Cargando…
A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems
Optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric (SP) systems are widely used in human movement research for clinical diagnostics, interventional applications, and as a reference system for validating alternative technologies. Regardless of the application, SP systems exhibit different random and systematic err...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248223 |
_version_ | 1784621527043407872 |
---|---|
author | Scott, Kirsty Bonci, Tecla Alcock, Lisa Buckley, Ellen Hansen, Clint Gazit, Eran Schwickert, Lars Cereatti, Andrea Mazzà, Claudia |
author_facet | Scott, Kirsty Bonci, Tecla Alcock, Lisa Buckley, Ellen Hansen, Clint Gazit, Eran Schwickert, Lars Cereatti, Andrea Mazzà, Claudia |
author_sort | Scott, Kirsty |
collection | PubMed |
description | Optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric (SP) systems are widely used in human movement research for clinical diagnostics, interventional applications, and as a reference system for validating alternative technologies. Regardless of the application, SP systems exhibit different random and systematic errors depending on camera specifications, system setup and laboratory environment, which hinders comparing SP data between sessions and across different systems. While many methods have been proposed to quantify and report the errors of SP systems, they are rarely utilized due to their complexity and need for additional equipment. In response, an easy-to-use quality control (QC) check has been designed that can be completed immediately prior to a data collection. This QC check requires minimal training for the operator and no additional equipment. In addition, a custom graphical user interface ensures automatic processing of the errors in an easy-to-read format for immediate interpretation. On initial deployment in a multicentric study, the check (i) proved to be feasible to perform in a short timeframe with minimal burden to the operator, and (ii) quantified the level of random and systematic errors between sessions and systems, ensuring comparability of data in a variety of protocol setups, including repeated measures, longitudinal studies and multicentric studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8703700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87037002021-12-25 A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems Scott, Kirsty Bonci, Tecla Alcock, Lisa Buckley, Ellen Hansen, Clint Gazit, Eran Schwickert, Lars Cereatti, Andrea Mazzà, Claudia Sensors (Basel) Article Optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric (SP) systems are widely used in human movement research for clinical diagnostics, interventional applications, and as a reference system for validating alternative technologies. Regardless of the application, SP systems exhibit different random and systematic errors depending on camera specifications, system setup and laboratory environment, which hinders comparing SP data between sessions and across different systems. While many methods have been proposed to quantify and report the errors of SP systems, they are rarely utilized due to their complexity and need for additional equipment. In response, an easy-to-use quality control (QC) check has been designed that can be completed immediately prior to a data collection. This QC check requires minimal training for the operator and no additional equipment. In addition, a custom graphical user interface ensures automatic processing of the errors in an easy-to-read format for immediate interpretation. On initial deployment in a multicentric study, the check (i) proved to be feasible to perform in a short timeframe with minimal burden to the operator, and (ii) quantified the level of random and systematic errors between sessions and systems, ensuring comparability of data in a variety of protocol setups, including repeated measures, longitudinal studies and multicentric studies. MDPI 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8703700/ /pubmed/34960317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248223 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Scott, Kirsty Bonci, Tecla Alcock, Lisa Buckley, Ellen Hansen, Clint Gazit, Eran Schwickert, Lars Cereatti, Andrea Mazzà, Claudia A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems |
title | A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems |
title_full | A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems |
title_fullStr | A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems |
title_short | A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems |
title_sort | quality control check to ensure comparability of stereophotogrammetric data between sessions and systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scottkirsty aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT boncitecla aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT alcocklisa aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT buckleyellen aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT hansenclint aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT gaziteran aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT schwickertlars aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT cereattiandrea aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT mazzaclaudia aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT aqualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT scottkirsty qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT boncitecla qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT alcocklisa qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT buckleyellen qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT hansenclint qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT gaziteran qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT schwickertlars qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT cereattiandrea qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT mazzaclaudia qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems AT qualitycontrolchecktoensurecomparabilityofstereophotogrammetricdatabetweensessionsandsystems |