Cargando…

Use of Intramedullary Locking Nail for Displaced Intraarticular Fractures of the Calcaneus: What is the Evidence?

CATEGORY: Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: There is increasing interest on how to best manage displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures (DIACF). Intramedullary locking devices (ILDs) have recently been advocated since the technique adopts a minimally invasive approach which may minimise complications...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernasconi, Alessio, Iorio, Paolino, Ghani, Yaser, Argyropoulos, Miltiadis, Patel, Shelain, Welck, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704718/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00131
_version_ 1784621774225276928
author Bernasconi, Alessio
Iorio, Paolino
Ghani, Yaser
Argyropoulos, Miltiadis
Patel, Shelain
Welck, Matthew J.
author_facet Bernasconi, Alessio
Iorio, Paolino
Ghani, Yaser
Argyropoulos, Miltiadis
Patel, Shelain
Welck, Matthew J.
author_sort Bernasconi, Alessio
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: There is increasing interest on how to best manage displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures (DIACF). Intramedullary locking devices (ILDs) have recently been advocated since the technique adopts a minimally invasive approach which may minimise complications and therefore improve outcomes. We reviewed the literature of commercially available devices to identify their characteristics, efficacy and safety. METHODS: Medline, Scopus and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies reporting use of ILDs for treating DIACF. A PRISMA checklist was used to sort eligible studies. Technical notes and biomechanical studies were first reviewed. Cohort studies were then reviewed for demographics, surgical technique, postoperative protocol, clinical and radiographic scores, complications and reoperations. The modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) was used to assess the quality of studies. RESULTS: Thirteen studies investigated two devices (Calcanail; C-Nail). Four technical notes described how to use these devices and three biomechanical studies proved they offered adequate primary stability, stiffness, interfragmentary motion and load to failure. Seven clinical studies (302 feet, 289 patients) demonstrated satisfactory clinical (AOFAS, VAS) and radiographic (Bohler’s angle, Gissane angle, Goldzak index, posterior facet step-off) outcome at 16-months average follow-up. Metalware irritation (up to 20%) and temporary nerve entrapment symptoms (up to 30%) were the most common complications; soft tissue issues were reported in 3-5% of cases. Conversion to subtalar fusion was necessary in 4-6% of cases. Four (57%) studies were authored by implant designers and in 5 (71%) relevant conflict of interest were disclosed. Mean CMS was 61 (moderate quality). CONCLUSION: Treating DIAFCs with ILDs leads to satisfactory clinical outcomes at short term follow-up, enabling restoration of calcaneal height and improved subtalar joint congruency. Metalware irritation and temporary nerve entrapment symptoms are common complications although wound complications including infection and wound breakdown are less frequent than after open lateral approaches. The quality of evidence provided so far is only moderate and biased by potential conflict of interest, raising concerns about the generalisability of results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8704718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87047182022-01-28 Use of Intramedullary Locking Nail for Displaced Intraarticular Fractures of the Calcaneus: What is the Evidence? Bernasconi, Alessio Iorio, Paolino Ghani, Yaser Argyropoulos, Miltiadis Patel, Shelain Welck, Matthew J. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: There is increasing interest on how to best manage displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures (DIACF). Intramedullary locking devices (ILDs) have recently been advocated since the technique adopts a minimally invasive approach which may minimise complications and therefore improve outcomes. We reviewed the literature of commercially available devices to identify their characteristics, efficacy and safety. METHODS: Medline, Scopus and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies reporting use of ILDs for treating DIACF. A PRISMA checklist was used to sort eligible studies. Technical notes and biomechanical studies were first reviewed. Cohort studies were then reviewed for demographics, surgical technique, postoperative protocol, clinical and radiographic scores, complications and reoperations. The modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) was used to assess the quality of studies. RESULTS: Thirteen studies investigated two devices (Calcanail; C-Nail). Four technical notes described how to use these devices and three biomechanical studies proved they offered adequate primary stability, stiffness, interfragmentary motion and load to failure. Seven clinical studies (302 feet, 289 patients) demonstrated satisfactory clinical (AOFAS, VAS) and radiographic (Bohler’s angle, Gissane angle, Goldzak index, posterior facet step-off) outcome at 16-months average follow-up. Metalware irritation (up to 20%) and temporary nerve entrapment symptoms (up to 30%) were the most common complications; soft tissue issues were reported in 3-5% of cases. Conversion to subtalar fusion was necessary in 4-6% of cases. Four (57%) studies were authored by implant designers and in 5 (71%) relevant conflict of interest were disclosed. Mean CMS was 61 (moderate quality). CONCLUSION: Treating DIAFCs with ILDs leads to satisfactory clinical outcomes at short term follow-up, enabling restoration of calcaneal height and improved subtalar joint congruency. Metalware irritation and temporary nerve entrapment symptoms are common complications although wound complications including infection and wound breakdown are less frequent than after open lateral approaches. The quality of evidence provided so far is only moderate and biased by potential conflict of interest, raising concerns about the generalisability of results. SAGE Publications 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8704718/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00131 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Bernasconi, Alessio
Iorio, Paolino
Ghani, Yaser
Argyropoulos, Miltiadis
Patel, Shelain
Welck, Matthew J.
Use of Intramedullary Locking Nail for Displaced Intraarticular Fractures of the Calcaneus: What is the Evidence?
title Use of Intramedullary Locking Nail for Displaced Intraarticular Fractures of the Calcaneus: What is the Evidence?
title_full Use of Intramedullary Locking Nail for Displaced Intraarticular Fractures of the Calcaneus: What is the Evidence?
title_fullStr Use of Intramedullary Locking Nail for Displaced Intraarticular Fractures of the Calcaneus: What is the Evidence?
title_full_unstemmed Use of Intramedullary Locking Nail for Displaced Intraarticular Fractures of the Calcaneus: What is the Evidence?
title_short Use of Intramedullary Locking Nail for Displaced Intraarticular Fractures of the Calcaneus: What is the Evidence?
title_sort use of intramedullary locking nail for displaced intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus: what is the evidence?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8704718/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00131
work_keys_str_mv AT bernasconialessio useofintramedullarylockingnailfordisplacedintraarticularfracturesofthecalcaneuswhatistheevidence
AT ioriopaolino useofintramedullarylockingnailfordisplacedintraarticularfracturesofthecalcaneuswhatistheevidence
AT ghaniyaser useofintramedullarylockingnailfordisplacedintraarticularfracturesofthecalcaneuswhatistheevidence
AT argyropoulosmiltiadis useofintramedullarylockingnailfordisplacedintraarticularfracturesofthecalcaneuswhatistheevidence
AT patelshelain useofintramedullarylockingnailfordisplacedintraarticularfracturesofthecalcaneuswhatistheevidence
AT welckmatthewj useofintramedullarylockingnailfordisplacedintraarticularfracturesofthecalcaneuswhatistheevidence