Cargando…
Trueness of Intraoral Scanners in Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Analysis on the Effect of Operators’ Experience and Implant Number
(1) Background: Intraoral scanners (IOS) are widely used in prosthodontics. However, a good trueness is mandatory to achieve optimal clinical results. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare two IOS considering the operator’s experience and different implant clinical scenarios. (2) Meth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245917 |
_version_ | 1784622138704003072 |
---|---|
author | Pesce, Paolo Bagnasco, Francesco Pancini, Nicolò Colombo, Marco Canullo, Luigi Pera, Francesco Bressan, Eriberto Annunziata, Marco Menini, Maria |
author_facet | Pesce, Paolo Bagnasco, Francesco Pancini, Nicolò Colombo, Marco Canullo, Luigi Pera, Francesco Bressan, Eriberto Annunziata, Marco Menini, Maria |
author_sort | Pesce, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: Intraoral scanners (IOS) are widely used in prosthodontics. However, a good trueness is mandatory to achieve optimal clinical results. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare two IOS considering the operator’s experience and different implant clinical scenarios. (2) Methods: Two IOS (IT—Itero, Align Technology; and OP—Opera MC, Opera System, Monaco) were compared simulating three different clinical scenarios: single implant, two implants, and full-arch rehabilitation. Ten scans were taken for each configuration by two different operators (one expert, one inexperienced); influence of operator experience and the type of scanner used was investigated. (3) Results: Trueness of the scans differed between the experienced and non-experienced operator and this difference was statistically significant in all the three scenarios (p = 0.000–0.001, 0.037). A significant difference was present between the scanners (p = 0.000), in the two-implant and full-arch scenarios (p = 0.00). (4) Conclusions: Experience of the operator significantly affect trueness of IT and OP scanners. A statistically significant difference was present among IOS in the two-implant and full-arch scenarios. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8706214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87062142021-12-25 Trueness of Intraoral Scanners in Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Analysis on the Effect of Operators’ Experience and Implant Number Pesce, Paolo Bagnasco, Francesco Pancini, Nicolò Colombo, Marco Canullo, Luigi Pera, Francesco Bressan, Eriberto Annunziata, Marco Menini, Maria J Clin Med Article (1) Background: Intraoral scanners (IOS) are widely used in prosthodontics. However, a good trueness is mandatory to achieve optimal clinical results. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare two IOS considering the operator’s experience and different implant clinical scenarios. (2) Methods: Two IOS (IT—Itero, Align Technology; and OP—Opera MC, Opera System, Monaco) were compared simulating three different clinical scenarios: single implant, two implants, and full-arch rehabilitation. Ten scans were taken for each configuration by two different operators (one expert, one inexperienced); influence of operator experience and the type of scanner used was investigated. (3) Results: Trueness of the scans differed between the experienced and non-experienced operator and this difference was statistically significant in all the three scenarios (p = 0.000–0.001, 0.037). A significant difference was present between the scanners (p = 0.000), in the two-implant and full-arch scenarios (p = 0.00). (4) Conclusions: Experience of the operator significantly affect trueness of IT and OP scanners. A statistically significant difference was present among IOS in the two-implant and full-arch scenarios. MDPI 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8706214/ /pubmed/34945211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245917 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pesce, Paolo Bagnasco, Francesco Pancini, Nicolò Colombo, Marco Canullo, Luigi Pera, Francesco Bressan, Eriberto Annunziata, Marco Menini, Maria Trueness of Intraoral Scanners in Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Analysis on the Effect of Operators’ Experience and Implant Number |
title | Trueness of Intraoral Scanners in Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Analysis on the Effect of Operators’ Experience and Implant Number |
title_full | Trueness of Intraoral Scanners in Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Analysis on the Effect of Operators’ Experience and Implant Number |
title_fullStr | Trueness of Intraoral Scanners in Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Analysis on the Effect of Operators’ Experience and Implant Number |
title_full_unstemmed | Trueness of Intraoral Scanners in Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Analysis on the Effect of Operators’ Experience and Implant Number |
title_short | Trueness of Intraoral Scanners in Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: An In Vitro Analysis on the Effect of Operators’ Experience and Implant Number |
title_sort | trueness of intraoral scanners in implant-supported rehabilitations: an in vitro analysis on the effect of operators’ experience and implant number |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245917 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pescepaolo truenessofintraoralscannersinimplantsupportedrehabilitationsaninvitroanalysisontheeffectofoperatorsexperienceandimplantnumber AT bagnascofrancesco truenessofintraoralscannersinimplantsupportedrehabilitationsaninvitroanalysisontheeffectofoperatorsexperienceandimplantnumber AT pancininicolo truenessofintraoralscannersinimplantsupportedrehabilitationsaninvitroanalysisontheeffectofoperatorsexperienceandimplantnumber AT colombomarco truenessofintraoralscannersinimplantsupportedrehabilitationsaninvitroanalysisontheeffectofoperatorsexperienceandimplantnumber AT canulloluigi truenessofintraoralscannersinimplantsupportedrehabilitationsaninvitroanalysisontheeffectofoperatorsexperienceandimplantnumber AT perafrancesco truenessofintraoralscannersinimplantsupportedrehabilitationsaninvitroanalysisontheeffectofoperatorsexperienceandimplantnumber AT bressaneriberto truenessofintraoralscannersinimplantsupportedrehabilitationsaninvitroanalysisontheeffectofoperatorsexperienceandimplantnumber AT annunziatamarco truenessofintraoralscannersinimplantsupportedrehabilitationsaninvitroanalysisontheeffectofoperatorsexperienceandimplantnumber AT meninimaria truenessofintraoralscannersinimplantsupportedrehabilitationsaninvitroanalysisontheeffectofoperatorsexperienceandimplantnumber |