Cargando…

Untargeted Analysis of Lemna minor Metabolites: Workflow and Prioritization Strategy Comparing Highly Confident Features between Different Mass Spectrometers

Metabolomics approaches provide a vast array of analytical datasets, which require a comprehensive analytical, statistical, and biochemical workflow to reveal changes in metabolic profiles. The biological interpretation of mass spectrometric metabolomics results is still obstructed by the reliable i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wahman, Rofida, Moser, Stefan, Bieber, Stefan, Cruzeiro, Catarina, Schröder, Peter, Gilg, August, Lesske, Frank, Letzel, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo11120832
_version_ 1784622096615211008
author Wahman, Rofida
Moser, Stefan
Bieber, Stefan
Cruzeiro, Catarina
Schröder, Peter
Gilg, August
Lesske, Frank
Letzel, Thomas
author_facet Wahman, Rofida
Moser, Stefan
Bieber, Stefan
Cruzeiro, Catarina
Schröder, Peter
Gilg, August
Lesske, Frank
Letzel, Thomas
author_sort Wahman, Rofida
collection PubMed
description Metabolomics approaches provide a vast array of analytical datasets, which require a comprehensive analytical, statistical, and biochemical workflow to reveal changes in metabolic profiles. The biological interpretation of mass spectrometric metabolomics results is still obstructed by the reliable identification of the metabolites as well as annotation and/or classification. In this work, the whole Lemna minor (common duckweed) was extracted using various solvents and analyzed utilizing polarity-extended liquid chromatography (reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC)-hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)) connected to two time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer types, individually. This study (introduces and) discusses three relevant topics for the untargeted workflow: (1) A comparison study of metabolome samples was performed with an untargeted data handling workflow in two different labs with two different mass spectrometers using the same plant material type. (2) A statistical procedure was observed prioritizing significant detected features (dependent and independent of the mass spectrometer using the predictive methodology Orthogonal Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA). (3) Relevant features were transferred to a prioritization tool (the FOR-IDENT platform (FI)) and were compared with the implemented compound database PLANT-IDENT (PI). This compound database is filled with relevant compounds of the Lemnaceae, Poaceae, Brassicaceae, and Nymphaceae families according to analytical criteria such as retention time (polarity and LogD (pH 7)) and accurate mass (empirical formula). Thus, an untargeted analysis was performed using the new tool as a prioritization and identification source for a hidden-target screening strategy. Consequently, forty-two compounds (amino acids, vitamins, flavonoids) could be recognized and subsequently validated in Lemna metabolic profile using reference standards. The class of flavonoids includes free aglycons and their glycosides. Further, according to our knowledge, the validated flavonoids robinetin and norwogonin were for the first time identified in the Lemna minor extracts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8706044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87060442021-12-25 Untargeted Analysis of Lemna minor Metabolites: Workflow and Prioritization Strategy Comparing Highly Confident Features between Different Mass Spectrometers Wahman, Rofida Moser, Stefan Bieber, Stefan Cruzeiro, Catarina Schröder, Peter Gilg, August Lesske, Frank Letzel, Thomas Metabolites Article Metabolomics approaches provide a vast array of analytical datasets, which require a comprehensive analytical, statistical, and biochemical workflow to reveal changes in metabolic profiles. The biological interpretation of mass spectrometric metabolomics results is still obstructed by the reliable identification of the metabolites as well as annotation and/or classification. In this work, the whole Lemna minor (common duckweed) was extracted using various solvents and analyzed utilizing polarity-extended liquid chromatography (reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC)-hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)) connected to two time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer types, individually. This study (introduces and) discusses three relevant topics for the untargeted workflow: (1) A comparison study of metabolome samples was performed with an untargeted data handling workflow in two different labs with two different mass spectrometers using the same plant material type. (2) A statistical procedure was observed prioritizing significant detected features (dependent and independent of the mass spectrometer using the predictive methodology Orthogonal Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA). (3) Relevant features were transferred to a prioritization tool (the FOR-IDENT platform (FI)) and were compared with the implemented compound database PLANT-IDENT (PI). This compound database is filled with relevant compounds of the Lemnaceae, Poaceae, Brassicaceae, and Nymphaceae families according to analytical criteria such as retention time (polarity and LogD (pH 7)) and accurate mass (empirical formula). Thus, an untargeted analysis was performed using the new tool as a prioritization and identification source for a hidden-target screening strategy. Consequently, forty-two compounds (amino acids, vitamins, flavonoids) could be recognized and subsequently validated in Lemna metabolic profile using reference standards. The class of flavonoids includes free aglycons and their glycosides. Further, according to our knowledge, the validated flavonoids robinetin and norwogonin were for the first time identified in the Lemna minor extracts. MDPI 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8706044/ /pubmed/34940590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo11120832 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wahman, Rofida
Moser, Stefan
Bieber, Stefan
Cruzeiro, Catarina
Schröder, Peter
Gilg, August
Lesske, Frank
Letzel, Thomas
Untargeted Analysis of Lemna minor Metabolites: Workflow and Prioritization Strategy Comparing Highly Confident Features between Different Mass Spectrometers
title Untargeted Analysis of Lemna minor Metabolites: Workflow and Prioritization Strategy Comparing Highly Confident Features between Different Mass Spectrometers
title_full Untargeted Analysis of Lemna minor Metabolites: Workflow and Prioritization Strategy Comparing Highly Confident Features between Different Mass Spectrometers
title_fullStr Untargeted Analysis of Lemna minor Metabolites: Workflow and Prioritization Strategy Comparing Highly Confident Features between Different Mass Spectrometers
title_full_unstemmed Untargeted Analysis of Lemna minor Metabolites: Workflow and Prioritization Strategy Comparing Highly Confident Features between Different Mass Spectrometers
title_short Untargeted Analysis of Lemna minor Metabolites: Workflow and Prioritization Strategy Comparing Highly Confident Features between Different Mass Spectrometers
title_sort untargeted analysis of lemna minor metabolites: workflow and prioritization strategy comparing highly confident features between different mass spectrometers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo11120832
work_keys_str_mv AT wahmanrofida untargetedanalysisoflemnaminormetabolitesworkflowandprioritizationstrategycomparinghighlyconfidentfeaturesbetweendifferentmassspectrometers
AT moserstefan untargetedanalysisoflemnaminormetabolitesworkflowandprioritizationstrategycomparinghighlyconfidentfeaturesbetweendifferentmassspectrometers
AT bieberstefan untargetedanalysisoflemnaminormetabolitesworkflowandprioritizationstrategycomparinghighlyconfidentfeaturesbetweendifferentmassspectrometers
AT cruzeirocatarina untargetedanalysisoflemnaminormetabolitesworkflowandprioritizationstrategycomparinghighlyconfidentfeaturesbetweendifferentmassspectrometers
AT schroderpeter untargetedanalysisoflemnaminormetabolitesworkflowandprioritizationstrategycomparinghighlyconfidentfeaturesbetweendifferentmassspectrometers
AT gilgaugust untargetedanalysisoflemnaminormetabolitesworkflowandprioritizationstrategycomparinghighlyconfidentfeaturesbetweendifferentmassspectrometers
AT lesskefrank untargetedanalysisoflemnaminormetabolitesworkflowandprioritizationstrategycomparinghighlyconfidentfeaturesbetweendifferentmassspectrometers
AT letzelthomas untargetedanalysisoflemnaminormetabolitesworkflowandprioritizationstrategycomparinghighlyconfidentfeaturesbetweendifferentmassspectrometers