Cargando…
The development of clinical guidelines in China: insights from a national survey
BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that the quality of clinical guidelines (CGs) in China is suboptimal. However, little is known about the methodology that CGs follow. We conducted a national survey of methods used by Chinese CG developers for CG development, adaptation, and updating. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00799-7 |
_version_ | 1784621876837875712 |
---|---|
author | Song, Yang Li, Jing Chen, Yaolong Guo, Ruixia Alonso-Coello, Pablo Zhang, Yuan |
author_facet | Song, Yang Li, Jing Chen, Yaolong Guo, Ruixia Alonso-Coello, Pablo Zhang, Yuan |
author_sort | Song, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that the quality of clinical guidelines (CGs) in China is suboptimal. However, little is known about the methodology that CGs follow. We conducted a national survey of methods used by Chinese CG developers for CG development, adaptation, and updating. METHODS: We used a previously piloted questionnaire based on methodologies of CG development, adaptation, and updating, which was distributed during September–November 2020 to 114 organizations identified from published Chinese CGs (searched 2017–2020), recommended by Chinese CG developers, and recommended by clinical discipline experts. RESULTS: We collected 48 completed questionnaires (42.1% response). Most organizations developed CGs based on scientific evidence (89.6%), existing CGs (75%), or expert experience and opinion (64.6%). Only a few organizations had a specific CG development division (6.3%), a CG monitoring plan (on clinicians 33.3%; on patients 18.8%), funding (33.3%), or a conflict-of-interest (COI) management policy (23.4%). Thirty (62.5%) organizations reported using a CG development methodology handbook, from international organizations (14/30, 46.7%), methodology or evaluation resources (3/30, 10.0%), expert experience and opinion (3/30, 10.0%), or in-house handbooks (3/30, 10.0%). One organization followed a published adaptation methodology. Thirty-eight organizations (88.4%) reported de novo CG development: 21 (55.3%) formed a CG working group, and 29 (76.3%) evaluated the quality of evidence (21 [72.4%] using a methodological tool). Nineteen organizations (52.8%) reported CG adaptation: three (31.6%) had an adaptation working group, and 12 (63.2%) evaluated the quality of source CGs (2 (16.7%) using the AGREE II instrument). Thirty-three organizations (68.8%) updated their CGs, seven (17.5%) using a formal updating process. CONCLUSIONS: Our study describes how CGs are developed in a middle-income country like China. To ensure better healthcare, there is still an important need for improvement in the development, adaptation, and updating of CG in China. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00799-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8705156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87051562022-01-05 The development of clinical guidelines in China: insights from a national survey Song, Yang Li, Jing Chen, Yaolong Guo, Ruixia Alonso-Coello, Pablo Zhang, Yuan Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that the quality of clinical guidelines (CGs) in China is suboptimal. However, little is known about the methodology that CGs follow. We conducted a national survey of methods used by Chinese CG developers for CG development, adaptation, and updating. METHODS: We used a previously piloted questionnaire based on methodologies of CG development, adaptation, and updating, which was distributed during September–November 2020 to 114 organizations identified from published Chinese CGs (searched 2017–2020), recommended by Chinese CG developers, and recommended by clinical discipline experts. RESULTS: We collected 48 completed questionnaires (42.1% response). Most organizations developed CGs based on scientific evidence (89.6%), existing CGs (75%), or expert experience and opinion (64.6%). Only a few organizations had a specific CG development division (6.3%), a CG monitoring plan (on clinicians 33.3%; on patients 18.8%), funding (33.3%), or a conflict-of-interest (COI) management policy (23.4%). Thirty (62.5%) organizations reported using a CG development methodology handbook, from international organizations (14/30, 46.7%), methodology or evaluation resources (3/30, 10.0%), expert experience and opinion (3/30, 10.0%), or in-house handbooks (3/30, 10.0%). One organization followed a published adaptation methodology. Thirty-eight organizations (88.4%) reported de novo CG development: 21 (55.3%) formed a CG working group, and 29 (76.3%) evaluated the quality of evidence (21 [72.4%] using a methodological tool). Nineteen organizations (52.8%) reported CG adaptation: three (31.6%) had an adaptation working group, and 12 (63.2%) evaluated the quality of source CGs (2 (16.7%) using the AGREE II instrument). Thirty-three organizations (68.8%) updated their CGs, seven (17.5%) using a formal updating process. CONCLUSIONS: Our study describes how CGs are developed in a middle-income country like China. To ensure better healthcare, there is still an important need for improvement in the development, adaptation, and updating of CG in China. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00799-7. BioMed Central 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8705156/ /pubmed/34949195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00799-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Song, Yang Li, Jing Chen, Yaolong Guo, Ruixia Alonso-Coello, Pablo Zhang, Yuan The development of clinical guidelines in China: insights from a national survey |
title | The development of clinical guidelines in China: insights from a national survey |
title_full | The development of clinical guidelines in China: insights from a national survey |
title_fullStr | The development of clinical guidelines in China: insights from a national survey |
title_full_unstemmed | The development of clinical guidelines in China: insights from a national survey |
title_short | The development of clinical guidelines in China: insights from a national survey |
title_sort | development of clinical guidelines in china: insights from a national survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00799-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songyang thedevelopmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey AT lijing thedevelopmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey AT chenyaolong thedevelopmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey AT guoruixia thedevelopmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey AT alonsocoellopablo thedevelopmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey AT zhangyuan thedevelopmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey AT songyang developmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey AT lijing developmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey AT chenyaolong developmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey AT guoruixia developmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey AT alonsocoellopablo developmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey AT zhangyuan developmentofclinicalguidelinesinchinainsightsfromanationalsurvey |