Cargando…

Intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus

BACKGROUND: Intravenous corticosteroid is the mainstay for managing acute severe ulcerative colitis, but one-third of patients do not respond to intravenous corticosteroid. Tacrolimus, a salvage therapy before colectomy, is usually orally administered, though its bioavailability is low compared intr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shimizu, Hiromichi, Fujii, Toshimitsu, Kinoshita, Kenji, Kawamoto, Ami, Hibiya, Shuji, Takenaka, Kento, Saito, Eiko, Nagahori, Masakazu, Ohtsuka, Kazuo, Watanabe, Mamoru, Okamoto, Ryuichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02043-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Intravenous corticosteroid is the mainstay for managing acute severe ulcerative colitis, but one-third of patients do not respond to intravenous corticosteroid. Tacrolimus, a salvage therapy before colectomy, is usually orally administered, though its bioavailability is low compared intravenous administration. The efficacy of intravenous tacrolimus has not been widely studied. AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous tacrolimus for the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Eighty-seven hospitalized acute severe ulcerative colitis patients were enrolled for a prospective cohort study between 2009 and 2017. Sixty-five patients received intravenous tacrolimus and 22 received oral tacrolimus. The primary outcome was the achievement of clinical remission within 2 weeks. Relapse and colectomy incidence and adverse events were assessed at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Response rates of both treatments exceeded 50% but were not significantly different. The remission rate was higher in intravenous tacrolimus compared with oral tacrolimus. At 24 weeks, oral and intravenous tacrolimus showed similar relapse-free survival rates; however, colectomy-free survival rates were higher in intravenous tacrolimus compared with oral tacrolimus. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving intravenous tacrolimus achieved superior remission and colectomy-free survival rates compared with patients receiving oral tacrolimus. Safety was similar between the two treatments.