Cargando…

Comparison of Silane Heat Treatment by Laser and Various Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin/Lithium Disilicate

In the current study, we evaluated the effects of heat treatment (by Er:YAG or furnace) and various surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of silanized lithium disilicate ceramic. Seventy lithium disilicate (IPS e. max Press; Ivoclar Vivadent) and composite resin (Tetric N-Ceram...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ergun-Kunt, Goknil, Sasany, Rafat, Koca, Mehmet Faruk, Özcan, Mutlu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247808
_version_ 1784622111713656832
author Ergun-Kunt, Goknil
Sasany, Rafat
Koca, Mehmet Faruk
Özcan, Mutlu
author_facet Ergun-Kunt, Goknil
Sasany, Rafat
Koca, Mehmet Faruk
Özcan, Mutlu
author_sort Ergun-Kunt, Goknil
collection PubMed
description In the current study, we evaluated the effects of heat treatment (by Er:YAG or furnace) and various surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of silanized lithium disilicate ceramic. Seventy lithium disilicate (IPS e. max Press; Ivoclar Vivadent) and composite resin (Tetric N-Ceram; Ivoclar Vivadent) blocks were made and distributed into seven groups (n = 10) at random: S: silanization alone; ALS: airborne particle abrasion (APA) and silanization; SC: APA modified with silica and silanization; SHT1: silanization and heat treatment by Er:YAG; SHT2: silanization and heat treatment performed in the furnace (100 °C, 1 min); HF: etching with HF; and HFS: etching with HF and silanization. Every ceramic specimen was cemented to a composite resin block after surface treatment. Cemented specimens were embedded into acrylic resin and were tested with the μTBS test. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tamhane T2 tests (α = 0.05). The SHT1 group had the highest bond of strength compared to the other groups (27.46 MPa). The ALS group had the lowest strength of the groups (15.56 MPa). Between SHT2 and HFS (p = 1), the comparison of the mean µTBS values showed no significant differences. It was concluded that silane heat treatment increased the resin composite–ceramic bond strength; however, within the terms of μTBS, the Er:YAG laser treatment was more successful than other surface treatment applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8706105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87061052021-12-25 Comparison of Silane Heat Treatment by Laser and Various Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin/Lithium Disilicate Ergun-Kunt, Goknil Sasany, Rafat Koca, Mehmet Faruk Özcan, Mutlu Materials (Basel) Article In the current study, we evaluated the effects of heat treatment (by Er:YAG or furnace) and various surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of silanized lithium disilicate ceramic. Seventy lithium disilicate (IPS e. max Press; Ivoclar Vivadent) and composite resin (Tetric N-Ceram; Ivoclar Vivadent) blocks were made and distributed into seven groups (n = 10) at random: S: silanization alone; ALS: airborne particle abrasion (APA) and silanization; SC: APA modified with silica and silanization; SHT1: silanization and heat treatment by Er:YAG; SHT2: silanization and heat treatment performed in the furnace (100 °C, 1 min); HF: etching with HF; and HFS: etching with HF and silanization. Every ceramic specimen was cemented to a composite resin block after surface treatment. Cemented specimens were embedded into acrylic resin and were tested with the μTBS test. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tamhane T2 tests (α = 0.05). The SHT1 group had the highest bond of strength compared to the other groups (27.46 MPa). The ALS group had the lowest strength of the groups (15.56 MPa). Between SHT2 and HFS (p = 1), the comparison of the mean µTBS values showed no significant differences. It was concluded that silane heat treatment increased the resin composite–ceramic bond strength; however, within the terms of μTBS, the Er:YAG laser treatment was more successful than other surface treatment applications. MDPI 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8706105/ /pubmed/34947402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247808 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ergun-Kunt, Goknil
Sasany, Rafat
Koca, Mehmet Faruk
Özcan, Mutlu
Comparison of Silane Heat Treatment by Laser and Various Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin/Lithium Disilicate
title Comparison of Silane Heat Treatment by Laser and Various Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin/Lithium Disilicate
title_full Comparison of Silane Heat Treatment by Laser and Various Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin/Lithium Disilicate
title_fullStr Comparison of Silane Heat Treatment by Laser and Various Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin/Lithium Disilicate
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Silane Heat Treatment by Laser and Various Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin/Lithium Disilicate
title_short Comparison of Silane Heat Treatment by Laser and Various Surface Treatments on Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin/Lithium Disilicate
title_sort comparison of silane heat treatment by laser and various surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of composite resin/lithium disilicate
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247808
work_keys_str_mv AT ergunkuntgoknil comparisonofsilaneheattreatmentbylaserandvarioussurfacetreatmentsonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcompositeresinlithiumdisilicate
AT sasanyrafat comparisonofsilaneheattreatmentbylaserandvarioussurfacetreatmentsonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcompositeresinlithiumdisilicate
AT kocamehmetfaruk comparisonofsilaneheattreatmentbylaserandvarioussurfacetreatmentsonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcompositeresinlithiumdisilicate
AT ozcanmutlu comparisonofsilaneheattreatmentbylaserandvarioussurfacetreatmentsonmicrotensilebondstrengthofcompositeresinlithiumdisilicate