Cargando…

Efficacy of 4.0 mg versus 0.4 mg Folic Acid Supplementation on the Reproductive Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Folic acid (FA) supplementation prevents neural tube defects (NTDs), but the effects on other reproductive outcomes are unclear. While common recommendation is 0.4 mg/day in addition to regular nutrition, the most appropriate dose of FA is still under debate. We investigated the effects of a higher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bortolus, Renata, Filippini, Francesca, Cipriani, Sonia, Trevisanuto, Daniele, Cavallin, Francesco, Zanconato, Giovanni, Somigliana, Edgardo, Cesari, Elena, Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo, Parazzini, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34959975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13124422
_version_ 1784621675782864896
author Bortolus, Renata
Filippini, Francesca
Cipriani, Sonia
Trevisanuto, Daniele
Cavallin, Francesco
Zanconato, Giovanni
Somigliana, Edgardo
Cesari, Elena
Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
Parazzini, Fabio
author_facet Bortolus, Renata
Filippini, Francesca
Cipriani, Sonia
Trevisanuto, Daniele
Cavallin, Francesco
Zanconato, Giovanni
Somigliana, Edgardo
Cesari, Elena
Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
Parazzini, Fabio
author_sort Bortolus, Renata
collection PubMed
description Folic acid (FA) supplementation prevents neural tube defects (NTDs), but the effects on other reproductive outcomes are unclear. While common recommendation is 0.4 mg/day in addition to regular nutrition, the most appropriate dose of FA is still under debate. We investigated the effects of a higher dose of periconception FA on reducing adverse reproductive outcomes. In this multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), 1060 women (aged 18–44 years and planning a pregnancy) were randomly assigned to receive 4.0 mg or 0.4 mg of FA daily. The primary outcome was the occurrence of congenital malformations (CMs). A composite outcome including one or more adverse pregnancy outcomes was also evaluated. A total of 431 women had a natural conception within 1 year. The primary outcome occurred in 8/227 (3.5%) women receiving 4.0 mg FA and 9/204 (4.4%) women receiving 0.4 mg FA (RR 0.80; 95%CI 0.31 to 2.03). The composite outcome occurred in 43/227 (18.9%) women receiving 4.0 mg FA and 75/204 (36.8%) women receiving 0.4 mg FA (RR 0.51; 95%CI 0.40 to 0.68). FA 4.0 mg supplementation was not associated with different occurrence of CMs, compared to FA 0.4 mg supplementation. However, FA 4.0 mg supplementation was associated with lower occurrence of other adverse pregnancy outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8704306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87043062021-12-25 Efficacy of 4.0 mg versus 0.4 mg Folic Acid Supplementation on the Reproductive Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial Bortolus, Renata Filippini, Francesca Cipriani, Sonia Trevisanuto, Daniele Cavallin, Francesco Zanconato, Giovanni Somigliana, Edgardo Cesari, Elena Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo Parazzini, Fabio Nutrients Article Folic acid (FA) supplementation prevents neural tube defects (NTDs), but the effects on other reproductive outcomes are unclear. While common recommendation is 0.4 mg/day in addition to regular nutrition, the most appropriate dose of FA is still under debate. We investigated the effects of a higher dose of periconception FA on reducing adverse reproductive outcomes. In this multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), 1060 women (aged 18–44 years and planning a pregnancy) were randomly assigned to receive 4.0 mg or 0.4 mg of FA daily. The primary outcome was the occurrence of congenital malformations (CMs). A composite outcome including one or more adverse pregnancy outcomes was also evaluated. A total of 431 women had a natural conception within 1 year. The primary outcome occurred in 8/227 (3.5%) women receiving 4.0 mg FA and 9/204 (4.4%) women receiving 0.4 mg FA (RR 0.80; 95%CI 0.31 to 2.03). The composite outcome occurred in 43/227 (18.9%) women receiving 4.0 mg FA and 75/204 (36.8%) women receiving 0.4 mg FA (RR 0.51; 95%CI 0.40 to 0.68). FA 4.0 mg supplementation was not associated with different occurrence of CMs, compared to FA 0.4 mg supplementation. However, FA 4.0 mg supplementation was associated with lower occurrence of other adverse pregnancy outcomes. MDPI 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8704306/ /pubmed/34959975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13124422 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bortolus, Renata
Filippini, Francesca
Cipriani, Sonia
Trevisanuto, Daniele
Cavallin, Francesco
Zanconato, Giovanni
Somigliana, Edgardo
Cesari, Elena
Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
Parazzini, Fabio
Efficacy of 4.0 mg versus 0.4 mg Folic Acid Supplementation on the Reproductive Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Efficacy of 4.0 mg versus 0.4 mg Folic Acid Supplementation on the Reproductive Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Efficacy of 4.0 mg versus 0.4 mg Folic Acid Supplementation on the Reproductive Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of 4.0 mg versus 0.4 mg Folic Acid Supplementation on the Reproductive Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of 4.0 mg versus 0.4 mg Folic Acid Supplementation on the Reproductive Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Efficacy of 4.0 mg versus 0.4 mg Folic Acid Supplementation on the Reproductive Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort efficacy of 4.0 mg versus 0.4 mg folic acid supplementation on the reproductive outcomes: a randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34959975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13124422
work_keys_str_mv AT bortolusrenata efficacyof40mgversus04mgfolicacidsupplementationonthereproductiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT filippinifrancesca efficacyof40mgversus04mgfolicacidsupplementationonthereproductiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ciprianisonia efficacyof40mgversus04mgfolicacidsupplementationonthereproductiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT trevisanutodaniele efficacyof40mgversus04mgfolicacidsupplementationonthereproductiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cavallinfrancesco efficacyof40mgversus04mgfolicacidsupplementationonthereproductiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zanconatogiovanni efficacyof40mgversus04mgfolicacidsupplementationonthereproductiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT somiglianaedgardo efficacyof40mgversus04mgfolicacidsupplementationonthereproductiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cesarielena efficacyof40mgversus04mgfolicacidsupplementationonthereproductiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mastroiacovopierpaolo efficacyof40mgversus04mgfolicacidsupplementationonthereproductiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parazzinifabio efficacyof40mgversus04mgfolicacidsupplementationonthereproductiveoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrial