Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the resistance to fracture of interim restorations obtained through additive techniques (3D impressions) and subtractive techniques (milling) using a computer-aided design and manufacture (CAD/CAM) system of a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abad-Coronel, Cristian, Carrera, Elena, Mena Córdova, Nancy, Fajardo, Jorge I., Aliaga, Paulina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247791
_version_ 1784622292969455616
author Abad-Coronel, Cristian
Carrera, Elena
Mena Córdova, Nancy
Fajardo, Jorge I.
Aliaga, Paulina
author_facet Abad-Coronel, Cristian
Carrera, Elena
Mena Córdova, Nancy
Fajardo, Jorge I.
Aliaga, Paulina
author_sort Abad-Coronel, Cristian
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the resistance to fracture of interim restorations obtained through additive techniques (3D impressions) and subtractive techniques (milling) using a computer-aided design and manufacture (CAD/CAM) system of a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) to ascertain its clinical importance. (1) Materials and methods: In total, 40 samples were manufactured and divided into two groups (n = 20) using: (1) light-curing micro hybrid resin for temporary crowns and bridges (PriZma 3D Bio Prov, MarketechLabs, São Paulo, Brazil) for the rapid prototyping group (RP) and (2) a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) CAD/CAM disc (Vipiblock Trilux, VIPI, São Paulo, Brazil) for the computer-assisted milling (CC). The resistance to fracture was determined with a universal testing machine. (2) Results: The strength and the standard deviation for the computer-assisted milling group were higher (1663.57 ± 130.25 N) than the rapid prototyping (RP) group, which had lower values of (1437.74 ± 73.41 N). (3) Conclusions: The provisional restorations from the computer-assisted milling group showed a greater resistance to fracture than the provisional restorations obtained from the rapid prototyping group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8706852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87068522021-12-25 Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis Abad-Coronel, Cristian Carrera, Elena Mena Córdova, Nancy Fajardo, Jorge I. Aliaga, Paulina Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the resistance to fracture of interim restorations obtained through additive techniques (3D impressions) and subtractive techniques (milling) using a computer-aided design and manufacture (CAD/CAM) system of a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) to ascertain its clinical importance. (1) Materials and methods: In total, 40 samples were manufactured and divided into two groups (n = 20) using: (1) light-curing micro hybrid resin for temporary crowns and bridges (PriZma 3D Bio Prov, MarketechLabs, São Paulo, Brazil) for the rapid prototyping group (RP) and (2) a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) CAD/CAM disc (Vipiblock Trilux, VIPI, São Paulo, Brazil) for the computer-assisted milling (CC). The resistance to fracture was determined with a universal testing machine. (2) Results: The strength and the standard deviation for the computer-assisted milling group were higher (1663.57 ± 130.25 N) than the rapid prototyping (RP) group, which had lower values of (1437.74 ± 73.41 N). (3) Conclusions: The provisional restorations from the computer-assisted milling group showed a greater resistance to fracture than the provisional restorations obtained from the rapid prototyping group. MDPI 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8706852/ /pubmed/34947384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247791 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Abad-Coronel, Cristian
Carrera, Elena
Mena Córdova, Nancy
Fajardo, Jorge I.
Aliaga, Paulina
Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis
title Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis
title_full Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis
title_short Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis
title_sort comparative analysis of fracture resistance between cad/cam materials for interim fixed prosthesis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247791
work_keys_str_mv AT abadcoronelcristian comparativeanalysisoffractureresistancebetweencadcammaterialsforinterimfixedprosthesis
AT carreraelena comparativeanalysisoffractureresistancebetweencadcammaterialsforinterimfixedprosthesis
AT menacordovanancy comparativeanalysisoffractureresistancebetweencadcammaterialsforinterimfixedprosthesis
AT fajardojorgei comparativeanalysisoffractureresistancebetweencadcammaterialsforinterimfixedprosthesis
AT aliagapaulina comparativeanalysisoffractureresistancebetweencadcammaterialsforinterimfixedprosthesis