Cargando…

Evaluation of Stress Distribution during Insertion of Tapered Dental Implants in Various Osteotomy Techniques: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study

Conventional osteotomy techniques can, in some cases, induce higher stress on bone during implant insertion as a result of higher torque. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the stress exerted on the underlying osseous tissues during the insertion of a tapered implant using diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahendra, Jaideep, Chand, Yemineni Bhavan, Mahendra, Little, Fageeh, Hytham N., Fageeh, Hammam Ibrahim, Ibraheem, Wael, Alzahrani, Khaled M., Alqahtani, Nasser M., Alahmari, Nasser Mesfer, Almagbol, Mohammad, Robaian, Ali, Jigeesh, Nasina, Varadarajan, Saranya, Balaji, Thodur Madapusi, Patil, Shankargouda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247547
_version_ 1784621761717862400
author Mahendra, Jaideep
Chand, Yemineni Bhavan
Mahendra, Little
Fageeh, Hytham N.
Fageeh, Hammam Ibrahim
Ibraheem, Wael
Alzahrani, Khaled M.
Alqahtani, Nasser M.
Alahmari, Nasser Mesfer
Almagbol, Mohammad
Robaian, Ali
Jigeesh, Nasina
Varadarajan, Saranya
Balaji, Thodur Madapusi
Patil, Shankargouda
author_facet Mahendra, Jaideep
Chand, Yemineni Bhavan
Mahendra, Little
Fageeh, Hytham N.
Fageeh, Hammam Ibrahim
Ibraheem, Wael
Alzahrani, Khaled M.
Alqahtani, Nasser M.
Alahmari, Nasser Mesfer
Almagbol, Mohammad
Robaian, Ali
Jigeesh, Nasina
Varadarajan, Saranya
Balaji, Thodur Madapusi
Patil, Shankargouda
author_sort Mahendra, Jaideep
collection PubMed
description Conventional osteotomy techniques can, in some cases, induce higher stress on bone during implant insertion as a result of higher torque. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the stress exerted on the underlying osseous tissues during the insertion of a tapered implant using different osteotomy techniques through a dynamic finite element analysis which has been widely applied to study biomedical problems through computer-aided software. In three different types of osteotomy techniques, namely conventional (B1), bone tap (B2), and countersink (B3), five models and implants designed per technique were prepared, implant insertion was simulated, and stress exerted by the implant during each was evaluated. Comparison of stress scores on the cortical and cancellous bone at different time points and time intervals from initiation of insertion to the final placement of the implant was made. There was a highly statistically significant difference between B1 and B2 (p = 0.0001) and B2 and B3 (p = 0.0001) groups. In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in the stress scores between B1 and B3 (p = 0.3080) groups at all time points of implant placement. Overall, a highly significant difference was observed between the stresses exerted in each technique. Within the limitations of our study, bone tap significantly exerted lesser stresses on the entire bone than conventional and countersink type of osteotomy procedures. Considering the stress distribution at the crestal region, the countersink showed lower values in comparison to others.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8704667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87046672021-12-25 Evaluation of Stress Distribution during Insertion of Tapered Dental Implants in Various Osteotomy Techniques: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study Mahendra, Jaideep Chand, Yemineni Bhavan Mahendra, Little Fageeh, Hytham N. Fageeh, Hammam Ibrahim Ibraheem, Wael Alzahrani, Khaled M. Alqahtani, Nasser M. Alahmari, Nasser Mesfer Almagbol, Mohammad Robaian, Ali Jigeesh, Nasina Varadarajan, Saranya Balaji, Thodur Madapusi Patil, Shankargouda Materials (Basel) Article Conventional osteotomy techniques can, in some cases, induce higher stress on bone during implant insertion as a result of higher torque. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the stress exerted on the underlying osseous tissues during the insertion of a tapered implant using different osteotomy techniques through a dynamic finite element analysis which has been widely applied to study biomedical problems through computer-aided software. In three different types of osteotomy techniques, namely conventional (B1), bone tap (B2), and countersink (B3), five models and implants designed per technique were prepared, implant insertion was simulated, and stress exerted by the implant during each was evaluated. Comparison of stress scores on the cortical and cancellous bone at different time points and time intervals from initiation of insertion to the final placement of the implant was made. There was a highly statistically significant difference between B1 and B2 (p = 0.0001) and B2 and B3 (p = 0.0001) groups. In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in the stress scores between B1 and B3 (p = 0.3080) groups at all time points of implant placement. Overall, a highly significant difference was observed between the stresses exerted in each technique. Within the limitations of our study, bone tap significantly exerted lesser stresses on the entire bone than conventional and countersink type of osteotomy procedures. Considering the stress distribution at the crestal region, the countersink showed lower values in comparison to others. MDPI 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8704667/ /pubmed/34947142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247547 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mahendra, Jaideep
Chand, Yemineni Bhavan
Mahendra, Little
Fageeh, Hytham N.
Fageeh, Hammam Ibrahim
Ibraheem, Wael
Alzahrani, Khaled M.
Alqahtani, Nasser M.
Alahmari, Nasser Mesfer
Almagbol, Mohammad
Robaian, Ali
Jigeesh, Nasina
Varadarajan, Saranya
Balaji, Thodur Madapusi
Patil, Shankargouda
Evaluation of Stress Distribution during Insertion of Tapered Dental Implants in Various Osteotomy Techniques: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title Evaluation of Stress Distribution during Insertion of Tapered Dental Implants in Various Osteotomy Techniques: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title_full Evaluation of Stress Distribution during Insertion of Tapered Dental Implants in Various Osteotomy Techniques: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Stress Distribution during Insertion of Tapered Dental Implants in Various Osteotomy Techniques: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Stress Distribution during Insertion of Tapered Dental Implants in Various Osteotomy Techniques: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title_short Evaluation of Stress Distribution during Insertion of Tapered Dental Implants in Various Osteotomy Techniques: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title_sort evaluation of stress distribution during insertion of tapered dental implants in various osteotomy techniques: three-dimensional finite element study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247547
work_keys_str_mv AT mahendrajaideep evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT chandyeminenibhavan evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT mahendralittle evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT fageehhythamn evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT fageehhammamibrahim evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT ibraheemwael evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT alzahranikhaledm evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT alqahtaninasserm evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT alahmarinassermesfer evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT almagbolmohammad evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT robaianali evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT jigeeshnasina evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT varadarajansaranya evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT balajithodurmadapusi evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT patilshankargouda evaluationofstressdistributionduringinsertionoftapereddentalimplantsinvariousosteotomytechniquesthreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy