Cargando…

Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection

Introduction: Interoception, defined as the sense of the internal state of one’s body, helps motivate goal-directed behavior. Prior work has shown that methamphetamine (METH) use disorder is associated with altered interoception, and that this may contribute to risky behavior. As people with HIV (PW...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bischoff-Grethe, Amanda, Ellis, Ronald J., Tapert, Susan F., Paulus, Martin P., Grant, Igor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13122476
_version_ 1784622030416510976
author Bischoff-Grethe, Amanda
Ellis, Ronald J.
Tapert, Susan F.
Paulus, Martin P.
Grant, Igor
author_facet Bischoff-Grethe, Amanda
Ellis, Ronald J.
Tapert, Susan F.
Paulus, Martin P.
Grant, Igor
author_sort Bischoff-Grethe, Amanda
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Interoception, defined as the sense of the internal state of one’s body, helps motivate goal-directed behavior. Prior work has shown that methamphetamine (METH) use disorder is associated with altered interoception, and that this may contribute to risky behavior. As people with HIV (PWH) may also experience disrupted bodily sensations (e.g., neuropathy), an important question is whether PWH with a history of METH use disorder might exhibit greater impairment of interoceptive processing. Methods: Eighty-three participants stratified by HIV infection and a past history of methamphetamine use disorder experienced a soft touch paradigm that included slow brush strokes on the left forearm and palm during blood-oxygen level-dependent functional MRI acquisition. To assess differences in interoception and reward, voxelwise analyses were constrained to the insula, a hub for the evaluation of interoceptive cues, and the striatum, which is engaged in reward processing. Results: Overall, individuals with a history of METH use disorder had an attenuated neural response to pleasant touch in both the insula and striatum. Longer abstinence was associated with greater neural response to touch in the insula, suggesting some improvement in responsivity. However, only PWH with no METH use disorder history had lower brain activation in the insula relative to non-using seronegative controls. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that while METH use disorder history and HIV infection independently disrupt the neural processes associated with interoception, PWH with METH use disorder histories do not show significant differences relative to non-using seronegative controls. These findings suggest that the effects of HIV infection and past methamphetamine use might not be additive with respect to interoceptive processing impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8705776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87057762021-12-25 Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection Bischoff-Grethe, Amanda Ellis, Ronald J. Tapert, Susan F. Paulus, Martin P. Grant, Igor Viruses Article Introduction: Interoception, defined as the sense of the internal state of one’s body, helps motivate goal-directed behavior. Prior work has shown that methamphetamine (METH) use disorder is associated with altered interoception, and that this may contribute to risky behavior. As people with HIV (PWH) may also experience disrupted bodily sensations (e.g., neuropathy), an important question is whether PWH with a history of METH use disorder might exhibit greater impairment of interoceptive processing. Methods: Eighty-three participants stratified by HIV infection and a past history of methamphetamine use disorder experienced a soft touch paradigm that included slow brush strokes on the left forearm and palm during blood-oxygen level-dependent functional MRI acquisition. To assess differences in interoception and reward, voxelwise analyses were constrained to the insula, a hub for the evaluation of interoceptive cues, and the striatum, which is engaged in reward processing. Results: Overall, individuals with a history of METH use disorder had an attenuated neural response to pleasant touch in both the insula and striatum. Longer abstinence was associated with greater neural response to touch in the insula, suggesting some improvement in responsivity. However, only PWH with no METH use disorder history had lower brain activation in the insula relative to non-using seronegative controls. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that while METH use disorder history and HIV infection independently disrupt the neural processes associated with interoception, PWH with METH use disorder histories do not show significant differences relative to non-using seronegative controls. These findings suggest that the effects of HIV infection and past methamphetamine use might not be additive with respect to interoceptive processing impairment. MDPI 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8705776/ /pubmed/34960745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13122476 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bischoff-Grethe, Amanda
Ellis, Ronald J.
Tapert, Susan F.
Paulus, Martin P.
Grant, Igor
Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection
title Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection
title_full Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection
title_fullStr Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection
title_full_unstemmed Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection
title_short Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection
title_sort prior methamphetamine use disorder history does not impair interoceptive processing of soft touch in hiv infection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13122476
work_keys_str_mv AT bischoffgretheamanda priormethamphetamineusedisorderhistorydoesnotimpairinteroceptiveprocessingofsofttouchinhivinfection
AT ellisronaldj priormethamphetamineusedisorderhistorydoesnotimpairinteroceptiveprocessingofsofttouchinhivinfection
AT tapertsusanf priormethamphetamineusedisorderhistorydoesnotimpairinteroceptiveprocessingofsofttouchinhivinfection
AT paulusmartinp priormethamphetamineusedisorderhistorydoesnotimpairinteroceptiveprocessingofsofttouchinhivinfection
AT grantigor priormethamphetamineusedisorderhistorydoesnotimpairinteroceptiveprocessingofsofttouchinhivinfection
AT priormethamphetamineusedisorderhistorydoesnotimpairinteroceptiveprocessingofsofttouchinhivinfection