Cargando…

Plasmapheresis: Is it a potential alternative treatment for chronic urticaria?

BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria is a common disease. Plasmapheresis is an alternative treatment that can be appropriate for patients who are resistant to treatment with 2nd generation antihistamines or for whom treatment with omalizumab is unsuitable. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of plasmapher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aleksandraviciute, Laima, Malinauskiene, Laura, Cerniauskas, Kestutis, Chomiciene, Anzelika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0399
_version_ 1784622379327029248
author Aleksandraviciute, Laima
Malinauskiene, Laura
Cerniauskas, Kestutis
Chomiciene, Anzelika
author_facet Aleksandraviciute, Laima
Malinauskiene, Laura
Cerniauskas, Kestutis
Chomiciene, Anzelika
author_sort Aleksandraviciute, Laima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria is a common disease. Plasmapheresis is an alternative treatment that can be appropriate for patients who are resistant to treatment with 2nd generation antihistamines or for whom treatment with omalizumab is unsuitable. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of plasmapheresis treatment in chronic urticaria. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed based on the data of 98 patients suffering from refractory chronic urticaria who received plasmapheresis as an alternative treatment in Vilnius University’s Hospital Santaros Clinics from 2000 to 2020. The efficiency of the treatment was evaluated by clinical judgment. RESULTS: 58.2% of the patients exhibited a complete or significant response; of these, 37.8% had temporary relief of symptoms and 20.4% achieved disease remission; 41.8% showed no response to the plasmapheresis. Men (34.8%) had a tendency to achieve disease remission more often than women (16%) (p < 0.05). One patient did not finish the plasmapheresis treatment due to the symptoms’ exacerbation and treatment with omalizumab was initiated. CONCLUSION: Plasmapheresis is a safe and effective alternative treatment when traditional treatment is unavailable or does not relieve symptoms completely. Our data showed that plasmapheresis was effective in more than half of our patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8707202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87072022022-01-20 Plasmapheresis: Is it a potential alternative treatment for chronic urticaria? Aleksandraviciute, Laima Malinauskiene, Laura Cerniauskas, Kestutis Chomiciene, Anzelika Open Med (Wars) Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria is a common disease. Plasmapheresis is an alternative treatment that can be appropriate for patients who are resistant to treatment with 2nd generation antihistamines or for whom treatment with omalizumab is unsuitable. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of plasmapheresis treatment in chronic urticaria. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed based on the data of 98 patients suffering from refractory chronic urticaria who received plasmapheresis as an alternative treatment in Vilnius University’s Hospital Santaros Clinics from 2000 to 2020. The efficiency of the treatment was evaluated by clinical judgment. RESULTS: 58.2% of the patients exhibited a complete or significant response; of these, 37.8% had temporary relief of symptoms and 20.4% achieved disease remission; 41.8% showed no response to the plasmapheresis. Men (34.8%) had a tendency to achieve disease remission more often than women (16%) (p < 0.05). One patient did not finish the plasmapheresis treatment due to the symptoms’ exacerbation and treatment with omalizumab was initiated. CONCLUSION: Plasmapheresis is a safe and effective alternative treatment when traditional treatment is unavailable or does not relieve symptoms completely. Our data showed that plasmapheresis was effective in more than half of our patients. De Gruyter 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8707202/ /pubmed/35071772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0399 Text en © 2022 Laima Aleksandraviciute et al., published by De Gruyter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aleksandraviciute, Laima
Malinauskiene, Laura
Cerniauskas, Kestutis
Chomiciene, Anzelika
Plasmapheresis: Is it a potential alternative treatment for chronic urticaria?
title Plasmapheresis: Is it a potential alternative treatment for chronic urticaria?
title_full Plasmapheresis: Is it a potential alternative treatment for chronic urticaria?
title_fullStr Plasmapheresis: Is it a potential alternative treatment for chronic urticaria?
title_full_unstemmed Plasmapheresis: Is it a potential alternative treatment for chronic urticaria?
title_short Plasmapheresis: Is it a potential alternative treatment for chronic urticaria?
title_sort plasmapheresis: is it a potential alternative treatment for chronic urticaria?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8707202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0399
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksandraviciutelaima plasmapheresisisitapotentialalternativetreatmentforchronicurticaria
AT malinauskienelaura plasmapheresisisitapotentialalternativetreatmentforchronicurticaria
AT cerniauskaskestutis plasmapheresisisitapotentialalternativetreatmentforchronicurticaria
AT chomicieneanzelika plasmapheresisisitapotentialalternativetreatmentforchronicurticaria