Cargando…

Pesticide Toxicity Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices

Pesticides are widely used in food production, yet the potential harm associated with their emission into the environment is rarely considered in the context of sustainable diets. In this study, a life cycle assessment was used to quantify the freshwater ecotoxicity, human toxicity carcinogenic effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridoutt, Bradley, Baird, Danielle, Navarro, Javier, Hendrie, Gilly A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34959866
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13124314
_version_ 1784621423716728832
author Ridoutt, Bradley
Baird, Danielle
Navarro, Javier
Hendrie, Gilly A.
author_facet Ridoutt, Bradley
Baird, Danielle
Navarro, Javier
Hendrie, Gilly A.
author_sort Ridoutt, Bradley
collection PubMed
description Pesticides are widely used in food production, yet the potential harm associated with their emission into the environment is rarely considered in the context of sustainable diets. In this study, a life cycle assessment was used to quantify the freshwater ecotoxicity, human toxicity carcinogenic effects, and human toxicity noncarcinogenic effects associated with pesticide use in relation to 9341 individual Australian adult daily diets. The three environmental indicators were also combined into a pesticide toxicity footprint, and a diet quality score was applied to each diet. Energy-dense and nutrient-poor discretionary foods, fruits, and protein-rich foods were the sources of most of the dietary pesticide impacts. Problematically, a dietary shift toward recommended diets was found to increase the pesticide toxicity footprint compared to the current average diet. Using a quadrant analysis, a recommended diet was identified with a 38% lower pesticide toxicity footprint. This was achieved mainly through a reduction in the discretionary food intake and by limiting the choice of fresh fruits. As the latter contradicts dietary recommendations to eat a variety of fruits of different types and colors, we concluded that dietary change may not be the best approach to lowering the environmental impacts of pesticides in the food system. Instead, targeted action in the horticultural industry may be more effective. Consumers might encourage this transition by supporting growers that reduce pesticide use and apply less environmentally harmful active ingredients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8703275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87032752021-12-25 Pesticide Toxicity Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices Ridoutt, Bradley Baird, Danielle Navarro, Javier Hendrie, Gilly A. Nutrients Article Pesticides are widely used in food production, yet the potential harm associated with their emission into the environment is rarely considered in the context of sustainable diets. In this study, a life cycle assessment was used to quantify the freshwater ecotoxicity, human toxicity carcinogenic effects, and human toxicity noncarcinogenic effects associated with pesticide use in relation to 9341 individual Australian adult daily diets. The three environmental indicators were also combined into a pesticide toxicity footprint, and a diet quality score was applied to each diet. Energy-dense and nutrient-poor discretionary foods, fruits, and protein-rich foods were the sources of most of the dietary pesticide impacts. Problematically, a dietary shift toward recommended diets was found to increase the pesticide toxicity footprint compared to the current average diet. Using a quadrant analysis, a recommended diet was identified with a 38% lower pesticide toxicity footprint. This was achieved mainly through a reduction in the discretionary food intake and by limiting the choice of fresh fruits. As the latter contradicts dietary recommendations to eat a variety of fruits of different types and colors, we concluded that dietary change may not be the best approach to lowering the environmental impacts of pesticides in the food system. Instead, targeted action in the horticultural industry may be more effective. Consumers might encourage this transition by supporting growers that reduce pesticide use and apply less environmentally harmful active ingredients. MDPI 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8703275/ /pubmed/34959866 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13124314 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ridoutt, Bradley
Baird, Danielle
Navarro, Javier
Hendrie, Gilly A.
Pesticide Toxicity Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title Pesticide Toxicity Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title_full Pesticide Toxicity Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title_fullStr Pesticide Toxicity Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title_full_unstemmed Pesticide Toxicity Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title_short Pesticide Toxicity Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title_sort pesticide toxicity footprints of australian dietary choices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34959866
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13124314
work_keys_str_mv AT ridouttbradley pesticidetoxicityfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices
AT bairddanielle pesticidetoxicityfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices
AT navarrojavier pesticidetoxicityfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices
AT hendriegillya pesticidetoxicityfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices