Cargando…

The Influence of Decontamination Procedures on the Surface of Two Polymeric Liners Used in Prosthodontics

Polymeric liners are materials commonly used in prosthodontics to reshape denture surfaces contacting the soft tissues of the oral cavity. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of different cleaning methods on two polymeric materials used in prosthodontics as non-adhesive permanent liners...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mańka-Malara, Katarzyna, Trzaskowski, Maciej, Gawlak, Dominika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13244340
_version_ 1784622281217015808
author Mańka-Malara, Katarzyna
Trzaskowski, Maciej
Gawlak, Dominika
author_facet Mańka-Malara, Katarzyna
Trzaskowski, Maciej
Gawlak, Dominika
author_sort Mańka-Malara, Katarzyna
collection PubMed
description Polymeric liners are materials commonly used in prosthodontics to reshape denture surfaces contacting the soft tissues of the oral cavity. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of different cleaning methods on two polymeric materials used in prosthodontics as non-adhesive permanent liners. The material for the research consisted of samples made from Mollosil Plus (Detax, Ettlingen, Germany)—direct polysiloxan liner; and Plastitanium (Pressing Dental, San Marino, Republic of San Marino)—an injection-molded liner. A total of 198 samples were made, 99 of each assessed material. They were exposed to different cleaning methods—a toothbrush, a toothbrush and soap, a toothbrush and toothpaste (BlendaMed, Procter&Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, USA), a toothpaste and denture cleaning paste (Protefix Hygiene Denture Paste, Queisser Pharma, Germany), denture cleansing tablets (Protefix Hygiene Cleaning Tablets, Queisse Pharma, Germany), and a disinfecting spray (Aftermat, Port Jefferson Station, New York City, NY, USA)—for 1 min, 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min. The image acquisition was performed with scanning electron microscopy and samples were analyzed for the homogeneity of their surfaces—the presence of holes, grooves, precipitate, and small and large separating pieces of the material marking departures from this homogeneity. For each type of damage, one point was given. Continuous data from two groups were compared with Mann–Whitney U testing. Due to a small sample size and distribution of variables other than normal, to compare more than two groups, Kruskal–Wallis testing with post hoc analysis (Dunn test with Bonferroni correction) was used. Categorical data were compared with the chi-square test and the Fisher’s exact test. The Mollosil Plus material should be decontaminated with the use of a toothbrush or toothbrush with soap, while Plastitanium material should be disinfected. Plastitanium samples are more susceptible to damage during the decontamination procedures than Mollosil Plus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8706804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87068042021-12-25 The Influence of Decontamination Procedures on the Surface of Two Polymeric Liners Used in Prosthodontics Mańka-Malara, Katarzyna Trzaskowski, Maciej Gawlak, Dominika Polymers (Basel) Article Polymeric liners are materials commonly used in prosthodontics to reshape denture surfaces contacting the soft tissues of the oral cavity. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of different cleaning methods on two polymeric materials used in prosthodontics as non-adhesive permanent liners. The material for the research consisted of samples made from Mollosil Plus (Detax, Ettlingen, Germany)—direct polysiloxan liner; and Plastitanium (Pressing Dental, San Marino, Republic of San Marino)—an injection-molded liner. A total of 198 samples were made, 99 of each assessed material. They were exposed to different cleaning methods—a toothbrush, a toothbrush and soap, a toothbrush and toothpaste (BlendaMed, Procter&Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, USA), a toothpaste and denture cleaning paste (Protefix Hygiene Denture Paste, Queisser Pharma, Germany), denture cleansing tablets (Protefix Hygiene Cleaning Tablets, Queisse Pharma, Germany), and a disinfecting spray (Aftermat, Port Jefferson Station, New York City, NY, USA)—for 1 min, 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min. The image acquisition was performed with scanning electron microscopy and samples were analyzed for the homogeneity of their surfaces—the presence of holes, grooves, precipitate, and small and large separating pieces of the material marking departures from this homogeneity. For each type of damage, one point was given. Continuous data from two groups were compared with Mann–Whitney U testing. Due to a small sample size and distribution of variables other than normal, to compare more than two groups, Kruskal–Wallis testing with post hoc analysis (Dunn test with Bonferroni correction) was used. Categorical data were compared with the chi-square test and the Fisher’s exact test. The Mollosil Plus material should be decontaminated with the use of a toothbrush or toothbrush with soap, while Plastitanium material should be disinfected. Plastitanium samples are more susceptible to damage during the decontamination procedures than Mollosil Plus. MDPI 2021-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8706804/ /pubmed/34960891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13244340 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mańka-Malara, Katarzyna
Trzaskowski, Maciej
Gawlak, Dominika
The Influence of Decontamination Procedures on the Surface of Two Polymeric Liners Used in Prosthodontics
title The Influence of Decontamination Procedures on the Surface of Two Polymeric Liners Used in Prosthodontics
title_full The Influence of Decontamination Procedures on the Surface of Two Polymeric Liners Used in Prosthodontics
title_fullStr The Influence of Decontamination Procedures on the Surface of Two Polymeric Liners Used in Prosthodontics
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Decontamination Procedures on the Surface of Two Polymeric Liners Used in Prosthodontics
title_short The Influence of Decontamination Procedures on the Surface of Two Polymeric Liners Used in Prosthodontics
title_sort influence of decontamination procedures on the surface of two polymeric liners used in prosthodontics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34960891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13244340
work_keys_str_mv AT mankamalarakatarzyna theinfluenceofdecontaminationproceduresonthesurfaceoftwopolymericlinersusedinprosthodontics
AT trzaskowskimaciej theinfluenceofdecontaminationproceduresonthesurfaceoftwopolymericlinersusedinprosthodontics
AT gawlakdominika theinfluenceofdecontaminationproceduresonthesurfaceoftwopolymericlinersusedinprosthodontics
AT mankamalarakatarzyna influenceofdecontaminationproceduresonthesurfaceoftwopolymericlinersusedinprosthodontics
AT trzaskowskimaciej influenceofdecontaminationproceduresonthesurfaceoftwopolymericlinersusedinprosthodontics
AT gawlakdominika influenceofdecontaminationproceduresonthesurfaceoftwopolymericlinersusedinprosthodontics