Cargando…

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Modified Pectoral Nerve Blocks Type II (PECS II) for Vascular Access Port Implantation Using Cephalic Vein Venesection

The vascular access port implantation procedure can be performed using the venesection method by inserting a catheter into the cephalic vein in the region of the deltopectoral groove. This method eliminates the need for catheter tunneling. An alternative method to infiltration anaesthesia for port i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janc, Jarosław, Szamborski, Marek, Milnerowicz, Artur, Łysenko, Lidia, Leśnik, Patrycja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245759
_version_ 1784621554981666816
author Janc, Jarosław
Szamborski, Marek
Milnerowicz, Artur
Łysenko, Lidia
Leśnik, Patrycja
author_facet Janc, Jarosław
Szamborski, Marek
Milnerowicz, Artur
Łysenko, Lidia
Leśnik, Patrycja
author_sort Janc, Jarosław
collection PubMed
description The vascular access port implantation procedure can be performed using the venesection method by inserting a catheter into the cephalic vein in the region of the deltopectoral groove. This method eliminates the need for catheter tunneling. An alternative method to infiltration anaesthesia for port implantation may be a modified pectoral nerve block type II (PECS II). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of modified PECS II for vascular access port implantation using cephalic vein venesection. This retrospective observational study was conducted at the 4th Military Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw, Poland. A group of 114 patients underwent the modified PECS II block and additional cutaneous infiltration anesthesia at the incision line. Pain intensity was assessed on the NRS scale measured intraoperatively at four points. The QoR-15 questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction during the first 24 h after surgery. The operator’s condition assessment score was used to assess surgical conditions and operator comfort. The analysis showed that the median pain intensity during vascular port implantation was 0. A statistically significant difference in pain intensity was demonstrated between the specialist’s group and the resident’s group at the second and third measurement points (p < 0.008; p < 0.012). The mean value on the QoR-15 scale was 132. There was a significant difference between the pain scores of the groups. The mean score in the pain position in the specialist’s group was 18 points and in the resident’s group, it was 19 points (p < 0.029). In conclusion, the present study revealed that the modified PECS II block is an effective and safe method of anesthesia for Port-A-Cath implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8703813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87038132021-12-25 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Modified Pectoral Nerve Blocks Type II (PECS II) for Vascular Access Port Implantation Using Cephalic Vein Venesection Janc, Jarosław Szamborski, Marek Milnerowicz, Artur Łysenko, Lidia Leśnik, Patrycja J Clin Med Article The vascular access port implantation procedure can be performed using the venesection method by inserting a catheter into the cephalic vein in the region of the deltopectoral groove. This method eliminates the need for catheter tunneling. An alternative method to infiltration anaesthesia for port implantation may be a modified pectoral nerve block type II (PECS II). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of modified PECS II for vascular access port implantation using cephalic vein venesection. This retrospective observational study was conducted at the 4th Military Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw, Poland. A group of 114 patients underwent the modified PECS II block and additional cutaneous infiltration anesthesia at the incision line. Pain intensity was assessed on the NRS scale measured intraoperatively at four points. The QoR-15 questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction during the first 24 h after surgery. The operator’s condition assessment score was used to assess surgical conditions and operator comfort. The analysis showed that the median pain intensity during vascular port implantation was 0. A statistically significant difference in pain intensity was demonstrated between the specialist’s group and the resident’s group at the second and third measurement points (p < 0.008; p < 0.012). The mean value on the QoR-15 scale was 132. There was a significant difference between the pain scores of the groups. The mean score in the pain position in the specialist’s group was 18 points and in the resident’s group, it was 19 points (p < 0.029). In conclusion, the present study revealed that the modified PECS II block is an effective and safe method of anesthesia for Port-A-Cath implantation. MDPI 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8703813/ /pubmed/34945054 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245759 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Janc, Jarosław
Szamborski, Marek
Milnerowicz, Artur
Łysenko, Lidia
Leśnik, Patrycja
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Modified Pectoral Nerve Blocks Type II (PECS II) for Vascular Access Port Implantation Using Cephalic Vein Venesection
title Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Modified Pectoral Nerve Blocks Type II (PECS II) for Vascular Access Port Implantation Using Cephalic Vein Venesection
title_full Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Modified Pectoral Nerve Blocks Type II (PECS II) for Vascular Access Port Implantation Using Cephalic Vein Venesection
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Modified Pectoral Nerve Blocks Type II (PECS II) for Vascular Access Port Implantation Using Cephalic Vein Venesection
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Modified Pectoral Nerve Blocks Type II (PECS II) for Vascular Access Port Implantation Using Cephalic Vein Venesection
title_short Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Modified Pectoral Nerve Blocks Type II (PECS II) for Vascular Access Port Implantation Using Cephalic Vein Venesection
title_sort evaluation of the effectiveness of modified pectoral nerve blocks type ii (pecs ii) for vascular access port implantation using cephalic vein venesection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245759
work_keys_str_mv AT jancjarosław evaluationoftheeffectivenessofmodifiedpectoralnerveblockstypeiipecsiiforvascularaccessportimplantationusingcephalicveinvenesection
AT szamborskimarek evaluationoftheeffectivenessofmodifiedpectoralnerveblockstypeiipecsiiforvascularaccessportimplantationusingcephalicveinvenesection
AT milnerowiczartur evaluationoftheeffectivenessofmodifiedpectoralnerveblockstypeiipecsiiforvascularaccessportimplantationusingcephalicveinvenesection
AT łysenkolidia evaluationoftheeffectivenessofmodifiedpectoralnerveblockstypeiipecsiiforvascularaccessportimplantationusingcephalicveinvenesection
AT lesnikpatrycja evaluationoftheeffectivenessofmodifiedpectoralnerveblockstypeiipecsiiforvascularaccessportimplantationusingcephalicveinvenesection