Cargando…
The Impact of Age and Graft Type on Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis Fusion Success
CATEGORY: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Basic Sciences/Biologics; Hindfoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: A recent survey of 100 international foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons revealed that patient age greater than 60 years is not considered to be a significant risk factor for nonunion following foot and ankle...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705611/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00128 |
_version_ | 1784621989457035264 |
---|---|
author | Berlet, Gregory C. Baumhauer, Judith F. Glazebrook, Mark A. Younger, Alastair S. Fitch, David Quiton, Jovelyn Daniels, Timothy R. DiGiovanni, Christopher W. |
author_facet | Berlet, Gregory C. Baumhauer, Judith F. Glazebrook, Mark A. Younger, Alastair S. Fitch, David Quiton, Jovelyn Daniels, Timothy R. DiGiovanni, Christopher W. |
author_sort | Berlet, Gregory C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | CATEGORY: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Basic Sciences/Biologics; Hindfoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: A recent survey of 100 international foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons revealed that patient age greater than 60 years is not considered to be a significant risk factor for nonunion following foot and ankle arthrodesis. This finding was surprising as published basic science research shows that autologous bone graft used during fusion surgery may be less effective when harvested from older patients due to both diminished osteogenic potential and migration capacity of mesenchymal stem cells. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of patient age and graft type on fusion rates following hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis. METHODS: A Level 1 clinical trial was performed comparing fusion success in 397 hindfoot or ankle arthrodesis subjects (597 joints) supplemented with either autograft or an osteoinductive recombinant human protein derived growth factor (rhPDGF- BB/β-TCP) bone graft substitute. Fusion status was determined using computed tomography, with fusion defined as evidence of at least 50% osseous bridging. In this secondary analysis of that dataset, the odds of fusion success were compared for joints in autograft subjects older or younger than the following age thresholds: 55, 60, 65, 70 and 75 years. This analysis was then repeated for joints in rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP subjects. Finally, odds of fusion success were also compared for the autograft and rhPDGF-BB/β- TCP groups for subjects older than each threshold age. RESULTS: Joints in autograft subjects younger than 60 and 65 years exhibited over two times the odds of fusion as those in older subjects (60 years: OR 2.24, p=0.003; 65 years: OR 2.74, p<0.001). There was no significant difference for other intervals (55 years: OR 1.45, p=0.106; 70 years: 1.64, p=0.096; 75 years: OR 1.28, p=0.335). Interestingly, there was no significant difference for the rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP group at any threshold (55 years: OR 0.86, p=747; 60 years: OR 0.86, p=0.739; 65 years: 1.08, p=0.367; 70 years: 0.94, p=0.588; 75 years: OR 0.70, p=0.809). When odds of fusion were compared for the two groups in subjects older than each age threshold, rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP had approximately two times the odds of fusion success for all except 55 years (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that age is an identifiable and potentially concerning risk for nonunion following hindfoot or ankle arthrodesis. These findings are in contrast to the wider perception of the surgeon community, as documented in the published survey. Notably, patients over the age of 60 years who are supplemented with autograft have statistically lower odds of fusion compared to those younger, a difference not seen with the use of recombinant technology. This analysis suggests that use of rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP as an alternative bone healing adjunct may help mitigate the risk of nonunion when these procedures are performed in the elderly population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8705611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87056112022-01-28 The Impact of Age and Graft Type on Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis Fusion Success Berlet, Gregory C. Baumhauer, Judith F. Glazebrook, Mark A. Younger, Alastair S. Fitch, David Quiton, Jovelyn Daniels, Timothy R. DiGiovanni, Christopher W. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Basic Sciences/Biologics; Hindfoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: A recent survey of 100 international foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons revealed that patient age greater than 60 years is not considered to be a significant risk factor for nonunion following foot and ankle arthrodesis. This finding was surprising as published basic science research shows that autologous bone graft used during fusion surgery may be less effective when harvested from older patients due to both diminished osteogenic potential and migration capacity of mesenchymal stem cells. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of patient age and graft type on fusion rates following hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis. METHODS: A Level 1 clinical trial was performed comparing fusion success in 397 hindfoot or ankle arthrodesis subjects (597 joints) supplemented with either autograft or an osteoinductive recombinant human protein derived growth factor (rhPDGF- BB/β-TCP) bone graft substitute. Fusion status was determined using computed tomography, with fusion defined as evidence of at least 50% osseous bridging. In this secondary analysis of that dataset, the odds of fusion success were compared for joints in autograft subjects older or younger than the following age thresholds: 55, 60, 65, 70 and 75 years. This analysis was then repeated for joints in rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP subjects. Finally, odds of fusion success were also compared for the autograft and rhPDGF-BB/β- TCP groups for subjects older than each threshold age. RESULTS: Joints in autograft subjects younger than 60 and 65 years exhibited over two times the odds of fusion as those in older subjects (60 years: OR 2.24, p=0.003; 65 years: OR 2.74, p<0.001). There was no significant difference for other intervals (55 years: OR 1.45, p=0.106; 70 years: 1.64, p=0.096; 75 years: OR 1.28, p=0.335). Interestingly, there was no significant difference for the rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP group at any threshold (55 years: OR 0.86, p=747; 60 years: OR 0.86, p=0.739; 65 years: 1.08, p=0.367; 70 years: 0.94, p=0.588; 75 years: OR 0.70, p=0.809). When odds of fusion were compared for the two groups in subjects older than each age threshold, rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP had approximately two times the odds of fusion success for all except 55 years (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that age is an identifiable and potentially concerning risk for nonunion following hindfoot or ankle arthrodesis. These findings are in contrast to the wider perception of the surgeon community, as documented in the published survey. Notably, patients over the age of 60 years who are supplemented with autograft have statistically lower odds of fusion compared to those younger, a difference not seen with the use of recombinant technology. This analysis suggests that use of rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP as an alternative bone healing adjunct may help mitigate the risk of nonunion when these procedures are performed in the elderly population. SAGE Publications 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8705611/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00128 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Berlet, Gregory C. Baumhauer, Judith F. Glazebrook, Mark A. Younger, Alastair S. Fitch, David Quiton, Jovelyn Daniels, Timothy R. DiGiovanni, Christopher W. The Impact of Age and Graft Type on Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis Fusion Success |
title | The Impact of Age and Graft Type on Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis Fusion Success |
title_full | The Impact of Age and Graft Type on Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis Fusion Success |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Age and Graft Type on Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis Fusion Success |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Age and Graft Type on Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis Fusion Success |
title_short | The Impact of Age and Graft Type on Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis Fusion Success |
title_sort | impact of age and graft type on foot and ankle arthrodesis fusion success |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705611/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berletgregoryc theimpactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT baumhauerjudithf theimpactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT glazebrookmarka theimpactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT youngeralastairs theimpactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT fitchdavid theimpactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT quitonjovelyn theimpactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT danielstimothyr theimpactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT digiovannichristopherw theimpactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT berletgregoryc impactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT baumhauerjudithf impactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT glazebrookmarka impactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT youngeralastairs impactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT fitchdavid impactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT quitonjovelyn impactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT danielstimothyr impactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess AT digiovannichristopherw impactofageandgrafttypeonfootandanklearthrodesisfusionsuccess |