Cargando…

Quantitative Evidence for the Dependence of Highly Crystalline Single Wall Carbon Nanotube Synthesis on the Growth Method

We present a study quantitatively demonstrating that the method of synthesis (gas phase, fixed bed, non-fixed bed) represents a determining factor in the level of crystallinity in growing single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs). Using far infrared spectroscopy, the “effective length” (associated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsuji, Takashi, Chen, Guohai, Morimoto, Takahiro, Shimizu, Yoshiki, Kim, Jaeho, Sakakita, Hajime, Hata, Kenji, Sakurai, Shunsuke, Kobashi, Kazufumi, Futaba, Don N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11123461
Descripción
Sumario:We present a study quantitatively demonstrating that the method of synthesis (gas phase, fixed bed, non-fixed bed) represents a determining factor in the level of crystallinity in growing single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs). Using far infrared spectroscopy, the “effective length” (associated with the level of crystallinity) was estimated for CNTs grown using various synthetic methods (lab-produced and supplemented by commercially purchased SWCNTs) as a metric for crystallinity (i.e., defect density). Analysis of the observed “effective lengths” showed that the SWCNTs fell into two general groups: long and short (high and low crystallinity) synthesized by gas-phase methods and all other supported catalyst methods, respectively. Importantly, the “long” group exhibited effective lengths in the range of 700–2200 nm, which was greater than double that of the typical values representing the “short” group (110–490 nm). These results highlight the significant difference in crystallinity. We interpret that the difference in the crystallinity stemmed from stress concentration at the nanotube-catalyst interface during the growth process, which originated from various sources of mismatch in growth rates (e.g., vertically aligned array) as well as impact stress from contact with other substrates during fluidization or rotation. These results are consistent with well-accepted belief, but now are demonstrated quantitatively.