Cargando…

Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite

Objectives: To investigate in vitro post-fatigue fracture behavior of endodontically treated molars having been differently restored. Methods: A total of 120 extracted human molars were used. A total of 120 specimens in 14 test groups and one control group (n = 8) were root canal treated. After post...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frankenberger, Roland, Winter, Julia, Dudek, Marie-Christine, Naumann, Michael, Amend, Stefanie, Braun, Andreas, Krämer, Norbert, Roggendorf, Matthias J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247733
_version_ 1784622298201849856
author Frankenberger, Roland
Winter, Julia
Dudek, Marie-Christine
Naumann, Michael
Amend, Stefanie
Braun, Andreas
Krämer, Norbert
Roggendorf, Matthias J.
author_facet Frankenberger, Roland
Winter, Julia
Dudek, Marie-Christine
Naumann, Michael
Amend, Stefanie
Braun, Andreas
Krämer, Norbert
Roggendorf, Matthias J.
author_sort Frankenberger, Roland
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To investigate in vitro post-fatigue fracture behavior of endodontically treated molars having been differently restored. Methods: A total of 120 extracted human molars were used. A total of 120 specimens in 14 test groups and one control group (n = 8) were root canal treated. After postendodontic sealing and build-up (AdheSE Universal, SDR), additional MOD preparations were cut. Postendodontic restorations were: Direct restorations (Tetric EvoCeram BulkFill bonded with AdheSE Universal and EverX Posterior/Essentia bonded with G-Premio Bond; as filling (F) or direct partial crown (DPC) after reducing the cusps 2 mm; indirect adhesive restorations (partial crown/PC vs. full crown/FC): e.max CAD, Celtra Duo, both luted with Variolink Esthetic; indirect zirconia restorations (partial crown/PC vs. full crown/FC), luted with RelyX Unicem 2; indirect non-bonded cast gold restorations (partial crown/PC vs. full crown/FC; Degunorm), luted with Ketac Cem. Before and after 300,000 thermocycles (5/55 °C) and 1.2 Mio. A total of 100 N load cycles, replicas were analyzed under a SEM for marginal quality in enamel and dentin (where applicable) and finally, specimens were loaded until fracture. Results: In direct groups, there was no difference between RC and FRC in fracture strength (p > 0.05); however, direct partial crowns showed higher post-fatigue fracture resistance. Regarding marginal quality, intracoronal FRC restorations exhibited more gap-free margins in enamel than RC. In the indirect groups, there was no significant difference between partial and full crowns in any of the adhesively luted ceramic groups regarding post-fatigue fracture resistance. Zirconia partial crowns exhibited significantly lower marginal quality in enamel. Indirect groups performed significantly better than direct groups in fracture resistance. Within the indirect restorations, both cast gold groups and zirconia full crowns exhibited the highest fracture resistance being superior to control teeth. Significances: Within the limits of this in vitro investigation, it can be concluded that any kind of indirect restoration with cusp replacement is suitable for ETT restoration when a certain cavity extension is exceeded. All indirect restorations, i.e., endocrowns, partial crowns, and full crowns showed a promising performance after in vitro fatigue-loading.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8706873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87068732021-12-25 Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite Frankenberger, Roland Winter, Julia Dudek, Marie-Christine Naumann, Michael Amend, Stefanie Braun, Andreas Krämer, Norbert Roggendorf, Matthias J. Materials (Basel) Article Objectives: To investigate in vitro post-fatigue fracture behavior of endodontically treated molars having been differently restored. Methods: A total of 120 extracted human molars were used. A total of 120 specimens in 14 test groups and one control group (n = 8) were root canal treated. After postendodontic sealing and build-up (AdheSE Universal, SDR), additional MOD preparations were cut. Postendodontic restorations were: Direct restorations (Tetric EvoCeram BulkFill bonded with AdheSE Universal and EverX Posterior/Essentia bonded with G-Premio Bond; as filling (F) or direct partial crown (DPC) after reducing the cusps 2 mm; indirect adhesive restorations (partial crown/PC vs. full crown/FC): e.max CAD, Celtra Duo, both luted with Variolink Esthetic; indirect zirconia restorations (partial crown/PC vs. full crown/FC), luted with RelyX Unicem 2; indirect non-bonded cast gold restorations (partial crown/PC vs. full crown/FC; Degunorm), luted with Ketac Cem. Before and after 300,000 thermocycles (5/55 °C) and 1.2 Mio. A total of 100 N load cycles, replicas were analyzed under a SEM for marginal quality in enamel and dentin (where applicable) and finally, specimens were loaded until fracture. Results: In direct groups, there was no difference between RC and FRC in fracture strength (p > 0.05); however, direct partial crowns showed higher post-fatigue fracture resistance. Regarding marginal quality, intracoronal FRC restorations exhibited more gap-free margins in enamel than RC. In the indirect groups, there was no significant difference between partial and full crowns in any of the adhesively luted ceramic groups regarding post-fatigue fracture resistance. Zirconia partial crowns exhibited significantly lower marginal quality in enamel. Indirect groups performed significantly better than direct groups in fracture resistance. Within the indirect restorations, both cast gold groups and zirconia full crowns exhibited the highest fracture resistance being superior to control teeth. Significances: Within the limits of this in vitro investigation, it can be concluded that any kind of indirect restoration with cusp replacement is suitable for ETT restoration when a certain cavity extension is exceeded. All indirect restorations, i.e., endocrowns, partial crowns, and full crowns showed a promising performance after in vitro fatigue-loading. MDPI 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8706873/ /pubmed/34947327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247733 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Frankenberger, Roland
Winter, Julia
Dudek, Marie-Christine
Naumann, Michael
Amend, Stefanie
Braun, Andreas
Krämer, Norbert
Roggendorf, Matthias J.
Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite
title Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite
title_full Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite
title_fullStr Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite
title_full_unstemmed Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite
title_short Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite
title_sort post-fatigue fracture and marginal behavior of endodontically treated teeth: partial crown vs. full crown vs. endocrown vs. fiber-reinforced resin composite
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8706873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34947327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14247733
work_keys_str_mv AT frankenbergerroland postfatiguefractureandmarginalbehaviorofendodonticallytreatedteethpartialcrownvsfullcrownvsendocrownvsfiberreinforcedresincomposite
AT winterjulia postfatiguefractureandmarginalbehaviorofendodonticallytreatedteethpartialcrownvsfullcrownvsendocrownvsfiberreinforcedresincomposite
AT dudekmariechristine postfatiguefractureandmarginalbehaviorofendodonticallytreatedteethpartialcrownvsfullcrownvsendocrownvsfiberreinforcedresincomposite
AT naumannmichael postfatiguefractureandmarginalbehaviorofendodonticallytreatedteethpartialcrownvsfullcrownvsendocrownvsfiberreinforcedresincomposite
AT amendstefanie postfatiguefractureandmarginalbehaviorofendodonticallytreatedteethpartialcrownvsfullcrownvsendocrownvsfiberreinforcedresincomposite
AT braunandreas postfatiguefractureandmarginalbehaviorofendodonticallytreatedteethpartialcrownvsfullcrownvsendocrownvsfiberreinforcedresincomposite
AT kramernorbert postfatiguefractureandmarginalbehaviorofendodonticallytreatedteethpartialcrownvsfullcrownvsendocrownvsfiberreinforcedresincomposite
AT roggendorfmatthiasj postfatiguefractureandmarginalbehaviorofendodonticallytreatedteethpartialcrownvsfullcrownvsendocrownvsfiberreinforcedresincomposite