Cargando…

Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background: ICDs and pacemakers for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are complex devices with different sensors and automatic algorithms implanted in patients with advanced cardiac diseases. Data on the perioperative management and outcome of CRT carriers undergoing surgery unrelated to the d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niedermeier, Alexander, Vitali-Serdoz, Laura, Fischlein, Theodor, Kirste, Wolfgang, Buia, Veronica, Walaschek, Janusch, Rittger, Harald, Bastian, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960440
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248346
_version_ 1784622031633907712
author Niedermeier, Alexander
Vitali-Serdoz, Laura
Fischlein, Theodor
Kirste, Wolfgang
Buia, Veronica
Walaschek, Janusch
Rittger, Harald
Bastian, Dirk
author_facet Niedermeier, Alexander
Vitali-Serdoz, Laura
Fischlein, Theodor
Kirste, Wolfgang
Buia, Veronica
Walaschek, Janusch
Rittger, Harald
Bastian, Dirk
author_sort Niedermeier, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Background: ICDs and pacemakers for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are complex devices with different sensors and automatic algorithms implanted in patients with advanced cardiac diseases. Data on the perioperative management and outcome of CRT carriers undergoing surgery unrelated to the device are scarce. Methods: Data from 198 CRT device carriers (100 with active rate responsive sensor) were evaluated regarding perioperative adverse (device-related) events (A(D)E) and lead parameter changes. Results: Thirty-nine adverse observations were documented in 180 patients during preoperative interrogation, which were most often related to the left-ventricular lead and requiring intervention/reprogramming in 22 cases (12%). Anesthesia-related events occurred in 69 patients. There was no ADE for non-cardiac surgery and in pacemaker-dependent patients not programmed to an asynchronous pacing mode. Post-operative device interrogation showed significant lead parameter changes in 64/179 patients (36%) requiring reprogramming in 29 cases (16%). Conclusion: The left-ventricular pacing lead represents the most vulnerable system component. Comprehensive pre and post-interventional device interrogation is mandatory to ensure proper system function. The type of ICD function suspension has no impact on each patient’s outcome. Precautionary activity sensor deactivation is not required for non-cardiac interventions. Routine prophylactic device reprogramming to asynchronous pacing appears inessential. Most of the CRT pacemakers do not require surgery-related reprogramming.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8705781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87057812021-12-25 Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Niedermeier, Alexander Vitali-Serdoz, Laura Fischlein, Theodor Kirste, Wolfgang Buia, Veronica Walaschek, Janusch Rittger, Harald Bastian, Dirk Sensors (Basel) Article Background: ICDs and pacemakers for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are complex devices with different sensors and automatic algorithms implanted in patients with advanced cardiac diseases. Data on the perioperative management and outcome of CRT carriers undergoing surgery unrelated to the device are scarce. Methods: Data from 198 CRT device carriers (100 with active rate responsive sensor) were evaluated regarding perioperative adverse (device-related) events (A(D)E) and lead parameter changes. Results: Thirty-nine adverse observations were documented in 180 patients during preoperative interrogation, which were most often related to the left-ventricular lead and requiring intervention/reprogramming in 22 cases (12%). Anesthesia-related events occurred in 69 patients. There was no ADE for non-cardiac surgery and in pacemaker-dependent patients not programmed to an asynchronous pacing mode. Post-operative device interrogation showed significant lead parameter changes in 64/179 patients (36%) requiring reprogramming in 29 cases (16%). Conclusion: The left-ventricular pacing lead represents the most vulnerable system component. Comprehensive pre and post-interventional device interrogation is mandatory to ensure proper system function. The type of ICD function suspension has no impact on each patient’s outcome. Precautionary activity sensor deactivation is not required for non-cardiac interventions. Routine prophylactic device reprogramming to asynchronous pacing appears inessential. Most of the CRT pacemakers do not require surgery-related reprogramming. MDPI 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8705781/ /pubmed/34960440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248346 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Niedermeier, Alexander
Vitali-Serdoz, Laura
Fischlein, Theodor
Kirste, Wolfgang
Buia, Veronica
Walaschek, Janusch
Rittger, Harald
Bastian, Dirk
Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
title Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
title_full Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
title_fullStr Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
title_short Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
title_sort perioperative sensor and algorithm programming in patients with implanted icds and pacemakers for cardiac resynchronization therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960440
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21248346
work_keys_str_mv AT niedermeieralexander perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT vitaliserdozlaura perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT fischleintheodor perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT kirstewolfgang perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT buiaveronica perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT walaschekjanusch perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT rittgerharald perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT bastiandirk perioperativesensorandalgorithmprogramminginpatientswithimplantedicdsandpacemakersforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy