Cargando…

Hyperostosis in Combination With Low Skull Density Ratio: A Potential Contraindication for Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy

Since its approval in treating a number of movement disorders, magnetic resonance imaging–guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) has been adopted rapidly as one of the standard treatment modalities internationally. However, the efficiency of the energy delivered by the ultrasonic waves is largely determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuen, Jason, Miller, Kai J., Klassen, Bryan T., Lehman, Vance T., Lee, Kendall H., Kaufmann, Timothy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.11.007
_version_ 1784621707996168192
author Yuen, Jason
Miller, Kai J.
Klassen, Bryan T.
Lehman, Vance T.
Lee, Kendall H.
Kaufmann, Timothy J.
author_facet Yuen, Jason
Miller, Kai J.
Klassen, Bryan T.
Lehman, Vance T.
Lee, Kendall H.
Kaufmann, Timothy J.
author_sort Yuen, Jason
collection PubMed
description Since its approval in treating a number of movement disorders, magnetic resonance imaging–guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) has been adopted rapidly as one of the standard treatment modalities internationally. However, the efficiency of the energy delivered by the ultrasonic waves is largely determined by the highly variable bone morphology and density characteristics of the skull. One of the widely accepted indices used to facilitate patient selection is the skull density ratio (SDR). Earlier literature suggested that an SDR of less than 0.4 would be unfavorable for MRgFUS treatment. Some prior studies have excluded patients with hyperostosis. However, there is little published data regarding the impact of other skull features such as hyperostosis on treatment success. We present the case of a 66-year-old man with medically refractory essential tremor who had an SDR of 0.38 and extensive hyperostosis frontalis interna and underwent attempted MRgFUS thalamotomy treatment. However, intraoperatively the treatment was unsuccessful in generating sufficiently elevated temperature to create a lesion of the usual desired volume, and as expected, there was minimal clinical improvement. For comparison, we also summarize a case series of 4 other patients with an SDR of less than 0.4 who had successful outcomes. We believe that SDR should not be used as the only means of selecting patients for MRgFUS. Instead, important factors such as hyperostosis should be taken into consideration for patient selection and pretreatment counseling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8704442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87044422021-12-30 Hyperostosis in Combination With Low Skull Density Ratio: A Potential Contraindication for Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy Yuen, Jason Miller, Kai J. Klassen, Bryan T. Lehman, Vance T. Lee, Kendall H. Kaufmann, Timothy J. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Brief Report Since its approval in treating a number of movement disorders, magnetic resonance imaging–guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) has been adopted rapidly as one of the standard treatment modalities internationally. However, the efficiency of the energy delivered by the ultrasonic waves is largely determined by the highly variable bone morphology and density characteristics of the skull. One of the widely accepted indices used to facilitate patient selection is the skull density ratio (SDR). Earlier literature suggested that an SDR of less than 0.4 would be unfavorable for MRgFUS treatment. Some prior studies have excluded patients with hyperostosis. However, there is little published data regarding the impact of other skull features such as hyperostosis on treatment success. We present the case of a 66-year-old man with medically refractory essential tremor who had an SDR of 0.38 and extensive hyperostosis frontalis interna and underwent attempted MRgFUS thalamotomy treatment. However, intraoperatively the treatment was unsuccessful in generating sufficiently elevated temperature to create a lesion of the usual desired volume, and as expected, there was minimal clinical improvement. For comparison, we also summarize a case series of 4 other patients with an SDR of less than 0.4 who had successful outcomes. We believe that SDR should not be used as the only means of selecting patients for MRgFUS. Instead, important factors such as hyperostosis should be taken into consideration for patient selection and pretreatment counseling. Elsevier 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8704442/ /pubmed/34977470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.11.007 Text en © 2021 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Yuen, Jason
Miller, Kai J.
Klassen, Bryan T.
Lehman, Vance T.
Lee, Kendall H.
Kaufmann, Timothy J.
Hyperostosis in Combination With Low Skull Density Ratio: A Potential Contraindication for Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy
title Hyperostosis in Combination With Low Skull Density Ratio: A Potential Contraindication for Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy
title_full Hyperostosis in Combination With Low Skull Density Ratio: A Potential Contraindication for Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy
title_fullStr Hyperostosis in Combination With Low Skull Density Ratio: A Potential Contraindication for Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy
title_full_unstemmed Hyperostosis in Combination With Low Skull Density Ratio: A Potential Contraindication for Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy
title_short Hyperostosis in Combination With Low Skull Density Ratio: A Potential Contraindication for Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy
title_sort hyperostosis in combination with low skull density ratio: a potential contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging–guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.11.007
work_keys_str_mv AT yuenjason hyperostosisincombinationwithlowskulldensityratioapotentialcontraindicationformagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundthalamotomy
AT millerkaij hyperostosisincombinationwithlowskulldensityratioapotentialcontraindicationformagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundthalamotomy
AT klassenbryant hyperostosisincombinationwithlowskulldensityratioapotentialcontraindicationformagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundthalamotomy
AT lehmanvancet hyperostosisincombinationwithlowskulldensityratioapotentialcontraindicationformagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundthalamotomy
AT leekendallh hyperostosisincombinationwithlowskulldensityratioapotentialcontraindicationformagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundthalamotomy
AT kaufmanntimothyj hyperostosisincombinationwithlowskulldensityratioapotentialcontraindicationformagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundthalamotomy