Cargando…

Solar Radiation Flux Provides a Method of Quantifying Weed-Crop Balance in Present and Future Climates

A systematic approach to quantifying the weed–crop balance through the flux of solar radiation was developed and tested on commercial fields in a long-established Atlantic zone cropland. Measuring and modelling solar energy flux in crop stands has become standard practice in analysis and comparison...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Squire, Geoffrey R., Young, Mark W., Hawes, Cathy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34961128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10122657
_version_ 1784621499721711616
author Squire, Geoffrey R.
Young, Mark W.
Hawes, Cathy
author_facet Squire, Geoffrey R.
Young, Mark W.
Hawes, Cathy
author_sort Squire, Geoffrey R.
collection PubMed
description A systematic approach to quantifying the weed–crop balance through the flux of solar radiation was developed and tested on commercial fields in a long-established Atlantic zone cropland. Measuring and modelling solar energy flux in crop stands has become standard practice in analysis and comparison of crop growth and yield across regions, species and years. In a similar manner, the partitioning of incoming radiation between crops and the in-field plant community may provide ‘common currencies’ through which to quantify positive and negative effects of weeds in relation to global change. Here, possibilities were explored for converting simple ground-cover measures in commercial fields of winter and spring oilseed rape in eastern Scotland, UK to metrics of solar flux. Solar radiation intercepted by the crops ranged with season and sowing delay from 129 to 1975 MJ m(−2) (15-fold). Radiation transmitted through the crop, together with local weed management, resulted in a 70-fold range of weed intercepted radiation (14.2 to 963 MJ m(−2)), which in turn explained 93% of the corresponding between-site variation in weed dry mass (6.36 to 459 g m(−2)). Transmitted radiation explained almost 90% of the variation in number of weed species per field (12 to 40). The conversion of intercepted radiation to weed dry matter was far less variable at a mean of 0.74 g MJ(−1) at both winter and spring sites. The primary cause of variation was an interaction between the temperature at sowing and the annual wave of incoming solar radiation. The high degree of explanatory power in solar flux indicates its potential use as an initial predictor and subsequent monitoring tool in the face of future change in climate and cropping intensity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8703587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87035872021-12-25 Solar Radiation Flux Provides a Method of Quantifying Weed-Crop Balance in Present and Future Climates Squire, Geoffrey R. Young, Mark W. Hawes, Cathy Plants (Basel) Article A systematic approach to quantifying the weed–crop balance through the flux of solar radiation was developed and tested on commercial fields in a long-established Atlantic zone cropland. Measuring and modelling solar energy flux in crop stands has become standard practice in analysis and comparison of crop growth and yield across regions, species and years. In a similar manner, the partitioning of incoming radiation between crops and the in-field plant community may provide ‘common currencies’ through which to quantify positive and negative effects of weeds in relation to global change. Here, possibilities were explored for converting simple ground-cover measures in commercial fields of winter and spring oilseed rape in eastern Scotland, UK to metrics of solar flux. Solar radiation intercepted by the crops ranged with season and sowing delay from 129 to 1975 MJ m(−2) (15-fold). Radiation transmitted through the crop, together with local weed management, resulted in a 70-fold range of weed intercepted radiation (14.2 to 963 MJ m(−2)), which in turn explained 93% of the corresponding between-site variation in weed dry mass (6.36 to 459 g m(−2)). Transmitted radiation explained almost 90% of the variation in number of weed species per field (12 to 40). The conversion of intercepted radiation to weed dry matter was far less variable at a mean of 0.74 g MJ(−1) at both winter and spring sites. The primary cause of variation was an interaction between the temperature at sowing and the annual wave of incoming solar radiation. The high degree of explanatory power in solar flux indicates its potential use as an initial predictor and subsequent monitoring tool in the face of future change in climate and cropping intensity. MDPI 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8703587/ /pubmed/34961128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10122657 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Squire, Geoffrey R.
Young, Mark W.
Hawes, Cathy
Solar Radiation Flux Provides a Method of Quantifying Weed-Crop Balance in Present and Future Climates
title Solar Radiation Flux Provides a Method of Quantifying Weed-Crop Balance in Present and Future Climates
title_full Solar Radiation Flux Provides a Method of Quantifying Weed-Crop Balance in Present and Future Climates
title_fullStr Solar Radiation Flux Provides a Method of Quantifying Weed-Crop Balance in Present and Future Climates
title_full_unstemmed Solar Radiation Flux Provides a Method of Quantifying Weed-Crop Balance in Present and Future Climates
title_short Solar Radiation Flux Provides a Method of Quantifying Weed-Crop Balance in Present and Future Climates
title_sort solar radiation flux provides a method of quantifying weed-crop balance in present and future climates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34961128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10122657
work_keys_str_mv AT squiregeoffreyr solarradiationfluxprovidesamethodofquantifyingweedcropbalanceinpresentandfutureclimates
AT youngmarkw solarradiationfluxprovidesamethodofquantifyingweedcropbalanceinpresentandfutureclimates
AT hawescathy solarradiationfluxprovidesamethodofquantifyingweedcropbalanceinpresentandfutureclimates