Cargando…

Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication

The structural features and nanoindentation/tribological properties of 316 stainless steel fabricated by conventional rolling and laser-based powder bed fusion (LPBF) were comparatively investigated regarding the effect of surface-pulsed plasma treatment (PPT). PPT was performed using an electrother...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chabak, Yuliia, Efremenko, Bohdan, Petryshynets, Ivan, Efremenko, Vasily, Lekatou, Angeliki G., Zurnadzhy, Vadym, Bogomol, Iurii, Fedun, Victor, Kovaľ, Karol, Pastukhova, Tatiana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247671
_version_ 1784622283872010240
author Chabak, Yuliia
Efremenko, Bohdan
Petryshynets, Ivan
Efremenko, Vasily
Lekatou, Angeliki G.
Zurnadzhy, Vadym
Bogomol, Iurii
Fedun, Victor
Kovaľ, Karol
Pastukhova, Tatiana
author_facet Chabak, Yuliia
Efremenko, Bohdan
Petryshynets, Ivan
Efremenko, Vasily
Lekatou, Angeliki G.
Zurnadzhy, Vadym
Bogomol, Iurii
Fedun, Victor
Kovaľ, Karol
Pastukhova, Tatiana
author_sort Chabak, Yuliia
collection PubMed
description The structural features and nanoindentation/tribological properties of 316 stainless steel fabricated by conventional rolling and laser-based powder bed fusion (LPBF) were comparatively investigated regarding the effect of surface-pulsed plasma treatment (PPT). PPT was performed using an electrothermal axial plasma accelerator under a discharge voltage of 4.5 kV and a pulse duration of 1 ms. Optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, nanoindentation measurements and tribological tests were applied to characterize the alloys. The LPBF steel presented almost the same modulus of elasticity and double the hardness of rolled steel. However, the LPBF steel manifested lower dry-sliding wear resistance compared with its wrought counterpart due to its porous structure and non-metallic inclusions. Conversely, LPBF steel showed three times higher wear resistance under sliding in simulated body fluid (SBF), as compared with wrought steel. PPT led to steel modification through surface melting to a depth of 22–26 μm, which resulted in a fine cellular structure. PPT moderately improved the dry-sliding wear resistance of LPBF steel by fusion of pores on its surface. On the other hand, PPT had almost no effect on the SBF-sliding wear response of the steel. The modification features were analyzed using a computer simulation of plasma-induced heating.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8706815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87068152021-12-25 Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication Chabak, Yuliia Efremenko, Bohdan Petryshynets, Ivan Efremenko, Vasily Lekatou, Angeliki G. Zurnadzhy, Vadym Bogomol, Iurii Fedun, Victor Kovaľ, Karol Pastukhova, Tatiana Materials (Basel) Article The structural features and nanoindentation/tribological properties of 316 stainless steel fabricated by conventional rolling and laser-based powder bed fusion (LPBF) were comparatively investigated regarding the effect of surface-pulsed plasma treatment (PPT). PPT was performed using an electrothermal axial plasma accelerator under a discharge voltage of 4.5 kV and a pulse duration of 1 ms. Optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, nanoindentation measurements and tribological tests were applied to characterize the alloys. The LPBF steel presented almost the same modulus of elasticity and double the hardness of rolled steel. However, the LPBF steel manifested lower dry-sliding wear resistance compared with its wrought counterpart due to its porous structure and non-metallic inclusions. Conversely, LPBF steel showed three times higher wear resistance under sliding in simulated body fluid (SBF), as compared with wrought steel. PPT led to steel modification through surface melting to a depth of 22–26 μm, which resulted in a fine cellular structure. PPT moderately improved the dry-sliding wear resistance of LPBF steel by fusion of pores on its surface. On the other hand, PPT had almost no effect on the SBF-sliding wear response of the steel. The modification features were analyzed using a computer simulation of plasma-induced heating. MDPI 2021-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8706815/ /pubmed/34947267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247671 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chabak, Yuliia
Efremenko, Bohdan
Petryshynets, Ivan
Efremenko, Vasily
Lekatou, Angeliki G.
Zurnadzhy, Vadym
Bogomol, Iurii
Fedun, Victor
Kovaľ, Karol
Pastukhova, Tatiana
Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication
title Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication
title_full Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication
title_fullStr Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication
title_full_unstemmed Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication
title_short Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication
title_sort structural and tribological assessment of biomedical 316 stainless steel subjected to pulsed-plasma surface modification: comparison of lpbf 3d printing and conventional fabrication
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247671
work_keys_str_mv AT chabakyuliia structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication
AT efremenkobohdan structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication
AT petryshynetsivan structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication
AT efremenkovasily structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication
AT lekatouangelikig structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication
AT zurnadzhyvadym structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication
AT bogomoliurii structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication
AT fedunvictor structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication
AT kovalkarol structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication
AT pastukhovatatiana structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication