Cargando…

Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane

Carbonaceous adsorbents have been pointed out as promising adsorbents for the recovery of methane from its mixture with carbon dioxide, including biogas. This is because of the fact that CO(2) is more strongly adsorbed and also diffuses faster compared to methane in these materials. Therefore, the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bałys, Mieczysław, Brodawka, Ewelina, Jodłowski, Grzegorz Stefan, Szczurowski, Jakub, Wójcik, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247759
_version_ 1784622297487769600
author Bałys, Mieczysław
Brodawka, Ewelina
Jodłowski, Grzegorz Stefan
Szczurowski, Jakub
Wójcik, Marta
author_facet Bałys, Mieczysław
Brodawka, Ewelina
Jodłowski, Grzegorz Stefan
Szczurowski, Jakub
Wójcik, Marta
author_sort Bałys, Mieczysław
collection PubMed
description Carbonaceous adsorbents have been pointed out as promising adsorbents for the recovery of methane from its mixture with carbon dioxide, including biogas. This is because of the fact that CO(2) is more strongly adsorbed and also diffuses faster compared to methane in these materials. Therefore, the present study aimed to test alternative carbonaceous materials for the gas separation process with the purpose of enriching biogas in biomethane and to compare them with the commercial one. Among them was coconut shell activated carbon (AC) as the adsorbent derived from bio-waste, rubber tire pyrolysis char (RPC) as a by-product of waste utilization technology, and carbon molecular sieve (CMS) as the commercial material. The breakthrough experiments were conducted using two mixtures, a methane-rich mixture (consisting of 75% CH(4) and 25% CO(2)) and a carbon dioxide-rich mixture (containing 25% CH(4) and 75% CO(2)). This investigation showed that the AC sample would be a better candidate material for the CH(4)/CO(2) separation using a fixed-bed adsorption column than the commercial CMS sample. It is worth mentioning that due to its poorly developed micropore structure, the RPC sample exhibited limited adsorption capacity for both compounds, particularly for CO(2). However, it was observed that for the methane-rich mixture, it was possible to obtain an instantaneous concentration of around 93% CH(4). This indicates that there is still much potential for the use of the RPC, but this raw material needs further treatment. The Yoon–Nelson model was used to predict breakthrough curves for the experimental data. The results show that the data for the AC were best fitted with this model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8706870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87068702021-12-25 Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane Bałys, Mieczysław Brodawka, Ewelina Jodłowski, Grzegorz Stefan Szczurowski, Jakub Wójcik, Marta Materials (Basel) Article Carbonaceous adsorbents have been pointed out as promising adsorbents for the recovery of methane from its mixture with carbon dioxide, including biogas. This is because of the fact that CO(2) is more strongly adsorbed and also diffuses faster compared to methane in these materials. Therefore, the present study aimed to test alternative carbonaceous materials for the gas separation process with the purpose of enriching biogas in biomethane and to compare them with the commercial one. Among them was coconut shell activated carbon (AC) as the adsorbent derived from bio-waste, rubber tire pyrolysis char (RPC) as a by-product of waste utilization technology, and carbon molecular sieve (CMS) as the commercial material. The breakthrough experiments were conducted using two mixtures, a methane-rich mixture (consisting of 75% CH(4) and 25% CO(2)) and a carbon dioxide-rich mixture (containing 25% CH(4) and 75% CO(2)). This investigation showed that the AC sample would be a better candidate material for the CH(4)/CO(2) separation using a fixed-bed adsorption column than the commercial CMS sample. It is worth mentioning that due to its poorly developed micropore structure, the RPC sample exhibited limited adsorption capacity for both compounds, particularly for CO(2). However, it was observed that for the methane-rich mixture, it was possible to obtain an instantaneous concentration of around 93% CH(4). This indicates that there is still much potential for the use of the RPC, but this raw material needs further treatment. The Yoon–Nelson model was used to predict breakthrough curves for the experimental data. The results show that the data for the AC were best fitted with this model. MDPI 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8706870/ /pubmed/34947349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247759 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bałys, Mieczysław
Brodawka, Ewelina
Jodłowski, Grzegorz Stefan
Szczurowski, Jakub
Wójcik, Marta
Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane
title Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane
title_full Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane
title_fullStr Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane
title_full_unstemmed Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane
title_short Alternative Materials for the Enrichment of Biogas with Methane
title_sort alternative materials for the enrichment of biogas with methane
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247759
work_keys_str_mv AT bałysmieczysław alternativematerialsfortheenrichmentofbiogaswithmethane
AT brodawkaewelina alternativematerialsfortheenrichmentofbiogaswithmethane
AT jodłowskigrzegorzstefan alternativematerialsfortheenrichmentofbiogaswithmethane
AT szczurowskijakub alternativematerialsfortheenrichmentofbiogaswithmethane
AT wojcikmarta alternativematerialsfortheenrichmentofbiogaswithmethane