Cargando…
Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Background: ICDs and pacemakers for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are complex devices with different sensors and automatic algorithms implanted in patients with advanced cardiac diseases. Data on the perioperative management and outcome of CRT carriers undergoing surgery unrelated to the d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248346 |
_version_ | 1784622031633907712 |
---|---|
author | Niedermeier, Alexander Vitali-Serdoz, Laura Fischlein, Theodor Kirste, Wolfgang Buia, Veronica Walaschek, Janusch Rittger, Harald Bastian, Dirk |
author_facet | Niedermeier, Alexander Vitali-Serdoz, Laura Fischlein, Theodor Kirste, Wolfgang Buia, Veronica Walaschek, Janusch Rittger, Harald Bastian, Dirk |
author_sort | Niedermeier, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: ICDs and pacemakers for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are complex devices with different sensors and automatic algorithms implanted in patients with advanced cardiac diseases. Data on the perioperative management and outcome of CRT carriers undergoing surgery unrelated to the device are scarce. Methods: Data from 198 CRT device carriers (100 with active rate responsive sensor) were evaluated regarding perioperative adverse (device-related) events (A(D)E) and lead parameter changes. Results: Thirty-nine adverse observations were documented in 180 patients during preoperative interrogation, which were most often related to the left-ventricular lead and requiring intervention/reprogramming in 22 cases (12%). Anesthesia-related events occurred in 69 patients. There was no ADE for non-cardiac surgery and in pacemaker-dependent patients not programmed to an asynchronous pacing mode. Post-operative device interrogation showed significant lead parameter changes in 64/179 patients (36%) requiring reprogramming in 29 cases (16%). Conclusion: The left-ventricular pacing lead represents the most vulnerable system component. Comprehensive pre and post-interventional device interrogation is mandatory to ensure proper system function. The type of ICD function suspension has no impact on each patient’s outcome. Precautionary activity sensor deactivation is not required for non-cardiac interventions. Routine prophylactic device reprogramming to asynchronous pacing appears inessential. Most of the CRT pacemakers do not require surgery-related reprogramming. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8705781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87057812021-12-25 Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Niedermeier, Alexander Vitali-Serdoz, Laura Fischlein, Theodor Kirste, Wolfgang Buia, Veronica Walaschek, Janusch Rittger, Harald Bastian, Dirk Sensors (Basel) Article Background: ICDs and pacemakers for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are complex devices with different sensors and automatic algorithms implanted in patients with advanced cardiac diseases. Data on the perioperative management and outcome of CRT carriers undergoing surgery unrelated to the device are scarce. Methods: Data from 198 CRT device carriers (100 with active rate responsive sensor) were evaluated regarding perioperative adverse (device-related) events (A(D)E) and lead parameter changes. Results: Thirty-nine adverse observations were documented in 180 patients during preoperative interrogation, which were most often related to the left-ventricular lead and requiring intervention/reprogramming in 22 cases (12%). Anesthesia-related events occurred in 69 patients. There was no ADE for non-cardiac surgery and in pacemaker-dependent patients not programmed to an asynchronous pacing mode. Post-operative device interrogation showed significant lead parameter changes in 64/179 patients (36%) requiring reprogramming in 29 cases (16%). Conclusion: The left-ventricular pacing lead represents the most vulnerable system component. Comprehensive pre and post-interventional device interrogation is mandatory to ensure proper system function. The type of ICD function suspension has no impact on each patient’s outcome. Precautionary activity sensor deactivation is not required for non-cardiac interventions. Routine prophylactic device reprogramming to asynchronous pacing appears inessential. Most of the CRT pacemakers do not require surgery-related reprogramming. MDPI 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8705781/ /pubmed/34960440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248346 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Niedermeier, Alexander Vitali-Serdoz, Laura Fischlein, Theodor Kirste, Wolfgang Buia, Veronica Walaschek, Janusch Rittger, Harald Bastian, Dirk Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy |
title | Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy |
title_full | Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy |
title_fullStr | Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy |
title_short | Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy |
title_sort | perioperative sensor and algorithm programming in patients with implanted icds and pacemakers for cardiac resynchronization therapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niedermeieralexander perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT vitaliserdozlaura perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT fischleintheodor perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT kirstewolfgang perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT buiaveronica perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT walaschekjanusch perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT rittgerharald perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT bastiandirk perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy |