Cargando…
Intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus
BACKGROUND: Intravenous corticosteroid is the mainstay for managing acute severe ulcerative colitis, but one-third of patients do not respond to intravenous corticosteroid. Tacrolimus, a salvage therapy before colectomy, is usually orally administered, though its bioavailability is low compared intr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02043-6 |
_version_ | 1784621876593557504 |
---|---|
author | Shimizu, Hiromichi Fujii, Toshimitsu Kinoshita, Kenji Kawamoto, Ami Hibiya, Shuji Takenaka, Kento Saito, Eiko Nagahori, Masakazu Ohtsuka, Kazuo Watanabe, Mamoru Okamoto, Ryuichi |
author_facet | Shimizu, Hiromichi Fujii, Toshimitsu Kinoshita, Kenji Kawamoto, Ami Hibiya, Shuji Takenaka, Kento Saito, Eiko Nagahori, Masakazu Ohtsuka, Kazuo Watanabe, Mamoru Okamoto, Ryuichi |
author_sort | Shimizu, Hiromichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intravenous corticosteroid is the mainstay for managing acute severe ulcerative colitis, but one-third of patients do not respond to intravenous corticosteroid. Tacrolimus, a salvage therapy before colectomy, is usually orally administered, though its bioavailability is low compared intravenous administration. The efficacy of intravenous tacrolimus has not been widely studied. AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous tacrolimus for the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Eighty-seven hospitalized acute severe ulcerative colitis patients were enrolled for a prospective cohort study between 2009 and 2017. Sixty-five patients received intravenous tacrolimus and 22 received oral tacrolimus. The primary outcome was the achievement of clinical remission within 2 weeks. Relapse and colectomy incidence and adverse events were assessed at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Response rates of both treatments exceeded 50% but were not significantly different. The remission rate was higher in intravenous tacrolimus compared with oral tacrolimus. At 24 weeks, oral and intravenous tacrolimus showed similar relapse-free survival rates; however, colectomy-free survival rates were higher in intravenous tacrolimus compared with oral tacrolimus. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving intravenous tacrolimus achieved superior remission and colectomy-free survival rates compared with patients receiving oral tacrolimus. Safety was similar between the two treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8705155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87051552022-01-05 Intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus Shimizu, Hiromichi Fujii, Toshimitsu Kinoshita, Kenji Kawamoto, Ami Hibiya, Shuji Takenaka, Kento Saito, Eiko Nagahori, Masakazu Ohtsuka, Kazuo Watanabe, Mamoru Okamoto, Ryuichi BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: Intravenous corticosteroid is the mainstay for managing acute severe ulcerative colitis, but one-third of patients do not respond to intravenous corticosteroid. Tacrolimus, a salvage therapy before colectomy, is usually orally administered, though its bioavailability is low compared intravenous administration. The efficacy of intravenous tacrolimus has not been widely studied. AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous tacrolimus for the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Eighty-seven hospitalized acute severe ulcerative colitis patients were enrolled for a prospective cohort study between 2009 and 2017. Sixty-five patients received intravenous tacrolimus and 22 received oral tacrolimus. The primary outcome was the achievement of clinical remission within 2 weeks. Relapse and colectomy incidence and adverse events were assessed at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Response rates of both treatments exceeded 50% but were not significantly different. The remission rate was higher in intravenous tacrolimus compared with oral tacrolimus. At 24 weeks, oral and intravenous tacrolimus showed similar relapse-free survival rates; however, colectomy-free survival rates were higher in intravenous tacrolimus compared with oral tacrolimus. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving intravenous tacrolimus achieved superior remission and colectomy-free survival rates compared with patients receiving oral tacrolimus. Safety was similar between the two treatments. BioMed Central 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8705155/ /pubmed/34949172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02043-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Shimizu, Hiromichi Fujii, Toshimitsu Kinoshita, Kenji Kawamoto, Ami Hibiya, Shuji Takenaka, Kento Saito, Eiko Nagahori, Masakazu Ohtsuka, Kazuo Watanabe, Mamoru Okamoto, Ryuichi Intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus |
title | Intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus |
title_full | Intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus |
title_fullStr | Intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus |
title_full_unstemmed | Intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus |
title_short | Intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus |
title_sort | intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02043-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimizuhiromichi intravenoustacrolimusisasuperiorinductiontherapyforacutesevereulcerativecolitiscomparedtooraltacrolimus AT fujiitoshimitsu intravenoustacrolimusisasuperiorinductiontherapyforacutesevereulcerativecolitiscomparedtooraltacrolimus AT kinoshitakenji intravenoustacrolimusisasuperiorinductiontherapyforacutesevereulcerativecolitiscomparedtooraltacrolimus AT kawamotoami intravenoustacrolimusisasuperiorinductiontherapyforacutesevereulcerativecolitiscomparedtooraltacrolimus AT hibiyashuji intravenoustacrolimusisasuperiorinductiontherapyforacutesevereulcerativecolitiscomparedtooraltacrolimus AT takenakakento intravenoustacrolimusisasuperiorinductiontherapyforacutesevereulcerativecolitiscomparedtooraltacrolimus AT saitoeiko intravenoustacrolimusisasuperiorinductiontherapyforacutesevereulcerativecolitiscomparedtooraltacrolimus AT nagahorimasakazu intravenoustacrolimusisasuperiorinductiontherapyforacutesevereulcerativecolitiscomparedtooraltacrolimus AT ohtsukakazuo intravenoustacrolimusisasuperiorinductiontherapyforacutesevereulcerativecolitiscomparedtooraltacrolimus AT watanabemamoru intravenoustacrolimusisasuperiorinductiontherapyforacutesevereulcerativecolitiscomparedtooraltacrolimus AT okamotoryuichi intravenoustacrolimusisasuperiorinductiontherapyforacutesevereulcerativecolitiscomparedtooraltacrolimus |