Cargando…
Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane
Carbonaceous adsorbents have been pointed out as promising adsorbents for the recovery of methane from its mixture with carbon dioxide, including biogas. This is because of the fact that CO(2) is more strongly adsorbed and also diffuses faster compared to methane in these materials. Therefore, the p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247759 |
_version_ | 1784622297487769600 |
---|---|
author | Bałys, Mieczysław Brodawka, Ewelina Jodłowski, Grzegorz Stefan Szczurowski, Jakub Wójcik, Marta |
author_facet | Bałys, Mieczysław Brodawka, Ewelina Jodłowski, Grzegorz Stefan Szczurowski, Jakub Wójcik, Marta |
author_sort | Bałys, Mieczysław |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carbonaceous adsorbents have been pointed out as promising adsorbents for the recovery of methane from its mixture with carbon dioxide, including biogas. This is because of the fact that CO(2) is more strongly adsorbed and also diffuses faster compared to methane in these materials. Therefore, the present study aimed to test alternative carbonaceous materials for the gas separation process with the purpose of enriching biogas in biomethane and to compare them with the commercial one. Among them was coconut shell activated carbon (AC) as the adsorbent derived from bio-waste, rubber tire pyrolysis char (RPC) as a by-product of waste utilization technology, and carbon molecular sieve (CMS) as the commercial material. The breakthrough experiments were conducted using two mixtures, a methane-rich mixture (consisting of 75% CH(4) and 25% CO(2)) and a carbon dioxide-rich mixture (containing 25% CH(4) and 75% CO(2)). This investigation showed that the AC sample would be a better candidate material for the CH(4)/CO(2) separation using a fixed-bed adsorption column than the commercial CMS sample. It is worth mentioning that due to its poorly developed micropore structure, the RPC sample exhibited limited adsorption capacity for both compounds, particularly for CO(2). However, it was observed that for the methane-rich mixture, it was possible to obtain an instantaneous concentration of around 93% CH(4). This indicates that there is still much potential for the use of the RPC, but this raw material needs further treatment. The Yoon–Nelson model was used to predict breakthrough curves for the experimental data. The results show that the data for the AC were best fitted with this model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8706870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87068702021-12-25 Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane Bałys, Mieczysław Brodawka, Ewelina Jodłowski, Grzegorz Stefan Szczurowski, Jakub Wójcik, Marta Materials (Basel) Article Carbonaceous adsorbents have been pointed out as promising adsorbents for the recovery of methane from its mixture with carbon dioxide, including biogas. This is because of the fact that CO(2) is more strongly adsorbed and also diffuses faster compared to methane in these materials. Therefore, the present study aimed to test alternative carbonaceous materials for the gas separation process with the purpose of enriching biogas in biomethane and to compare them with the commercial one. Among them was coconut shell activated carbon (AC) as the adsorbent derived from bio-waste, rubber tire pyrolysis char (RPC) as a by-product of waste utilization technology, and carbon molecular sieve (CMS) as the commercial material. The breakthrough experiments were conducted using two mixtures, a methane-rich mixture (consisting of 75% CH(4) and 25% CO(2)) and a carbon dioxide-rich mixture (containing 25% CH(4) and 75% CO(2)). This investigation showed that the AC sample would be a better candidate material for the CH(4)/CO(2) separation using a fixed-bed adsorption column than the commercial CMS sample. It is worth mentioning that due to its poorly developed micropore structure, the RPC sample exhibited limited adsorption capacity for both compounds, particularly for CO(2). However, it was observed that for the methane-rich mixture, it was possible to obtain an instantaneous concentration of around 93% CH(4). This indicates that there is still much potential for the use of the RPC, but this raw material needs further treatment. The Yoon–Nelson model was used to predict breakthrough curves for the experimental data. The results show that the data for the AC were best fitted with this model. MDPI 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8706870/ /pubmed/34947349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247759 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bałys, Mieczysław Brodawka, Ewelina Jodłowski, Grzegorz Stefan Szczurowski, Jakub Wójcik, Marta Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane |
title | Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane |
title_full | Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane |
title_fullStr | Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane |
title_short | Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane |
title_sort | alternative materials for the enrichment of biogas with methane |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247759 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bałysmieczysław alternativematerialsfortheenrichmentofbiogaswithmethane AT brodawkaewelina alternativematerialsfortheenrichmentofbiogaswithmethane AT jodłowskigrzegorzstefan alternativematerialsfortheenrichmentofbiogaswithmethane AT szczurowskijakub alternativematerialsfortheenrichmentofbiogaswithmethane AT wojcikmarta alternativematerialsfortheenrichmentofbiogaswithmethane |