Cargando…
Who funded the research behind the Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine?
OBJECTIVES: The Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Vaxzevira or Covishield) builds on two decades of research and development (R&D) into chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored vaccine (ChAdOx) technology at the University of Oxford. This study aimed to approximate the funding for the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34937701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007321 |
_version_ | 1784621607526858752 |
---|---|
author | Cross, Samuel Rho, Yeanuk Reddy, Henna Pepperrell, Toby Rodgers, Florence Osborne, Rhiannon Eni-Olotu, Ayolola Banerjee, Rishi Wimmer, Sabrina Keestra, Sarai |
author_facet | Cross, Samuel Rho, Yeanuk Reddy, Henna Pepperrell, Toby Rodgers, Florence Osborne, Rhiannon Eni-Olotu, Ayolola Banerjee, Rishi Wimmer, Sabrina Keestra, Sarai |
author_sort | Cross, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Vaxzevira or Covishield) builds on two decades of research and development (R&D) into chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored vaccine (ChAdOx) technology at the University of Oxford. This study aimed to approximate the funding for the R&D of ChAdOx and the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine and to assess the transparency of funding reporting mechanisms. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review and publication history analysis of the principal investigators to reconstruct R&D funding the ChAdOx technology. We matched award numbers with publicly accessible grant databases. We filed freedom of information (FOI) requests to the University of Oxford for the disclosure of all grants for ChAdOx R&D. RESULTS: We identified 100 peer-reviewed articles relevant to ChAdOx technology published between January 2002 and October 2020, extracting 577 mentions of funding bodies from acknowledgements. Government funders from overseas (including the European Union) were mentioned 158 times (27.4%), the UK government 147 (25.5%) and charitable funders 138 (23.9%). Grant award numbers were identified for 215 (37.3%) mentions; amounts were publicly available for 121 (21.0%). Based on the FOIs, until December 2019, the biggest funders of ChAdOx R&D were the European Commission (34.0%), Wellcome Trust (20.4%) and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (17.5%). Since January 2020, the UK government contributed 95.5% of funding identified. The total identified R&D funding was £104 226 076 reported in the FOIs and £228 466 771 reconstructed from the literature search. CONCLUSION: Our study approximates that public and charitable financing accounted for 97%–99% of identifiable funding for the ChAdOx vaccine technology research at the University of Oxford underlying the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine until autumn 2020. We encountered a lack of transparency in research funding reporting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8704023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87040232021-12-27 Who funded the research behind the Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine? Cross, Samuel Rho, Yeanuk Reddy, Henna Pepperrell, Toby Rodgers, Florence Osborne, Rhiannon Eni-Olotu, Ayolola Banerjee, Rishi Wimmer, Sabrina Keestra, Sarai BMJ Glob Health Original Research OBJECTIVES: The Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Vaxzevira or Covishield) builds on two decades of research and development (R&D) into chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored vaccine (ChAdOx) technology at the University of Oxford. This study aimed to approximate the funding for the R&D of ChAdOx and the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine and to assess the transparency of funding reporting mechanisms. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review and publication history analysis of the principal investigators to reconstruct R&D funding the ChAdOx technology. We matched award numbers with publicly accessible grant databases. We filed freedom of information (FOI) requests to the University of Oxford for the disclosure of all grants for ChAdOx R&D. RESULTS: We identified 100 peer-reviewed articles relevant to ChAdOx technology published between January 2002 and October 2020, extracting 577 mentions of funding bodies from acknowledgements. Government funders from overseas (including the European Union) were mentioned 158 times (27.4%), the UK government 147 (25.5%) and charitable funders 138 (23.9%). Grant award numbers were identified for 215 (37.3%) mentions; amounts were publicly available for 121 (21.0%). Based on the FOIs, until December 2019, the biggest funders of ChAdOx R&D were the European Commission (34.0%), Wellcome Trust (20.4%) and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (17.5%). Since January 2020, the UK government contributed 95.5% of funding identified. The total identified R&D funding was £104 226 076 reported in the FOIs and £228 466 771 reconstructed from the literature search. CONCLUSION: Our study approximates that public and charitable financing accounted for 97%–99% of identifiable funding for the ChAdOx vaccine technology research at the University of Oxford underlying the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine until autumn 2020. We encountered a lack of transparency in research funding reporting. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8704023/ /pubmed/34937701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007321 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Cross, Samuel Rho, Yeanuk Reddy, Henna Pepperrell, Toby Rodgers, Florence Osborne, Rhiannon Eni-Olotu, Ayolola Banerjee, Rishi Wimmer, Sabrina Keestra, Sarai Who funded the research behind the Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine? |
title | Who funded the research behind the Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine? |
title_full | Who funded the research behind the Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine? |
title_fullStr | Who funded the research behind the Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine? |
title_full_unstemmed | Who funded the research behind the Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine? |
title_short | Who funded the research behind the Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine? |
title_sort | who funded the research behind the oxford–astrazeneca covid-19 vaccine? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34937701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007321 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crosssamuel whofundedtheresearchbehindtheoxfordastrazenecacovid19vaccine AT rhoyeanuk whofundedtheresearchbehindtheoxfordastrazenecacovid19vaccine AT reddyhenna whofundedtheresearchbehindtheoxfordastrazenecacovid19vaccine AT pepperrelltoby whofundedtheresearchbehindtheoxfordastrazenecacovid19vaccine AT rodgersflorence whofundedtheresearchbehindtheoxfordastrazenecacovid19vaccine AT osbornerhiannon whofundedtheresearchbehindtheoxfordastrazenecacovid19vaccine AT eniolotuayolola whofundedtheresearchbehindtheoxfordastrazenecacovid19vaccine AT banerjeerishi whofundedtheresearchbehindtheoxfordastrazenecacovid19vaccine AT wimmersabrina whofundedtheresearchbehindtheoxfordastrazenecacovid19vaccine AT keestrasarai whofundedtheresearchbehindtheoxfordastrazenecacovid19vaccine |