. Post-deployment studies of the protection by COVID-19 vaccines rolled out in L/MICs constitute an important but currently neglected global priority. Elsevier 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8703050/ /pubmed/34977517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101253 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Clemens, John
Aziz, Asma Binte
Tadesse, Birkneh Tilahun
Kang, Sophie
Marks, Florian
Kim, Jerome
Evaluation of protection by COVID-19 vaccines after deployment in low and lower-middle income countries
title Evaluation of protection by COVID-19 vaccines after deployment in low and lower-middle income countries
title_full Evaluation of protection by COVID-19 vaccines after deployment in low and lower-middle income countries
title_fullStr Evaluation of protection by COVID-19 vaccines after deployment in low and lower-middle income countries
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of protection by COVID-19 vaccines after deployment in low and lower-middle income countries
title_short Evaluation of protection by COVID-19 vaccines after deployment in low and lower-middle income countries
title_sort evaluation of protection by covid-19 vaccines after deployment in low and lower-middle income countries
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101253
work_keys_str_mv AT clemensjohn evaluationofprotectionbycovid19vaccinesafterdeploymentinlowandlowermiddleincomecountries
AT azizasmabinte evaluationofprotectionbycovid19vaccinesafterdeploymentinlowandlowermiddleincomecountries
AT tadessebirknehtilahun evaluationofprotectionbycovid19vaccinesafterdeploymentinlowandlowermiddleincomecountries
AT kangsophie evaluationofprotectionbycovid19vaccinesafterdeploymentinlowandlowermiddleincomecountries
AT marksflorian evaluationofprotectionbycovid19vaccinesafterdeploymentinlowandlowermiddleincomecountries
AT kimjerome evaluationofprotectionbycovid19vaccinesafterdeploymentinlowandlowermiddleincomecountries