Cargando…

A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems

Optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric (SP) systems are widely used in human movement research for clinical diagnostics, interventional applications, and as a reference system for validating alternative technologies. Regardless of the application, SP systems exhibit different random and systematic err...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Kirsty, Bonci, Tecla, Alcock, Lisa, Buckley, Ellen, Hansen, Clint, Gazit, Eran, Schwickert, Lars, Cereatti, Andrea, Mazzà, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960317
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248223
_version_ 1784621527043407872
author Scott, Kirsty
Bonci, Tecla
Alcock, Lisa
Buckley, Ellen
Hansen, Clint
Gazit, Eran
Schwickert, Lars
Cereatti, Andrea
Mazzà, Claudia
author_facet Scott, Kirsty
Bonci, Tecla
Alcock, Lisa
Buckley, Ellen
Hansen, Clint
Gazit, Eran
Schwickert, Lars
Cereatti, Andrea
Mazzà, Claudia
author_sort Scott, Kirsty
collection PubMed
description Optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric (SP) systems are widely used in human movement research for clinical diagnostics, interventional applications, and as a reference system for validating alternative technologies. Regardless of the application, SP systems exhibit different random and systematic errors depending on camera specifications, system setup and laboratory environment, which hinders comparing SP data between sessions and across different systems. While many methods have been proposed to quantify and report the errors of SP systems, they are rarely utilized due to their complexity and need for additional equipment. In response, an easy-to-use quality control (QC) check has been designed that can be completed immediately prior to a data collection. This QC check requires minimal training for the operator and no additional equipment. In addition, a custom graphical user interface ensures automatic processing of the errors in an easy-to-read format for immediate interpretation. On initial deployment in a multicentric study, the check (i) proved to be feasible to perform in a short timeframe with minimal burden to the operator, and (ii) quantified the level of random and systematic errors between sessions and systems, ensuring comparability of data in a variety of protocol setups, including repeated measures, longitudinal studies and multicentric studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8703700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87037002021-12-25 A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems Scott, Kirsty Bonci, Tecla Alcock, Lisa Buckley, Ellen Hansen, Clint Gazit, Eran Schwickert, Lars Cereatti, Andrea Mazzà, Claudia Sensors (Basel) Article Optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric (SP) systems are widely used in human movement research for clinical diagnostics, interventional applications, and as a reference system for validating alternative technologies. Regardless of the application, SP systems exhibit different random and systematic errors depending on camera specifications, system setup and laboratory environment, which hinders comparing SP data between sessions and across different systems. While many methods have been proposed to quantify and report the errors of SP systems, they are rarely utilized due to their complexity and need for additional equipment. In response, an easy-to-use quality control (QC) check has been designed that can be completed immediately prior to a data collection. This QC check requires minimal training for the operator and no additional equipment. In addition, a custom graphical user interface ensures automatic processing of the errors in an easy-to-read format for immediate interpretation. On initial deployment in a multicentric study, the check (i) proved to be feasible to perform in a short timeframe with minimal burden to the operator, and (ii) quantified the level of random and systematic errors between sessions and systems, ensuring comparability of data in a variety of protocol setups, including repeated measures, longitudinal studies and multicentric studies. MDPI 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8703700/ /pubmed/34960317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248223 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Scott, Kirsty
Bonci, Tecla
Alcock, Lisa
Buckley, Ellen
Hansen, Clint
Gazit, Eran
Schwickert, Lars
Cereatti, Andrea
Mazzà, Claudia
A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems
title A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems
title_full A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems
title_fullStr A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems
title_full_unstemmed A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems
title_short A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems
title_sort quality control check to ensure comparability of stereophotogrammetric data between sessions and systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960317
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248223
work_keys_str_mv AT scottkirsty aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT boncitecla aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT alcocklisa aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT buckleyellen aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT hansenclint aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT gaziteran aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT schwickertlars aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT cereattiandrea aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT mazzaclaudia aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT scottkirsty qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT boncitecla qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT alcocklisa qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT buckleyellen qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT hansenclint qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT gaziteran qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT schwickertlars qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT cereattiandrea qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT mazzaclaudia qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems
AT qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems