Cargando…

The Role of US in Depicting Axillary Metastasis in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of US in depicting axillary nodal disease in high-risk patients with and without pathogenic mutations. Methods: The retrospective study included consecutive high-risk breast cancer (BC) patients who underwent a multigene testing panel for heredi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pintican, Roxana, Duma, Magdalena Maria, Szep, Madalina, Feier, Diana, Eniu, Dan, Goidescu, Iulian, Chiorean, Angelica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121379
_version_ 1784621726019092480
author Pintican, Roxana
Duma, Magdalena Maria
Szep, Madalina
Feier, Diana
Eniu, Dan
Goidescu, Iulian
Chiorean, Angelica
author_facet Pintican, Roxana
Duma, Magdalena Maria
Szep, Madalina
Feier, Diana
Eniu, Dan
Goidescu, Iulian
Chiorean, Angelica
author_sort Pintican, Roxana
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of US in depicting axillary nodal disease in high-risk patients with and without pathogenic mutations. Methods: The retrospective study included consecutive high-risk breast cancer (BC) patients who underwent a multigene testing panel for hereditary cancers, pre-operative axillary US and breast/axillary surgery. The group was divided into patients with pathogenic mutations (PM group) and patients without PM. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism by applying Chi-square and Fisher exact tests, with a reference p-value < 0.05 and a CI of 95%. Results: Out of 190 patients with BC, 96 (51%) were negative and 94 (49%) were positive for PM as follows: 28 (25.5%) BRCA1, 16 (17%) BRCA2, 15 (16%) CHECK2, 14 (14%) RAD Group, 7 (7%) PALB, 6 (6%) NBN, 3 (3%) TP53 and ATM and 2 (2%) BARD1. US was positive in 88 of the patients, 36 with PM and 52 without PM. US and surgery (≥N1 stage) were both positive in 31 (62%) of PM patients and 44 (88%) of patients without genetic changes. There were 19 (61%) false negative US examinations in the PM group and 6 (13%) in the group without genetic changes, respectively. If the US is positive, there is a 2.6 times greater risk of positive nodes in PM patients (p-value < 0.000, 95% CI = 4.2–37.9), and a 6.2 times greater risk of positive nodes in patients without genetic changes (p-value < 0.000, 95%CI = 8.4–37.4). In the PM group, US compared to surgery reached a sensitivity = 62, with PPV = 86 and NPV = 67. In the BRCA1/2 subgroup, there is 2.5 greater times risk of nodal disease if the US is positive (p-value = 0.001, 95%CI = 2.6–76). In patients without PM, US compared to surgery reached a sensitivity = 88, PPV = 84 and NPV = 86. Conclusion: US is more sensitive in depicting axillary nodal disease in high-risk patients without PM compared to PM patients. Furthermore, there are more false negative US examinations in PM patients, compared to surgery patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8704519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87045192021-12-25 The Role of US in Depicting Axillary Metastasis in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients Pintican, Roxana Duma, Magdalena Maria Szep, Madalina Feier, Diana Eniu, Dan Goidescu, Iulian Chiorean, Angelica J Pers Med Article Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of US in depicting axillary nodal disease in high-risk patients with and without pathogenic mutations. Methods: The retrospective study included consecutive high-risk breast cancer (BC) patients who underwent a multigene testing panel for hereditary cancers, pre-operative axillary US and breast/axillary surgery. The group was divided into patients with pathogenic mutations (PM group) and patients without PM. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism by applying Chi-square and Fisher exact tests, with a reference p-value < 0.05 and a CI of 95%. Results: Out of 190 patients with BC, 96 (51%) were negative and 94 (49%) were positive for PM as follows: 28 (25.5%) BRCA1, 16 (17%) BRCA2, 15 (16%) CHECK2, 14 (14%) RAD Group, 7 (7%) PALB, 6 (6%) NBN, 3 (3%) TP53 and ATM and 2 (2%) BARD1. US was positive in 88 of the patients, 36 with PM and 52 without PM. US and surgery (≥N1 stage) were both positive in 31 (62%) of PM patients and 44 (88%) of patients without genetic changes. There were 19 (61%) false negative US examinations in the PM group and 6 (13%) in the group without genetic changes, respectively. If the US is positive, there is a 2.6 times greater risk of positive nodes in PM patients (p-value < 0.000, 95% CI = 4.2–37.9), and a 6.2 times greater risk of positive nodes in patients without genetic changes (p-value < 0.000, 95%CI = 8.4–37.4). In the PM group, US compared to surgery reached a sensitivity = 62, with PPV = 86 and NPV = 67. In the BRCA1/2 subgroup, there is 2.5 greater times risk of nodal disease if the US is positive (p-value = 0.001, 95%CI = 2.6–76). In patients without PM, US compared to surgery reached a sensitivity = 88, PPV = 84 and NPV = 86. Conclusion: US is more sensitive in depicting axillary nodal disease in high-risk patients without PM compared to PM patients. Furthermore, there are more false negative US examinations in PM patients, compared to surgery patients. MDPI 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8704519/ /pubmed/34945851 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121379 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pintican, Roxana
Duma, Magdalena Maria
Szep, Madalina
Feier, Diana
Eniu, Dan
Goidescu, Iulian
Chiorean, Angelica
The Role of US in Depicting Axillary Metastasis in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients
title The Role of US in Depicting Axillary Metastasis in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients
title_full The Role of US in Depicting Axillary Metastasis in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients
title_fullStr The Role of US in Depicting Axillary Metastasis in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed The Role of US in Depicting Axillary Metastasis in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients
title_short The Role of US in Depicting Axillary Metastasis in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients
title_sort role of us in depicting axillary metastasis in high-risk breast cancer patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11121379
work_keys_str_mv AT pinticanroxana theroleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT dumamagdalenamaria theroleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT szepmadalina theroleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT feierdiana theroleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT eniudan theroleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT goidescuiulian theroleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT chioreanangelica theroleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT pinticanroxana roleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT dumamagdalenamaria roleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT szepmadalina roleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT feierdiana roleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT eniudan roleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT goidescuiulian roleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients
AT chioreanangelica roleofusindepictingaxillarymetastasisinhighriskbreastcancerpatients