Cargando…
Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication
The structural features and nanoindentation/tribological properties of 316 stainless steel fabricated by conventional rolling and laser-based powder bed fusion (LPBF) were comparatively investigated regarding the effect of surface-pulsed plasma treatment (PPT). PPT was performed using an electrother...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247671 |
_version_ | 1784622283872010240 |
---|---|
author | Chabak, Yuliia Efremenko, Bohdan Petryshynets, Ivan Efremenko, Vasily Lekatou, Angeliki G. Zurnadzhy, Vadym Bogomol, Iurii Fedun, Victor Kovaľ, Karol Pastukhova, Tatiana |
author_facet | Chabak, Yuliia Efremenko, Bohdan Petryshynets, Ivan Efremenko, Vasily Lekatou, Angeliki G. Zurnadzhy, Vadym Bogomol, Iurii Fedun, Victor Kovaľ, Karol Pastukhova, Tatiana |
author_sort | Chabak, Yuliia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The structural features and nanoindentation/tribological properties of 316 stainless steel fabricated by conventional rolling and laser-based powder bed fusion (LPBF) were comparatively investigated regarding the effect of surface-pulsed plasma treatment (PPT). PPT was performed using an electrothermal axial plasma accelerator under a discharge voltage of 4.5 kV and a pulse duration of 1 ms. Optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, nanoindentation measurements and tribological tests were applied to characterize the alloys. The LPBF steel presented almost the same modulus of elasticity and double the hardness of rolled steel. However, the LPBF steel manifested lower dry-sliding wear resistance compared with its wrought counterpart due to its porous structure and non-metallic inclusions. Conversely, LPBF steel showed three times higher wear resistance under sliding in simulated body fluid (SBF), as compared with wrought steel. PPT led to steel modification through surface melting to a depth of 22–26 μm, which resulted in a fine cellular structure. PPT moderately improved the dry-sliding wear resistance of LPBF steel by fusion of pores on its surface. On the other hand, PPT had almost no effect on the SBF-sliding wear response of the steel. The modification features were analyzed using a computer simulation of plasma-induced heating. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8706815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87068152021-12-25 Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication Chabak, Yuliia Efremenko, Bohdan Petryshynets, Ivan Efremenko, Vasily Lekatou, Angeliki G. Zurnadzhy, Vadym Bogomol, Iurii Fedun, Victor Kovaľ, Karol Pastukhova, Tatiana Materials (Basel) Article The structural features and nanoindentation/tribological properties of 316 stainless steel fabricated by conventional rolling and laser-based powder bed fusion (LPBF) were comparatively investigated regarding the effect of surface-pulsed plasma treatment (PPT). PPT was performed using an electrothermal axial plasma accelerator under a discharge voltage of 4.5 kV and a pulse duration of 1 ms. Optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, nanoindentation measurements and tribological tests were applied to characterize the alloys. The LPBF steel presented almost the same modulus of elasticity and double the hardness of rolled steel. However, the LPBF steel manifested lower dry-sliding wear resistance compared with its wrought counterpart due to its porous structure and non-metallic inclusions. Conversely, LPBF steel showed three times higher wear resistance under sliding in simulated body fluid (SBF), as compared with wrought steel. PPT led to steel modification through surface melting to a depth of 22–26 μm, which resulted in a fine cellular structure. PPT moderately improved the dry-sliding wear resistance of LPBF steel by fusion of pores on its surface. On the other hand, PPT had almost no effect on the SBF-sliding wear response of the steel. The modification features were analyzed using a computer simulation of plasma-induced heating. MDPI 2021-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8706815/ /pubmed/34947267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247671 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chabak, Yuliia Efremenko, Bohdan Petryshynets, Ivan Efremenko, Vasily Lekatou, Angeliki G. Zurnadzhy, Vadym Bogomol, Iurii Fedun, Victor Kovaľ, Karol Pastukhova, Tatiana Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication |
title | Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication |
title_full | Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication |
title_fullStr | Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication |
title_full_unstemmed | Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication |
title_short | Structural and Tribological Assessment of Biomedical 316 Stainless Steel Subjected to Pulsed-Plasma Surface Modification: Comparison of LPBF 3D Printing and Conventional Fabrication |
title_sort | structural and tribological assessment of biomedical 316 stainless steel subjected to pulsed-plasma surface modification: comparison of lpbf 3d printing and conventional fabrication |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chabakyuliia structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication AT efremenkobohdan structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication AT petryshynetsivan structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication AT efremenkovasily structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication AT lekatouangelikig structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication AT zurnadzhyvadym structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication AT bogomoliurii structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication AT fedunvictor structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication AT kovalkarol structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication AT pastukhovatatiana structuralandtribologicalassessmentofbiomedical316stainlesssteelsubjectedtopulsedplasmasurfacemodificationcomparisonoflpbf3dprintingandconventionalfabrication |